A CEO complains that the winners of his \"rookie junior executive of the year\"
ID: 3055065 • Letter: A
Question
A CEO complains that the winners of his "rookie junior executive of the year" award often turn out to have less impressive performance the following year. He wonders whether the award actually encourages them to slack off. Can you offer a better explanation? Choose the correct answer below O A. The winners may be suffering from regression to the mean. Perhaps they weren't really better than other rookie executives, but just happened to have a lucky year. O B. The winners may not be suffering from regression to the mean. Perhaps they weren't really better than other rookie executives, but just happened to have a lucky ?C. The winners may be suffering om regression o he mean. Perhaps hey were better han other rookie executives, but ha ered to have an un second O D. The winners may not be suffering from regression to the mean. Perhaps they were better than other rookie executives, but just happened to have an unlucky second year. yearExplanation / Answer
ere option A seems to be best explanation as may be they got lucky first year and gt award due to chance or sue to regressionto the mean,