Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Following is the payoff table for the Pittsburgh Development Corporation (PDC) C

ID: 3012533 • Letter: F

Question

Following is the payoff table for the Pittsburgh Development Corporation (PDC) Condominium Project. Amounts are in millions of dollars.

Suppose PDC is optimistic about the potential for the luxury high-rise condominium complex and that this optimism leads to an initial subjective probability assessment of 0.8 that demand will be strong (S1) and a corresponding probability of 0.2 that demand will be weak (S2). Assume the decision alternative to build the large condominium complex was found to be optimal using the expected value approach. Also, a sensitivity analysis was conducted for the payoffs associated with this decision alternative. It was found that the large complex remained optimal as long as the payoff for the strong demand was greater than or equal to $16 million and as long as the payoff for the weak demand was greater than or equal to -$29 million.

Consider the medium complex decision. How much could the payoff under strong demand increase and still keep decision alternative d3the optimal solution? If required, round your answer to two decimal places.

The payoff for the medium complex under strong demand remains less than or equal to $???   million, the large complex remains the best decision.

Consider the small complex decision. How much could the payoff under strong demand increase and still keep decision alternative d3 the optimal solution? If required, round your answer to two decimal places.

The payoff for the small complex under strong demand remains less than or equal to $???   million, the large complex remains the best decision.

State of Nature Decision Alternative Strong Demand S1 Weak Demand S2 Small complex, d1 9 7 Medium complex, d2 13 3 Large complex, d3 21 -9

Explanation / Answer

Therefore best choice is to build Large complex because it has maximum Expected Monetary value, EMV = 15.

Sensitivity Analysis:

For Medium Complex Decision

d3 decision alternative will be remained as optimal decision altenative until

EV(d2) <= $15 M

Let S = the payoff of d2 when demand is strong
W = the payoff of d2 when demand is weak

then EV(d2) = 0.8 x S + 0.2 x W

Let W = $4 M

EV(d2) = 0.8 x S + 0.2 x 4 <= 15

S <= 17.75

Therefore payoff for the medium complex under strong demand, that is S <= $17.75.

=> Large complex still remains best decision

For Small Complex Decision

d3 decision alternative will be remained as optimal decision altenative until

EV(d1) <= $15 M

Let S = the payoff of d1 when demand is strong
W = the payoff of d1 when demand is weak

then EV(d1) = 0.8 x S + 0.2 x W

Let W = $6 M

EV(d1) = 0.8 x S + 0.2 x 6 <= 15

S <= 17.25

Therefore payoff for the small complex under strong demand, that is S <= $17.25.

=> Large complex still remains best decision

State of Nature Decision Alternative Strong Demand S1 Weak Demand S2 EMV Small Complex d1 9 7 8.6 Medium Complex d2 13 3 11 Large Complex d3 21 -9 15 Probability 0.8 0.2