Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Independent project , you are to collect data for your observational experiment

ID: 3126234 • Letter: I

Question

Independent project , you are to collect data for your observational experiment and perform a one-way, between-subjects ANOVA on the data using the definitional formula. You are to turn in APA style pater that includes the following:

1. Description of your research project that includes the operational definitions for your variables and your research question.

2. Description of 5-steps of hypothesis tesing.

3. An APA style statement of results including the appropriate details for the inferential statistic and appropriate descriptive statistic.

4. Interpretation of our results and any limitations you are aware of in your project (you should able to identify at least one potential confounding variable).

5. One graphic representation of your data (table or figure)

6. An ANOVA summary table. You will also turn in step by step details of the descriptive and inferential statistics as you calculated them using definitional formulas. This should be included as an appendix to the paper, or it can be hand-written if its neat and you can scan the document in order to turn in.

I need help with this project.

Explanation / Answer

Problem: Susan Sound predicts that students will learn most effectively with a constant background sound, as opposed to an unpredictable sound or no sound at all. She randomly divides twenty-four students into three groups of eight. All students study a passage of text for 30 minutes. Those in group 1 study with background sound at a constant volume in the background. Those in group 2 study with noise that changes volume periodically. Those in group 3 study with no sound at all. After studying, all students take a 10 point multiple choice test over the material. Their scores follow:

Constat sound

Random sound

No sound

7

5

2

4

5

4

6

3

7

8

4

1

6

4

2

6

7

1

2

2

5

9

2

5

Test the hypothesis at 0.05 significance of sound.

x1

x12

x2

x22

x3

x32

7

49

5

25

2

4

4

16

5

25

4

16

6

36

3

9

7

49

8

64

4

16

1

1

6

36

4

16

2

4

6

36

7

49

1

1

2

4

2

4

5

25

9

81

2

4

5

25

Sx1 = 48

Sx12 = 322

Sx2 = 32

Sx22 = 148

Sx3 = 27

Sx32 = 125

(Sx1)2 = 2304

(Sx2)2 = 1024

(Sx3)2 = 729

M1 = 6

M2 = 4

M3 = 3.375

Total sum of square(TSS)=(322+148+125)-(48+32+27)^2/24

= 595 - 477.04

TSS= 117.96

Among sum of squares=[[(2304/8)+(1024/8)+(729/8)]-477.04]]

= 507.13 - 477.04

SSamong = 30.08

SSwithin = 117.96 - 30.08 = 87.88

A NOVA TABLE

Sources of vriation

ss

df

MSS

F-ratio

Among

30.8

2

15.04

3.59

Within

87.88

21

4.18

Total

118.68

23

F-test statistics=3.59

Hypothesis:

Null hypothesis H0: Given three background sounds are homogeneous.

Null hypothesis H1: Given three background sounds are heterogeneous

Critical value at 0.05,(2,21)d.f from F-test table is 3.4668.

Conclusion: since F-test statistic(3.59)>F-critical(3.4668), so accept alternative hypothesis H1.

Interpretation: Susan can conclude that her hypothesis may be supported. The means are as she predicted, in that the constant music group has the highest score. However, the signficant F only indicates that at least two means are signficantly different from one another

Constat sound

Random sound

No sound

7

5

2

4

5

4

6

3

7

8

4

1

6

4

2

6

7

1

2

2

5

9

2

5