Discuss your results: Are your values for the 10 ng/mL LPS the highest and 1 ng/
ID: 3230943 • Letter: D
Question
Discuss your results: Are your values for the 10 ng/mL LPS the highest and 1 ng/mL and 0.1 ng/mL progressively lower? Are your untreated values low compared to stimulated? Does your standard curve have a good regression value? Are your p-values statistically significant?UNTR 0.1 1.250 1200 0.050 0.095 0.180 0.415 0.030 0.615 0.710 0.060 0.101 0.210 0.420 0.025 0.105 0.200 0.510 0.035 0.300 0.315 0.045 0-150 0.160 0.072 0.088 0215 0.505 0.025 0.080 0.096 0.180 0.490 0.020 0.040 0.035 0.060 0,10SI 0.1951 0.480 0.025 0.030 0.030 0.0267 0.025 0.030 Updated table where the average negative group is deducted from all values 1000 1.250 1200 0.023 0.068 0.153 0.388 500 0.615 0710 0.033 0.074 0183 0.393 250 0.300 0315 0.018 0.078 0173 0.483 125 0.150 0160 0.045 0061 0.183 0.473 63 0.075 0.080 0.053 0.069 0153 0.463 31 0.040 0.035 0.033 0.078 0168 0.453 16 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.025 66 151 3861 31 72 181 291 16 76 171 481 186 476 51 67 151 461 31 761 166 451 UNTR 0.1 ng/mL ng/mL 10 ng/mL Avg 321 70 168 441 EST DW 131 7 151 42 5.08149 E-
Explanation / Answer
consider the hypothesis that 10 ng/mL LPS the highest and 1 ng/mL low
mean/average difference= 441-168 = 273
Because the standard deviations are much smaller than the difference between the means, this means the data support the hypothesis.
Thus, 10 ng/mL LPS the highest and 1 ng/mL and 0.1 ng/mL progressively lower
on comparing the first two tables we can say that untreated values low compared to stimulated
Comparing the p-value at 5% level of significance it is significant since p-value<0.05