Neuroscience vs, Cognitive Compare the two perspectives. How are they similar? H
ID: 3445647 • Letter: N
Question
Neuroscience vs, Cognitive Compare the two perspectives. How are they similar? How are they different? >Choose an example of an issue to be researched. Give an example of this topic could be researched from each of these perspectives. .Would the researcher use an experimental design or a correlational design? Explain your answer. This should be several paragraphs for full credit! Your response should demonstrate that you understand each of these perspectives (describe the perspective) and how the two chosen to evaluate are similar different as well as how someone from this perspective would study psychology! Don't forget to give an example for each perspective. The examples should contrast how a topic would be studied from each perspective.Explanation / Answer
Cognitive science is an offshoot of human psychology and is literally the study of cognition, or thought. It includes language, problem-solving, decision-making, and perception, especially consciously aware perception. Cognitive science started with those higher-level behavioral traits that were observable or testable and asked what is going on inside the mind or brain to make that possible.
Neuroscience is a branch of biology that began as the study of the anatomy and physiology of neural tissue. It grew out of clinical neurology and neurobiology, which evolved into neuroscience. Neurobiology concerns itself first and foremost with the observed anatomy and physiology of the brain, from major structures down to neurons and molecules. Neuroscience adds to that the study of how the brain works, mechanistically, functionally, and systemically to produce observable behavior.
The neuroscience approach is scientific as variables are measured objectively and casual relationships can be found (lab experiments.) uses empirical methods and theories are falsifiable. Cognitive approach is also scientific as theories can be tested and are falsifiable. Uses empirical method and tests theories using lab experiments.
Cognitive science and neuroscience have been meeting in the middle now.When Functional MRI came along, cognitive science suddenly got new legitimacy as a branch of the hard science of neuroscience. Funding increased, cognitive scientists started calling themselves neuroscientists, and the focus shifted to generating fMRI pictures of what was going on inside of the head rather than just speculating based on psychophysics observations.
fMRI also served neuroscience because it made human experiments possible, opening the door to studying higher-level and human-only capacities.
A recent longitudinal study of CBT in women with chronic fatigue syndrome found increase in the gray matter of the lateral prefrontal cortex after 16 CBT sessions (de Lange et al., 2008). Increase in the gray matter volume correlated with enhanced cognitive processing speed, suggesting that the neuroplasticity evoked by psychotherapy played a causal role in rehabilitation of cognitive performance after cerebral atrophy resulting from chronic fatigue. It is a comparative experimental study which aims to provide an understanding of neurobiological changes by using elements of cognitive perspective indicating the negative outcomes leading to chronic fatigue.