Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Suppose you run a regression of an indicator for attendance in this course (1=at

ID: 3070391 • Letter: S

Question

Suppose you run a regression of an indicator for attendance in this course (1=attended, 0=did not attend) on an indicator for living within walking distance of the school (1=within walking distance, 0=not within walking distance) and the estimated coefficient on the walking distance variable was 0.11 with a standard error of 0.07. The null hypothesis that attendance is the same across groups:

a. Cannot be tested without a larger sample size.

b. Cannot be tested without knowing whether the errors are homoscedastic.

c. Cannot be rejected at the 95% significance level.

d. Can be rejected at the 95% significance level.

Explanation / Answer

Option b is the right one.

We cannot be tested without knowing whether the errors are homoscadastic or not. Because it is one of the assumptions regarding the regression analysis.