Observational studies had suggested that vitamin E reducesthe risk of heart dise
ID: 2915660 • Letter: O
Question
Observational studies had suggested that vitamin E reducesthe risk of heart disease. Careful experiments, however, showedthat vitamin E has no effect, at least for women. According to acommentary in the journal of the American Medical Association:
Thus, vitamin E enters the categoryof therapies that were promising in epidemiologic and observationalstudies but failed to deliver in adequately powered randomizedcontrolled trails. As in other studies, the "healthy user" biasmust be considered i.e. the healthy life style behaviors thatcharacterize individuals who care enough about their health to takevarious supplements are actually responsible for the better health,but this is minimized with the rigorous trial design.
a. What is the difference between observationalstudies and experiment?
b. What is "randomized control trial"?
c. How does "healthy user bias" explain how people whotake vitamin E supplements have better heath in observationalstudies but not in controlled experiments?