QSO 500 Module Eight Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric O ✓ Solved
For this short paper assignment, you will be analyzing ethical issues present in the provided cases. This assignment will assist you in developing your final project, due in Module Nine. Prompt: Read the following two cases: Ethical Issues in Using the Internet in Research—1 and Ethical Issues in Using the Internet in Research—2. Address the following:
- Identify three ethical issues that might arise in the conduct of the research present in the cases. For each, explain why it is an ethical issue and how it may pose a challenge in conducting the research.
- Select one of the issues you identified and describe how you would address this issue to comply with both legal and professional standards of practice.
Your short paper must be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.
Paper For Above Instructions
Analyzing Ethical Issues in Internet Research
In the age of digital technology and instantaneous communication, ethical considerations in research using the internet have gained paramount importance. The two cases "Ethical Issues in Using the Internet in Research—1" and "Ethical Issues in Using the Internet in Research—2" present various ethical dilemmas that researchers encounter. This paper identifies three significant ethical issues that may arise from these cases, provides explanations for each issue, discusses the challenges posed to research conduct, and offers insights on how to address one of these issues in alignment with legal and professional standards of practice.
Identifying Ethical Issues
The first ethical issue pertains to informed consent. Researchers have a duty to inform participants about the nature of the research, its intended use, and any potential risks involved. In online research scenarios, particularly those involving sensitive information, obtaining genuine informed consent becomes critically challenging. Participants may not fully understand the implications of their involvement or how their data may be used. This issue is compounded by the anonymity often provided by the internet, which can make it difficult to ensure that consent has been genuinely and freely given.
The second ethical issue involves data privacy and security. Researchers must ensure that personal data collected from participants is safeguarded against unauthorized access and breaches. In the context of internet research, sensitive information can be easily exposed due to inadequate security measures, leading to ethical ramifications and potentially severe consequences for the participants whose data has been compromised. This not only violates ethical research standards but also has legal implications under various data protection regulations.
The third ethical issue is deception in research. While some research methodologies may require a certain level of deception to maintain the integrity of the study, it becomes ethically fraught when participants are unaware of the true nature of their participation. In online environments, researchers might inadvertently mislead participants regarding the study's purpose or the extent of their involvement. This raises ethical questions about the legitimacy of the findings and the participants' trust in future research endeavors.
Challenges in Conducting Research
Each of these ethical issues poses unique challenges to the research process. Informed consent issues can lead to questions surrounding the validity of the data collected. If participants do not fully understand what they have agreed to, the integrity of the research is called into question. Additionally, without proper consent protocols, researchers may risk facing backlash from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and facing consequences for non-compliance.
Data privacy and security issues can prevent researchers from collecting the breadth of data necessary for comprehensive analysis. If a study's confidentiality is compromised, it may deter future participants from engaging in research or sharing personal information, thus hampering the authenticity and depth of data essential for impactful findings.
Moreover, deception can fundamentally alter participant behavior and skew research results. Deceiving participants may lead to bias in responses, affecting the reliability of the study outcomes and hindering the overall validity of the research. Moreover, it can also foster distrust among participants and potential future participants, severely impacting a researcher's reputation and the willingness of individuals to partake in similar studies.
Addressing Ethical Issues to Ensure Compliance
To comply with legal and professional standards of practice concerning the aforementioned ethical issues, particularly the issue of informed consent, researchers should implement robust and transparent consent processes. For instance, employing comprehensive and clear consent forms tailored for online formats can ensure that participants are fully aware of their rights, the nature of the research, and how their data will be utilized. Furthermore, additional mechanisms, such as consent checkboxes that require participants to acknowledge that they understand the study, can bolster the integrity of the consent process.
Additionally, researchers should consider adopting anonymization and encryption techniques to enhance data privacy and protect sensitive information. Ensuring compliance with data protection laws such as the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) can mitigate risks associated with data breaches and enhance participant trust. Researchers should undergo training in ethical data management to fully understand the importance of these standards.
Finally, in instances where deception is deemed necessary, researchers should be prepared to debrief participants thoroughly after the study's conclusion. This approach will help clarify the rationale behind any deceptive practices, fostering a sense of respect for participants and ensuring alignment with ethical research standards.
Conclusion
In conclusion, ethical issues in internet research demand meticulous attention and proactive strategies to safeguard participants and uphold the integrity of scientific inquiry. By identifying significant ethical challenges such as informed consent, data privacy, and deception, and addressing these through informed practices, researchers can better navigate the complex landscape of online research. This commitment not only enhances the credibility of the research but also fosters a sustainable relationship between researchers and participants.
References
- Buchanan, E. A. (2017). Internet research ethics: Theoretical and practical perspectives. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 10(1), 11-24.
- Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. SAGE Publications.
- Fynes, B., & DeNoble, A. (2020). E-research and ethics. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 227-231.
- Li, M., & Wang, S. (2019). Ethical considerations in Internet research. International Journal of Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, 9(2), 896-910.
- Christakis, D. A. (2012). How TV affects the brains of young children. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(1), 1-9.
- Khazaei, F., Khazaei, O., & Ganbarhi-H, B. (2017). Positive psychology interventions for internet addiction treatment. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 121-128.
- Li, S., Wu, Q., Tang, C., Chen, Z., & Liu, L. (2020). Exercise-based interventions for internet addiction: Neurobiological and neuropsychological evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1296.
- Roh, D., Bhang, S., Choi, J., Kweon, Y., Lee, S., & Potenza, M. N. (2018). The validation of Implicit Association Test measures for smartphone and internet addiction in at-risk children and adolescents. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(1), 79-87.
- Traș, Z. (2019). Internet addiction and loneliness as predictors of internet gaming disorder in adolescents. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(13), 451-457.
- Fayazi, M., & Hasani, J. (2017). Structural relations between brain-behavioral systems, social anxiety, depression, and internet addiction: With regard to revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (r-RST). Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 396-406.