Psychological Disorders The diagnosis and treatment of psycholog ✓ Solved

The diagnosis and treatment of psychological disorders across the lifespan has changed with time. Discuss at least one point grounded in the nature/nurture debate that relates to how ADHD is currently diagnosed as well as how the treatment has changed as compared to earlier versions of the DSM. You may use Internet resources as well as your textbook. Please cite your resource(s).

Paper For Above Instructions

Psychological disorders, like Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), have undergone significant changes in their diagnosis and treatment over time. The nature/nurture debate serves as a critical framework in understanding these changes, particularly in how society perceives mental health. ADHD is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by patterns of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity that can impair functioning in various settings (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

Historically, ADHD diagnosis relied heavily on observable behaviors. The earlier editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) primarily emphasized biological underpinnings and observable symptoms (APA, 1952). This focus led to a perception of ADHD as purely biological. However, recent findings illustrate that environmental factors, which fall under the "nurture" aspect of the debate, significantly contribute to the manifestation and diagnosis of ADHD. Contemporary research highlights the role of prenatal exposure to toxins, dietary influences, and psychosocial factors (Biederman et al., 2012; Nigg, 2013). This shift emphasizes a more holistic approach to diagnosis and underscores the multifaceted nature of ADHD.

As the understanding of ADHD evolved, so did the criteria for its diagnosis in subsequent editions of the DSM. The DSM-5, published in 2013, expanded on the diagnostic criteria for ADHD, allowing for greater consideration of symptoms that manifest in adolescence and adulthood, as opposed to solely during childhood (APA, 2013). This shift acknowledges the persistence and evolution of ADHD symptoms over a lifespan, which is crucial for accurate diagnosis. Furthermore, the DSM-5 emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive evaluation process that considers both genetic and environmental influences, thereby addressing the nature/nurture debate more effectively than previous editions.

Treatment approaches for ADHD have also changed dramatically over time, reflecting advances in our understanding of the disorder. Initially, behavioral therapies and stimulant medications were the primary means of treatment (Barkley, 2014). These treatment methods primarily targeted reducing symptoms of hyperactivity and impulsivity, with less emphasis on the psychological implications of untreated ADHD.

In recent years, the treatment regimen has diversified. A more integrative approach that includes cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), psychoeducation, and social skills training is now increasingly favored alongside medication (Weiss et al., 2019). This holistic approach aligns with the current understanding that both genetic predispositions and environmental factors contribute to ADHD, thus addressing both the nature and nurture influences. Researchers note that combining medication with behavioral interventions often yields more significant improvements in functioning over the long term (Faraone et al., 2015).

The evolution of ADHD treatment also reflects a greater societal awareness of mental health issues and the need for individualized treatment plans. Parents, educators, and mental health professionals now collaborate to create tailored strategies for children and adults with ADHD, recognizing that interventions must address specific challenges posed by the disorder in various contexts (Kooij et al., 2010). This collaborative effort signifies a monumental shift from treating ADHD solely as a medical issue to understanding and addressing the broader psychological and social context.

In conclusion, the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD illustrate the significant implications of the nature/nurture debate within psychology. The more nuanced understanding of ADHD's etiology, which embraces both genetic and environmental factors, has led to advancements in the accurate diagnosis and more effective treatment strategies. This evolving framework not only benefits patients but also fosters a more informed and compassionate discourse about mental health issues within society.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1952). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: Author.

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.

  • Barkley, R. A. (2014). Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

  • Biederman, J., Faraone, S. V., & Monuteaux, M. C. (2012). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A lifespan perspective. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 73(6), 813-821.

  • Faraone, S. V., et al. (2015). Effects of pharmacotherapy on the core symptoms of ADHD: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 172(5), 475-489.

  • Kooij, J. J. S., et al. (2010). Adult ADHD: Diagnostic assessment and management. Journal of the American Medical Association, 303(10), 960-964.

  • Nigg, J. T. (2013). Annual Research Review: On the relations among ADHD, childhood-onset conduct disorder, and adolescent delinquency. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(9), 1003-1019.

  • Weiss, M., et al. (2019). Treatment outcomes following a collaborative care model for ADHD: Long-term follow-up. BMC Psychiatry, 19(1), 365.