A deaf employee who worked as a package handler repeatedly sought the reasonable
ID: 438950 • Letter: A
Question
A deaf employee who worked as a package handler repeatedly sought the reasonable accommodation of having an American Sign Language interpreter made available so that he could understand what was being said at employee meetings and training sessions. Managers ignored these requests for two years before relenting and making an interpreter available for some meetings. The employee sued Federal Express under the ADA for failure to reasonably accommodate, won his case, and was awarded punitive damages of $100,000. 1. What were the legal issues in this case? What did the court decide? 2. Legally, what is the standard for determining whether punitive damages should be imposed? What is some of the evidence that this standard was met in this case? 3. Why does the existence of the FedEx ADA compliance policy fail to show that the company was actingExplanation / Answer
A federal jury today found in favor of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in its employment discrimination lawsuit against Federal Express Corporation (FedEx) for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). EEOC had charged the Memphis, Tenn.-based global shipping giant with failing to provide a reasonable accommodation to Ronald Lockhart, a profoundly deaf employee who worked as a package handler at the company's Baltimore Ramp. The suit charged Federal Express with violating the ADA when it failed to provide reasonable accommodations to Lockhart in the form of American Sign Language interpreters, despite his repeated requests. The jury found FedEx liable for punitive damages in the amount of $100,000 for its knowing failure to accommodate Lockhart as well as compensatory damages of $8,000 for the loss of the accommodation itself. The EEOC's lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Maryland on September 30, 2004 (Case No. 04 CV-3129) after the agency first attempted to reach a voluntary pre-litigation settlement. "This verdict sends victims and their employers a big message,"said EEOC Regional Attorney Jacqueline McNair. "Employers must provide reasonable accommodations for qualified individuals with disabilities. It is the employer's responsibility to demonstrate that it is committed to fully adhere to the requirements of the ADA on behalf of disabled employees, and that they are not to be treated like second-class citizens." Title I of the ADA prohibits employment discrimination against people with disabilities in the private sector and state and local governments. In Fiscal Year 2005, the EEOC received 14,893 charge filings from individuals alleging disability discrimination, filed 46 ADA lawsuits against employers, and recovered more than $48 million in total monetary benefits through enforcement and litigation.