Readreview Thecity Of Charlottecase And Answer The Following ✓ Solved

Read/review the City of Charlotte case, and answer the following questions:

  1. What is the dominant strategy (operational excellence; customer intimacy; product innovation)?

  2. What are the secondary strategies?

  3. Create a Strategy Map supporting your dominant strategy. A strategy map is a balanced scorecard with objectives for each area in the card; the areas are: Financial, Customer, Process, Workforce.

  4. What are A level positions in support of your strategy?

  5. What are some critical metrics?

Paper For Above Instructions

The City of Charlotte case presents various strategic approaches to enhance operations and achieve competitive advantages. Understanding these strategies is vital for a locale like Charlotte, which aims to balance operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and innovation. This paper will analyze the dominant strategies, secondary strategies, provide a strategy map for the identified strategy, discuss A level positions, and outline critical metrics.

Dominant Strategy

In reviewing the City of Charlotte case, it becomes evident that the dominant strategy is centered around operational excellence. This strategy focuses on delivering efficient services consistently while maximizing the value derived from financial resources and operational capabilities. Operational excellence is crucial for city governance and management, especially for urban planning, public safety, and infrastructure development.

Secondary Strategies

While operational excellence is the primary strategy, Charlotte also implements several secondary strategies to support its overall objectives. These include:

  • Customer Intimacy: Charlotte prioritizes understanding community needs and preferences to tailor services effectively.

  • Product Innovation: The city encourages technological advancements and innovative approaches, particularly in public services and infrastructure projects.

Strategy Map

A Strategy Map is a visual representation that aligns strategic objectives across four perspectives: financial, customer, process, and workforce. Below is a brief outline of objectives within each area supporting the operational excellence strategy:

Financial Objectives

  • Maximize budget efficiency through effective resource allocation.

  • Increase revenue through enhanced service delivery.

Customer Objectives

  • Improve citizen engagement and satisfaction.

  • Enhance service accessibility for all community members.

Process Objectives

  • Streamline departmental processes to ensure timely service delivery.

  • Implement technology solutions for improved operational efficiencies.

Workforce Objectives

  • Invest in workforce training and development.

  • Promote a culture of accountability and empowerment.

A Level Positions Supporting the Strategy

To implement the dominant strategy effectively, several A level positions are necessary to ensure alignment with organizational goals:

  • City Manager: Responsible for overall strategy implementation and operational oversight.

  • Chief Financial Officer: Manages financial planning and budget allocation to support operational needs.

  • Director of Community Engagement: Focuses on fostering relationships and understanding community needs.

  • Chief Innovation Officer: Encourages and integrates new technologies in public services.

Critical Metrics

To assess the success of the implemented strategies, specific critical metrics should be tracked:

  • Service Delivery Time: Measure the time taken to deliver services.

  • Citizen Satisfaction Score: Conduct surveys to determine satisfaction levels.

  • Budget Variance: Monitor budget adherence and efficiency.

  • Technology Adoption Rate: Evaluate the implementation of technology solutions in workflows.

In conclusion, the City of Charlotte case emphasizes the importance of adopting a strategy rooted in operational excellence while leveraging secondary strategies like customer intimacy and product innovation. The creation of a strategy map enables the city to visualize objectives and align its workforce, financial goals, and processes towards achieving its vision. By establishing critical metrics, the city can continually assess its performance, ensuring that it meets the evolving needs of its residents and maximizes the efficacy of its operations.

References

  • Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2006). Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies. Harvard Business Review Press.

  • Porter, M. E. (1996). What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review.

  • Mintzberg, H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. Prentice Hall.

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management.

  • Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. (2008). Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 21st Century. Harvard Business Review.

  • Boyne, G. A. (2003). Sources of Public Service Improvement: A Critical Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business School Press.

  • George, B. (2003). The Servant Leader: How to Build a Creative Team, Develop Great Morale, and Improve Bottom-Line Performance. Harper Business.

  • Drucker, P. F. (2007). The Effective Executive: The Definitive Guide to Getting the Right Things Done. Harper Business.