Come up with and carefully present at least one counter-argument or objection to
ID: 3494309 • Letter: C
Question
Come up with and carefully present at least one counter-argument or objection to the Anti-Tyranny Argument. That is, I want you to criticize the argument (and, if you wish, you may also present a rebuttal to those criticisms). Even if you agree with the Anti-Tyranny argument, put yourself in the mind of the opponent and search for a rational objection against it (as presented here). You may in turn respond to that objection. So far as I can tell, there are twostrong objections against it. Please take your time with this assignment. Your response should be around 3-5 sentences. You can earn up to 3 points, and your grade will be determined by the clarity and the depth of your response. Here is the Anti-Tyranny argument again: If the people or the citizenry of the country are well armed with handguns and semi-automatic rifles, it is considerably less likely that a tyrannical government (a government that completely overthrows our constitutional rights) will take power in the United States. This tyrannical government could be of foreign origin, or it could be domestic (a coup by the military or some group that has power over the US military).Explanation / Answer
The situation described above in a case of rebellion war in middle-east countries like Iraq, and Kuwait and between Jerusalem and Palestine and even rebellion wars between army soldiers and small tribals in Bastar region of India, and even north-east tribal rebellion groups which have open access to local manufactured and international brands of arms and ammunations with investment and dealing in foreign unclaimed bank acounts for the welfare of their freedom and individuality of their race and demand for a separate state like the situation between Jammu and Kashmir and Pakistan in India. Further there are Boko-Haram tribes in Africa which are big rebellion groups.
United States of America has peace keeping forces along with treaties with united nations organisations, and thus such army forces fight with rebellion groups and destroy their militant groups in Middle east or rebellion groups in Africa. It is not possibe that such terrorist groups can take over the governmental proceedings in USA for example the destruction of twin towers in USA after a plane crash or plane hijacking after the killing of Osama-Bin-Laden is not a strong evidence of ruling of a state of USA by foreign powers with arms and weapons. This model can be implemented in Afghanistan with conflict from tehran or pakistan with conflict from waziristhan, or middle east conflict of saddam hussain or for example the conflict of jerusalem with palestine and the role of Yasser Arafat.
There is very less chance of dictator rule in USA under army general or President rule as USA has diplomatic and important colonial treaties with many countries of the world.