Formulate the indicated conclusion in n on technical terms. Be sure to address t
ID: 3132419 • Letter: F
Question
Formulate the indicated conclusion in n on technical terms. Be sure to address the orgional claim:
An ebtomologist writes an article in a scientific journal which claims that fewer than 3 in 10,000 male fire flies are unable to produce light due to genetic mutation. Assuming that a hypothsis test of the claim has been concluded and that the conclusion is to reject the null hypothsis, state the conclusion in no technical terms.
a. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 3 in 10,000
b. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is greater than 3 in 10,000
c. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 3 in 10,000
d. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is greater than 3 in 10,000.
Explanation / Answer
The claim is what the ebtomologist tried to establish. Since, null hypothesis is rejected ther ei ssufficient evidence to ocnclude that tru eproportion is less than 3 in 10000.
Option c.