A real spring is not massless, but the mass of your spring was not taken into ac
ID: 1413249 • Letter: A
Question
A real spring is not massless, but the mass of your spring was not taken into account in experiment M19. How would the non-zero mass of your spring have affected your experimental values of the spring constant k and the oscillation period T? k was not affected but the measured T were smaller than the values predicted by the equation relating period, measured mass, and spring constant. k was larger than expected but the measured T were not affected. k was not affected but the measured T were larger than the values predicted by the equation relating period, measured mass, and spring constant. k was smaller than expected but the measured T were not affected.
Explanation / Answer
A real spring is not massless, but the mass of your spring was not taken into account in experiment M19.
How would the non-zero mass of your spring have affected your experimental values of the spring constant k and the oscillation period T?
1. k was not affected but the measured T were smaller than the values predicted by the equation relating period, measured mass, and spring constant.
2. k was larger than expected but the measured T were not affected.
3. k was not affected but the measured T were larger than the values predicted by the equation relating period, measured mass, and spring constant.
4. k was smaller than expected but the measured T were not affected
Option 3 is correct
the non-zero mass of the spring increase the time period of oscilllations and there is no effect on spring constant