Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Please answer the following in bold, using the information provided. Thanks for

ID: 423147 • Letter: P

Question

Please answer the following in bold, using the information provided. Thanks for the help!

Employee: Tyler Cahill

Job Title: Production manager

Review period start: 1/1/13

Review period end: 12/31/14

Reviewer: Jan Tomlinson

Production manager competencies: All competencies are rated on a scale from 1–5

1= not meeting requirements, 5= exceeding requirements

Communications 3.00 Meets requirements

Tyler seems to display very good verbal skills, communicating clearly and succinctly

although his Southern accent is somewhat off-putting and leaves people with the

impression that he is not smart. He exhibits good listening skills and appears to

comprehend situations and complex problems well. His written communications skills

meet the requirements of his position, and he keeps others adequately in the loop when

needed. However, sometimes it’s questionable whether Tyler always selects

appropriate methods of communication for the situation at hand.

Team Management 3.50 Meets requirements

According to Tyler’s team evaluations, he sets well-defined goals for the team. His

team’s evaluations also indicate that he collaborates well with his team. He gives the

impression that he provides fair and valid performance feedback. He shows

commitment to enhancing the skills of his team. Tyler includes team members in most

planning, but he assumes responsibility for final production quotas. However, I think

there have been times when he did not make himself available enough to team

members.

Leadership 2.40 Needs improvement

Tyler displays a strong leadership role when action is needed up to a point. At times, he

has reacted poorly in pressure situations. He would command more authority if he

dressed better. His style is somewhat sloppy. Additionally, Tyler seems to come to work

late and shows up for meetings late, which sets a bad example for his team.

Teamwork 4.00 Exceeds requirements

Tyler’s team has shared that he provides helpful feedback to team members and, in

turn, actively seeks feedback from them, but I have not witnessed that. He has excelled

in building team loyalty to the company. Team success is paramount to Tyler. I have

heard that he and his team go out drinking together.

Recruitment & Staffing 3.40 Meets requirements

Tyler analyzes recruitment sources and forecasts staffing needs efficiently. To date, he

has made astute hires of employees who match the company’s needs and understand

the company’s mission.

Delegation 2.60 Meets requirements

Tyler skillfully delegates work to team members, matching tasks with skills well. But he

also gives away the work he does not want to do. Sometimes he doesn’t give team

members enough authority to follow through on tasks delegated, so task completion

might be delayed. It’s not clear whether he gives team members sufficient credit for

work he has delegated to them.

Question;

What are some examples in the performance evaluation document that are based on judgment and not evidence?

In a forthcoming meeting with your manager, what is your plan to address that you believe part of the evaluation was not based on evidence?

How will you explain to your manager why it is important for a manager and employee to agree on performance gaps based on evidence?

Explanation / Answer

1) Below are the examples that are based on judgement not on evidence

a) Communication- Because the document mentions that there is not any clarify about how Tyler communicates as per the case scenario.

b) Team Management- Document gives an ambiguous (confusing) perspective about availability of Tyler with his Team in time of crisis/support.

c) Delegation-The document highlights Tyler's attitude towards rewarding & acknowledging employees for better performance in an very judgemental way & lack of clarity.

2) In my forthcoming meeting with Manager I would bring to his notice that rather relying on other team members opinion about my contribution & involvement in project; he should have a first sense of the situation then analyse the situation.

3) Fortunately my Boss is very clear & thoughtful about evaluation based only on performance but in this case I would recommend my boss to measure the outcome of the task with the inputs, conditions, constraints & environment.