An engineer working as a computer programmer played a minor role in developing a
ID: 355543 • Letter: A
Question
An engineer working as a computer programmer played a minor role in developing a computer system for a state department of health. The system stored medical information on individuals identified by name. Through no fault of the engineer, few controls had been placed on the system to limit easy access to the system by unauthorized people. Upon learning of this, the engineer first informed his supervisor and then higher management, all of whom refused to do anything about the situation because of the anticipated expense required to correct it. In violation of the rules for using the system, the programmer very easily obtained a copy of his medical records. He then sent them to a state legislator as evidence for his claims that the right of citizens to confidentiality regarding such information was threatened by the system. 4 Was his behavior improper? a. b. Was his subsequent firing justified? Source: Donn B. Parker, Ethical Conflicts in Computer Science and Technology (Arlington, Virginia: AFIPS Press 1979), 72-74Explanation / Answer
4.
A.
His behavior was not improper, because he acted in the capacity of a whistleblower and acted in the best interest of the citizens and society at large. So, there is a noble intention to save the right of confidentiality of the individuals, delivered by the constitution. So, the action taken up by the engineer is ethically right and morally sound as per the societal norms. Besides, he already tried to convince his superior management and in the event of unable to make them take a corrective action, he was forced to opt for the whistleblower activity.
B.
No, his subsequent firing is not justified and it sends a message that anybody going against the decision of the management will face the same result even if it is in the best interest of the society and ethically correct conduct. It will set up negative sentiments and demotivate in the concerned department or organization. It will attract lawsuits against the employers and public movement against the depart may also take place. Regulatory bodies will also take interest and can take appropriate action against the firing decisions taken up by the department.