Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

If an independent project with conventional, or normal, cash flows is being anal

ID: 2651713 • Letter: I

Question

If an independent project with conventional, or normal, cash flows is being analyzed, the net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) methods agree. Projects W and X are mutually exclusive projects. Their cash flows and NPV profiles are shown as follows. If the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) for each project is 14%, do the NPV and IRR methods agree or conflict? The methods agree. The methods conflict. A key to resolving this conflict is the assumed reinvestment rate. The NPV calculation implicitly assumes that intermediate cash flows are reinvested at the , and the IRR calculation assumes that the rate at which cash flows can be reinvested is the As a result, when evaluating mutually exclusive projects, the is usually the better decision criterion.

Explanation / Answer

Answer:

1. If an independent project with Conventional, or normal, cash flows is being analyzed , the NPV and IRR methods generally agree.

2. Calculation of NPV and IRR for the Projects:

Year

PVF (14%)

Project W

Project X

CF(w)

CF(w) *PVF

CF(x)

CF(x) *PVF

0

   1.00000

-1000

$      (1,000.00)

-1500

$          1,500.00

1

   0.87719

200

$            175.44

350

$            (307.02)

2

   0.76947

350

$            269.31

500

$            (384.73)

3

   0.67497

400

$            269.99

600

$            (404.98)

4

   0.59208

600

$            355.25

750

$            (444.06)

Net Present value

$              69.99

$              (40.79)

Year

Project W

Project X

0

-1000

-1500

1

200

350

2

350

500

3

400

600

4

600

750

IRR =

16.85%

15.17%

As per NPV evaluation only Project W can be accepted as it has positive NPV.

But as per IRR evaluation both projects can be accepted as they have IRR more than the WACC.

Hence There is a Confliction between both methods.

3. NPV assumes that intermediate cash flows are reinvested at discount rate , and IRR assumes that the rate at which cash flows can be reinvested is the IRR.

4. As a result when evaluating mutually excusive projects , the NPV is usually the better decision criteria.

Year

PVF (14%)

Project W

Project X

CF(w)

CF(w) *PVF

CF(x)

CF(x) *PVF

0

   1.00000

-1000

$      (1,000.00)

-1500

$          1,500.00

1

   0.87719

200

$            175.44

350

$            (307.02)

2

   0.76947

350

$            269.31

500

$            (384.73)

3

   0.67497

400

$            269.99

600

$            (404.98)

4

   0.59208

600

$            355.25

750

$            (444.06)

Net Present value

$              69.99

$              (40.79)

Year

Project W

Project X

0

-1000

-1500

1

200

350

2

350

500

3

400

600

4

600

750

IRR =

16.85%

15.17%