Consider a set of natural language sentences collected from Web pages. i. A huma
ID: 3747252 • Letter: C
Question
Consider a set of natural language sentences collected from Web pages.
i. A human can like another human.
ii. A human can have a sex property of a man or a woman.
iii. A man can be the father of another human.
iv. A woman can be the mother of another human.
v. A human can be married to another human.
vi. A human can have a BirthYear property of type “xs:Year”.
vii. If a human is married to another, then they like each other.
viii. If a human is a mother or father, the human is a parent.
Write a RDF schema and give a graphical presentation to describe these relationships.
Explanation / Answer
RDF Schema gives an information displaying vocabulary to RDF information. It is supplemented by a few partner reports which portray the fundamental ideas and dynamic linguistic structure of RDF [RDF11-CONCEPTS], the formal semantics of RDF [RDF11-MT], and different cement punctuations for RDF, for example, Turtle [TURTLE], TriG, [TRIG], and JSON-LD [JSON-LD]. The RDF Primer [RDF11-PRIMER] gives a casual presentation and cases of the utilization of the ideas determined in this archive.
This report is planned to give an unmistakable determination of RDF Schema to the individuals who locate the formal semantics detail [RDF11-MT] overwhelming. Subsequently, this archive copies material additionally indicated in the RDF Semantics detail. Where there is difference between this record and the RDF Semantics detail, the RDF Semantics determination ought to be taken to be right.
RDF Schema is a semantic expansion of RDF. It gives components to depicting gatherings of related assets and the connections between these assets. RDF Schema is composed in RDF utilizing the terms portrayed in this report. These assets are utilized to decide qualities of different assets, for example, the areas and scopes of properties.
The RDF Schema class and property framework is like the sort frameworks of question situated programming dialects, for example, Java. RDF Schema varies from numerous such frameworks in that as opposed to characterizing a class as far as the properties its occasions may have, RDF Schema depicts properties as far as the classes of asset to which they apply. This is the part of the space and range components portrayed in this determination. For instance, we could characterize the eg:author property to have a space of eg:Document and a scope of eg:Person, while an established question arranged framework may regularly characterize a class eg:Book with a trait called eg:author of sort eg:Person. Utilizing the RDF approach, it is simple for others to therefore characterize extra properties with a space of eg:Document or a scope of eg:Person. This should be possible without the need to re-characterize the first depiction of these classes. One advantage of the RDF property-driven approach is that it enables anybody to broaden the portrayal of existing assets, one of the compositional standards of the Web [BERNERS-LEE98].
This detail does not endeavor to list all the conceivable types of speaking to the importance of RDF classes and properties. Rather, the RDF Schema system is to recognize that there are numerous procedures through which the importance of classes and properties can be depicted. More extravagant vocabulary or 'philosophy' dialects, for example, OWL [OWL2-OVERVIEW], surmising guideline dialects and different formalisms (for instance worldly rationales) will each add to our capacity to catch important speculations about information in the Web.
The dialect characterized in this particular comprises of a gathering of RDF assets that can be utilized to portray other RDF assets in application-particular RDF vocabularies. The center vocabulary is characterized in a namespace casually called rdfs here. That namespace is recognized by the and is traditionally connected with the prefix rdfs:. This detail additionally utilizes the prefix rdf: to allude to the RDF namespace
For comfort and decipherability, this detail utilizes a contracted shape to speak to IRIs. A name of the shape prefix:suffix ought to be deciphered as an IRI comprising of the IRI related with the prefix connected with the postfix.
Relationships
The assets characterized in RDF compositions are themselves Web assets, and can be depicted in other RDF patterns. This guideline gives the essential component to RDF vocabulary advancement. This detail does not endeavor to give a full system to communicating mappings between blueprints; it does anyway give the rdfs:subClassOf and rdfs:subPropertyOf properties. The capacity to express specialization connections between classes (subClassOf) and between properties (subPropertyOf) gives a basic component to making proclamations about how such assets guide to their forerunners.
There are numerous situations for which these straightforward systems are not sufficient; a more far reaching outline mapping component for RDF might be created in future W3C Activity.