I need help.Thanks Dicta Font Paragraph Styles Editing .2341 5 67 81 9 10 111 I
ID: 427750 • Letter: I
Question
I need help.Thanks
Dicta Font Paragraph Styles Editing .2341 5 67 81 9 10 111 I 12 1 131 141 15 16 Voice 2. Punitive damages are not designed to compensate the plaintiff (but they dol!l): they are designed to punish the defendant if the jury believes their conduct merits a penalty beyond simply the economic loss involved. Unfortunately, this has caused too many juries to....well, you decide. Are punitive damages a problem? And please keep in mind that plaintifs attorneys receive 1/3 of the punitive damages. Yet this raises the issue of whether some plaintiffs receive windfalls while others receive nothing. For example, in BMW, Inc. v Gore (Ala 1994 )646 So2d 619, a man sued because the brand new car he purchased had been partially repainted to cover damage caused while it was being shipped to the dealer. The jury awarded million in punitive damages. The Alabama Supreme Court later reduced the punitive damages to a more "constitutionally reasonable" $2 million, noting that in a case hir s4 virtually identical to plaintiffs, another had received no punitive damages. 646 So2d at 626Explanation / Answer
the damages which are not simple and which the user of defendant of the issue will paid by the service provider is called punitive damages. when the service provider fails to deliver their words as it is, then defendant goes for this kind of claiming their inefficiency. Here we not only looks at the damage money paid to the defendant, we also must look about the failure of the service provider.
First, the service provider fails to deliver the words which committed to the customer. Customers have the expectations and with this they buy products and services. If the service provider failed at this, this should be comensated to customer in different manner or form. So, I think these are good and acceptable.
the other side of the coin is, if these kind of damage payments are not there, then firms give false promoises and violate those. ultimately the consumer will be looser. the firms should not give wrong promises, wrong commitments etc to the customers, if they give any promise it must be achieved or fulfilled. In this aspects, these kind of damages are good to both the firm and customer.
These are good to the firm, means, if they made any mistake from their side, it is compensating to the customer. so to minimize these kind of problems, they work with more care and consideration.