Response to Discussion Post Madeline Maury RE: Discussion Prompt ✓ Solved

Response to Discussion Post Madeline Maury RE: Discussion Prompt

It is important to conduct a literature review because a literature review supplies the premise of proficiency on topics (Schmidt & Brown, 2018). It halts replication of data and recognizes researchers that have provided the content (Schmidt & Brown, 2018). A literature review also recognizes missing information or scarce data in research, and it identifies conflicts in prior studies along with unanswered questions from other research (Schmidt & Brown, 2018).

Major Types of Literature Reviews

There are four major types of literature reviews discussed in the field:

  1. Narrative Reviews: These are among the most commonly used reviews and tend to be particularly subjective. They are often found in scholarly and approved sources and are generally not concerned with broad research techniques, configurations, or settings (Schmidt & Brown, 2018).

  2. Integrative Reviews: These are scholarly writings that incorporate published research and articles that respond to questions of interest. They are peer-reviewed, thus being objective, and can synthesize information from various types of research (Schmidt & Brown, 2018).

  3. Meta-Analysis: This type of systematic review extracts findings from various studies on corresponding topics and examines them using a statistical approach. It contains published and unpublished work and is useful when substantial mixed trials are not attainable (Schmidt & Brown, 2018).

  4. Systematic Reviews: Considered the highest level and most objective type of review, systematic reviews require a precise and accurate process for investigating the evidence. They encompass studies focusing on identical clinical problems and use techniques to reduce bias (Schmidt & Brown, 2018).

Essential Components of a Quality Literature Review

When conducting a literature review, the researcher must search for specifications in the article’s publication, summarize the main points, identify gaps in research, and assess the publication's contributions to the topic (Schmidt & Brown, 2018). The information should be ascertained via a primary source, meaning the original information was provided by the person who created it, or via a secondary source that examines content provided by a primary source (Schmidt & Brown, 2018).

Conclusion

Conducting quality literature reviews is essential for establishing a solid foundation upon which to base research and clinical practices. Various types of literature reviews serve different purposes, and a comprehensive understanding of these types is critical. Researchers must also ensure that their literature reviews are thorough and consider both primary and secondary sources for a balanced perspective (Schmidt & Brown, 2018).

References

  • Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2018). Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Queralt-Rosinach, N., Stupp, G. S., Li, T. S., Mayers, M., Hoatlin, M. E., Might, M., Good, B. M., & Su, A. I. (2020). Structured reviews for data and knowledge-driven research. Database: The Journal of Biological Databases & Curation, 2020, 1–12.

  • Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage.

  • Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Sage Publications.

  • Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students. Sage Publications.

  • Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108.

  • Fink, A. (2010). Conducting research literature reviews: From the Internet to paper. Sage Publications.

  • Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ, 320(7226), 50-52.

  • Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach. Sage Publications.

  • Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews. Sage Publications.