Here is an opportunity to practice your peer assessment skills on a fictitious (
ID: 418683 • Letter: H
Question
Here is an opportunity to practice your peer assessment skills on a fictitious (fabricated) assignment. After you read the students assignment, please fill out the ASSESSMENT CRITERIA (for practicing). The assessment criteria form is below the fictitious students’ assignment. You can fill it out and then copy and paste it in the Learning Journal.
1. Imagine that the following is a class assignment from a peer student.
2. Read the directions for the assignment that your peer was supposed to follow; making sure that the student understood the directions completely.
3. Read the “submitted assignment” completed by your “peer”.
4. Review the grading/assessment criteria, making sure that you understand what criteria you are to grade/assess for this peers assignment.
5. Grade/assess the assignment using the assessment form (under the students’ assignment), making sure that you provide feedback to support the grade/assessment that you have given to your peer.
6. Before submitting, the peer student was to check to make sure they made no errors.
You will ONLY submit the assessment grading and feedback information in the Learning Journal, which is the assessment criteria form below the student's assignment.
“ASSIGNMENT" DIRECTIONS that the fictitious (fake) student was supposed to follow are below, the student was supposed to:
Research an International Non-Governmental Organization that works on behalf of human rights issues. Share the name and the mission of this organization, along with a summary of some recent work that they have done to advocate for and protect human rights of a particular group(s) and indicate why this work was necessary. Also, the student was to discuss any challenges that they have encountered through their work. Their paper should be at least 500 words in length. And they are to provide a word count.
This is the Fictitious Submitted Assignment from your peer student that you need to Assess:
One non-governmental organization that deals with human rights issues is Amnesty International. I have chosen this organization because it is found in many countries of the world. There have been many problems throughout the world that included torture, illegal arrests and abuse of police and army powers. Many people were killed and some disappeared. Amnesty international was involved in campaigning against such human rights abuses.
Amnesty International is a non-governmental organization. According to its website, that is https://www.amnesty.org/en/who-we-are/ Amnesty International is found in more than 150 countries of the world. It is found in virtually all continents. Amnesty International is a body of volunteers, who are either members or supporters. Their main objective is to carry campaigns against the abuse of human rights. Their main point of reference is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which many countries of the world signed. It also is interested in other human rights standards of various countries and regions of the world.
Amnesty international has assisted in many countries where there are civil wars and unrest. This is so because these are the areas where human rights abuses are rampant. In Africa Amnesty international assisted in identifying human rights abuses in countries such as Ivory Coast, Libya and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Another place is Syria. Syria has had an uprising that is more than a year now. This uprising started during the Arab uprisings of 2011. Most people in some Arab states rose against their dictatorial governments. As a result, the Syrian government ordered mass killings of the civilians. Many civilians are arrested and tortured by the government security forces. As a result Amnesty international has taken a leading role in highlighting the abuses that are taking place in Syria. This has alerted many countries about atrocities in that country. Another country where Amnesty International has highlighted human rights abuses is in Egypt. In Egypt, many civilians were tried under the military court. Most human rights activists are against such an act. Military courts must only try cases of soldiers, not civilians. Many people, as a result, are tortured or unlawfully detained. So Amnesty International has raised their concern on that. It also puts some news of abuses on its website so that many people can access such information. What Amnesty International has done is very important. It has averted genocides and mass killings in many countries. Human lives and suffering have been averted. What Amnesty International does is just like whistle blowing the injustices perpetrated against citizens in these countries.
Amnesty International has many challenges. One of the challenges it faces is that of resources. Since the funds come from donations it usually has insufficient money to carry its work to the fullest. Another challenge is that some of its workers come under threat from armed groups and even governments. Some of its work is targeted by the government, much that some of these have been arrested and tortured as well.
There are many non-governmental organizations that champion human rights in the world. In this essay, the writer has discussed the great work done by Amnesty International. The most recent work has been in Arab countries, where civilians have arisen against their dictatorial governments.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA (for practicing)
Element 1: Did this assignment provide the name and the mission of the International NGO (non-governmental group)?
-The name of the International NGO and the mission were both clearly stated= 10 points
-Only one of these two components were provided= 5 points
-Did not address this part of the assignment = 0 points
Use the feedback box to provide your peer with the reason you did or did not give full credit for this element.
Weight: 1.00
Grade (max 10 points):
Feedback:
Element 2: Did this assignment summarize, in the student’s own words, some of the recent work to advocate for and protect the human rights of a particular group or groups of people?
-This was thoroughly described and answered = 10 points
-Addressed most of the question, but could have been more detailed and elaborated further = 7 points
-The answer was very brief and in need of much further explanation= 4 points
-Did not address this part of the assignment = 0 points
Use the feedback box to provide your peer with the reason you did or did not give full credit for this element.
Weight: 1.00
Grade (max 10 points):
Feedback:
Element 3: Did the assignment address the reasons why this human rights work was necessary, as well as any challenges that arose in providing this work?
-This was thoroughly described and answered = 10 points
-Addressed most of the question, but could have been more detailed and elaborated further = 7 points
-The answer was very brief and in need of much further explanation= 4 points
-Did not address this part of the assignment = 0 points
Use the feedback box to provide your peer with the reason you did or did not give full credit for this element.
Weight: 1.00
Grade (max 10 points):
Feedback:
Element 4: Did the paper meet the length requirements of at least 500 words?
-A provided word count was at least 500 words in length = 10 points
-A provided word count was less than 500 words in length, but more than 400 words in length = 7 points
-A provided word count was less than 400 words in length, but more than 300 words in length = 5 points
-A provided word count was less than 300 words in length = 3 points
-A provide word count was not given = 0 points
Use the feedback box to provide your peer with the reason you did or did not give full credit for this element.
Weight: 1.00
Grade (max 10 points):
Feedback:
Element 5: Indicate what level of effort it looks like your peer invested in this assignment.
Use the below key to award points (10 max.)
-Intense Effort = 10 pts
-Average Effort = 5 pts
-Minimal Effort = 0 pts
Use the feedback box to provide your peer with the reason you did or did not give full credit for this element.
Weight: 1.00
Grade (max 10 points):
Feedback:
General comment:
Explanation / Answer
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Element 1: Did this assignment provide the name and the mission of the International NGO (non-governmental group)? :
Element 2: Did this assignment summarize, in the student’s own words, some of the recent work to advocate for and protect the human rights of a particular group or groups of people? : Yes the student did mention about the recent work going on in Dubai but not much elaboration was done on this regard
Element 3: Did the assignment address the reasons why this human rights work was necessary, as well as any challenges that arose in providing this work? : Yes the student has elaborated this part quite well.
Element 4: Did the paper meet the length requirements of at least 500 words? – Yes the article is of 534 words.
Element 5: Indicate what level of effort it looks like your peer invested in this assignment.
General Comment: Good overall efforts. The weak points can be worked upon.