Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Paul, who owns aul 2. Dan puts a revcatis ac tually stne ownew rthed eeives plea

ID: 381323 • Letter: P

Question

Paul, who owns aul 2. Dan puts a revcatis ac tually stne ownew rthed eeives please doesn't know that Ster neotiations w usiness. During the day. Tim, Dan company, enter into a form in offer t accetPaul buys paint to be used for the job on June 1, 2010 ob in a part of the parking area that belongs to a adjoining business, witnesses what is being done to area. Dan calls Paul on June 4 to se reas to comeracotaions where Dan, a business owner, offers to have Pa order to to eive does in thehs received his revocation of the o to complete the job. parking lot, so in his lor sines kno ation of his offer in the mai ParknpleeinTi starting the ting job t owner of the comn is othinay, ly tartine the mail. On June 3, Paul begins painting the parking area, a the revocation hcatio top the within his parking his ing l his phone conversation wit Dan tells ells him truthfully that he hasn't received te s opinion there's no agreement at hat he hasn't even started the ijob yet because he's been painti and resolve the ith an o agreement at all. Paul receives the revocation in the mai an. Paul sues Dan and Tim for damages. Please analyze how thcc e issue

Explanation / Answer

Dan and Paul were in the negotiation contract of painting the parking lots of the Dan’s. But the contract was revoked by the Dan’s company, without the knowledge of the Paul according to the Paul.

The court would give the decision in favour of the Dan because the problem as it would say that the negotiation contract has been revoked by the Dan company and it was properly intimated to the Paul through email. It is the Paul responsibility to communicate properly with the other party before starting the work. As the contract is made on the basis of the negotiation so, both the parties are liable to share the information. But the Paul itself don’t bridge the gap of communication between them. It is the choice of the Dan company that what they want to do with the contract whether they want to revoke or work on. As the mail was send from the Dan's company so the Paul has the liability to check his mails regaring the contract.