Assignment 6 (a) Explain the remedies for misrepresentation. on to a secondhand
ID: 361086 • Letter: A
Question
Assignment 6 (a) Explain the remedies for misrepresentation. on to a secondhand car dealer called Harry. The ) James sold his car privately by cheque to a rogue he has traced the car to Harry's showroom. who represented himself as Robert Gould, whose chequebook and banker's card the rogue had recently stolen. For additional proof of iden- tity the rogue showed James a travel pass in Robert's name onto which the rogue had put his own photograph. The rogue then sold the car Advise James. Would it make any difference to your answer if James had become suspicious shortly after selling the car and had notified the police?Explanation / Answer
Fraudulent, negligent or innocent misstatement or we can say that an incomplete statement of a material fact which directly lead other party to enter into a contract in which the other party has rights to seek compensation for the specific damages. In misinterpretation, defending party has right to sue the first party for the damages.
For avoiding misrepresentation one can follow these steps.
By being truthful to the buyer or a service taker, a seller or a service provider can be verified with the specific structure and reduce the overall risk of misrepresentation. Even if the structure is illegal it have to be told to the customer as it is.
By being totally informed about the specific product or the place which is being sold or being contractor to the customer, man can easily avoid misrepresentation and it can be very beneficial for creating a clean contracting process.
While selling the products for good one should always disclose all the notices related with the specific entity that is being sold avoid any kind of misrepresentation in future.
In the specific condition James should contact the legal authority to prove the ownership of the car and explain the overall keys to the legal authorities that would definitely help James to get back his car. As this is a case of a fraudulent transaction, police will be helping out James and the showroom.
James should have done background check of the buyer before selling his car and should not be dealing in check for selling the cars to strangers. It should have contacted some of the car selling services which take a little incentive of the overall sales price of the car as an interest of selling the car. The specific companies go through the every check required for selling a car to the customer.
Definitely would have make difference if james had been a bit secretions about the specific customer who bought his car. Police would have been brought down the suspicious bhaiya and have integrated about the same situation which would have directly lead him to jail because he doesn't have any kind of proof and was doing fraudulent transactions.