Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Marks: 1.5 Anonvmity and Securitv Purpose The purpose of this activity is to che

ID: 3711096 • Letter: M

Question

Marks: 1.5 Anonvmity and Securitv Purpose The purpose of this activity is to check a student's ability to debate pros and cons of certain aspects related to the security concerns raised by the usage of Internet these days Question Email viruses are typically launched by people who modify header information to hide their identity. Brightmail's Enrique Salem says that in the future, your email reader will authenticate the sender before putting the message in your inbox. That way, you will know the source of all the emails you read. Alan Nugent of Novell says, T'nm eliminating anonymity if that is the price for security". Will eliminating anonymity make computers more secure? Action Items kind of a fan of bate the opinion of Mr. Salem. . De . Debate the opinion of Mr. Alan. Give pros and cons both for anonymity and tor security . Relate anonymity and security with the help of a practical example from real life Finally, write your answer with a 'yes' or a 'no' to the following statement "Will eliminating anonymity make computers more secure? along with a ustification/reason in one or two lines

Explanation / Answer

?I agree with Mr. Salem totally in the near future or say in current world, your email reader will authenticate the sender before putting the message in your inbox. I would like to draw your attention towards brief summary of email authentication and the current functionalities that are working on it.

Email Authentication: Email authentication/validation confirms that an email is really from you or your business. Consider it like a computerized signature: it secures your image, character and notoriety. It's a standout amongst the most essential advances you can take to enhance your deliverability.

Why authentication matters?

The way email was initially composed makes sender points of interest simple to manufacture, or "spoof or say farce". Spammers exploit this by acting like banks, multinational company, or any vitality organizations generally to take cash or spread malware or any other viruses results in foul name of global organizations that aren't involved actually. Email administrations, for example, Outlook.com and Yahoo utilize email confirmation to help decide whether something is spam, or merits blocking totally to secure their clients. Accordingly, any unauthenticated email, regardless of how genuine the substance, risks winding up in somebody's spam folder.

Let's have a look at how authentication impacts deliverability,

SMTP assumes the nearness of dependable system network and name resolution through the Domain Name Service (DNS). Anything that meddles with these capacities can keep messages from being conveyed in your mailbox. Similarly another factor that influences deliverability is message content. Perceiving a message as spam or malware by looking at its substance (headers, URLs) has ended up being an entirely decent approach to distinguish.

So to sum up i would like to provide an example of Outlook.com that provides a "on behalf of" to indicate an email hasn't had it's sending domain authenticated and this gets removed if it is sent by an authenticated domain.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

?Eliminating anonimity if that is the price of security is quite a favorable step in terms of data security on the other hand it is also having some demerits. We'll discuss how anonymity will help in securing the data transmission.

Anonymity can be defined as the state of being unknown. The internet community is rapidly changing and developing as a greater amount of the world goes ahead line. Free discourse and secrecy have dependably been critical true societal issues and have been the subjects of various warmed court cases. Throughout the most recent couple of years, a serious fight has been seething between the nationals of the net over the issue of whether on-line secrecy ought to be wiped out. One side feels that individuals ought to have enough conviction in their convictions to state them without holing up behind obscurity. The opposite side feels that obscurity is fundamental for the assurance of flexibility of articulation.

The general public in which we live can much of the time be to a great degree preservationist, frequently making it risky to put forth certain expressions, have certain feelings, or receive a specific way of life. Namelessness is vital for on line talks including sexual mishandle, minority issues, provocation, sex lives, and numerous different things. Moreover, obscurity is valuable for individuals who need to make specialized inquiries that they would prefer not to concede they don't have a clue about the response to, report unlawful exercises without dread of retaliation, and numerous different things.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Security and anonymity are two unique concepts. They are both progressively vital as we get progressively wiretapped and followed, legitimately so or not, and it's vital to comprehend why they are a vital piece of our common freedoms – why they are not only advantageous to the individual, but rather totally basic to a free society.

Anonymity is the point at which you need individuals to perceive what you do, just not that it's you doing it. , suppose i am writing my thoughts on the internet that can be on national issue but it doesn't mean that i am doing it to throw hate towards an individual or group, but simply because i want to keep the activity there to myself as it is my personal opinion.

Whereas, security is also essential in relation with anonymity. Typical example would be to hide your identity and downloading or surfing the internet using Virtual Private Network in order to become secure from the hackers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, eliminating anonymity make computers more secure but on the other hand as i said anonymity servers on the internet provide a vital service with many benefits to the online community. The minority of users who abuse this service by sending harassing messages or engaging in illegal activities are a definite disadvantage to anonymity and security on the internet but this problem can be reduced significantly by implementing strict guidelines.