Consider the following two alternatives. Each alternative has a 10-year useful l
ID: 2573429 • Letter: C
Question
Consider the following two alternatives. Each alternative has a 10-year useful life and no salvage value. If the combined tax rate is 35 %, calculate the annual straight-line depreciation and annual combined taxes for each alternative? If the MARR is 17.50%, which alternative is preferred? Answer in terms of incremental rate of return analysis . Cash Flow Initial cost Annual Operating Revenue Annual Operating Expenses (-$6,000) $3,000 -$1,000) (-$10,500) $4,750 (-S 1,500) B-A ($4,500) $1,750 (-S 500) Straight-line Depreciation Earnings Before Taxes Annual Combined Taxes After-tax Cash FlowExplanation / Answer
first, we will calculate the incremental cash flow
Now we will calculate NPV using incremental cashflow
As NPV is coming negative Project B in not giving more NPV over project A.
Now lets calculate the NPV of project A
As for the project A NPV is coming positive project should be accepted.
Cashflow A B B-A a Initial Cashflow $ (6,000) $ (10,500) $ (4,500) b Annual operating Revenue $ 3,000 $ 4,750 $ 1,750 c Annual operating Exp $ (1,000) $ (1,500) $ (500) d Depreciation $ (600) $ (1,050) $ (450) e Earning befor tax $ 1,400 $ 2,200 $ 800 f Tax @35% $ (490) $ (770) $ (280) g Profit after tax $ 910 $ 1,430 $ 520 h Cashflow after tax (g+d) $ 1,510 $ 2,480 $ 970