Risk Management and Analysis Part 1 Within any healthcare org ✓ Solved

Within any healthcare organization, there are different prevalent risks to the community, the patient, the staff, and the healthcare organization at large. This means that risk management in any healthcare organization is of great significance to ensure there is proper development, assessment, close monitoring, and implementation of the potential risks to totally prevent or minimize the exposure of risks (Allen-Duck et al., 2017).

In this paper, we are going to carry out an examination of a risk management program with a safe care and patient environment, with the main focus being on the community. The management program selected is the fall prevention strategy used in a community setting.

The Risk Management Plan and Rationale

The risk management plan is the reduction and prevention program. This program mainly targets the geriatric population that is within the community. The main focus of the program is on ensuring the identification of different people in the community who are at risk of falls and ensuring that there is proper implementation and provision of the evidence-based interventions.

In addressing the fall reduction, prevention is the main step (Haddad et al., 2019). The rationale for choosing the fall prevention and reduction program as the significant type of risk management plan is due to the fact that falls have a major risk to both the health and independence of the geriatric population. Falls are the leading cause of injuries and death among the geriatric population, which also affect healthcare costs and the health of individuals. It is important to realize that falls can be prevented.

The program gives a clear picture of how falls can be prevented in a community setting, allowing the geriatric population to successfully maintain their health and independence.

The Standard Administrative Processes and Steps

The process of risk management in a healthcare organization involves carefully identifying the context, the process of risk analysis, risk evaluation, and risk management. Identifying the context involves understanding the different areas that are of high priority which need risk management with regard to the care that patients receive. Another step that is significant is the identification of risks by making sure that one is aware of different risks within healthcare services and the primary environment (Simsekler et al., 2018).

After risk analysis, comprehension of the already identified risks occurs. This is done through analyzing the primary causes, the intensity of the identified risks, and the actions of control available against the identified risks. Evaluating the already identified risks is essential for prioritizing based on the severity of the risk, typically using the risk analysis score. Risk management is the final step, where appropriate measures are implemented to prevent and minimize risk occurrence (Moncada & Mire, 2017).

The healthcare sector significantly impacts individuals, making quality of care a crucial marker for competition in the health market. Thus, an effective risk management procedure in healthcare organizations is necessary. For better outcomes in the healthcare department, implementing Total Quality Management programs is vital. Through this program, patients experience lower costs, increased satisfaction, and the organization can manage various risks more effectively (Mahoney et al., 2017).

Cultural Integration of Risk Management

A culture that embraces risk management using evidence-based guidelines is essential for successfully achieving risk management programs. In chosen communities, elderly individuals reported high rates of falls and thus were identified as priority areas. Consequently, a fall prevention and reduction program was implemented due to these high fall rates.

The Key Organizations and Agencies

Some of the agencies responsible for regulating the provision of quality care include: The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (JCAHO); the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); the Joint Commission and Healthcare Quality Promotion (DHQP); and the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA).

AHRQ primarily focuses on performing research to improve the quality of care provided to patients, including their safety. JCAHO ensures that healthcare institutions can provide quality care to patients (Jiménez-Rodríguez et al., 2018). DHQP is responsible for patient protection, ensuring various healthcare providers promote quality care, while NCQA ensures that care plans meet required quality standards. The Joint Commission works towards enhancing the quality of care, ensuring patient safety, and reducing medical errors in healthcare institutions.

The Process of Evaluation and Compliance

The selected risk management program aligns with the requirements outlined by the Joint Commission, promoting patient safety and quality care. DHQP requirements are also met by improving patient safety. The Joint Commission plays a significant role in ensuring different healthcare institutions can prevent falls and associated injuries (Lam et al., 2018). The fall prevention program educates individuals on the significance of preventing falls, and essential safety information is effectively communicated to the community and various healthcare providers.

It is important to note that the prevention of falls is everyone’s responsibility.

The Recommendations

There is a need to integrate patient education about the risk of falls into the chosen program. The Joint Commission supports raising awareness regarding fall risks. Different stakeholders should be educated on relevant fall prevention strategies. Furthermore, adopting an interprofessional approach in the fall prevention program is crucial. The Joint Commission should establish an interprofessional team to adopt a comprehensive approach in addressing fall reduction and prevention.

Standardized and validated tools should be employed to identify the different risk factors for falls in the community. Implementing post-fall management and reevaluating individuals who have sustained falls is essential for informing improvement efforts.

References

• Allen-Duck, A., Robinson, J. C., & Stewart, M. W. (2017). Healthcare quality: a concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 52(4), 1-20. Retrieved from [URL]
• Haddad, Y. K., Bergen, G., & Florence, C. (2019). Estimating the economic burden related to older adult falls by state. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 25(2), E17. Retrieved from [URL]
• Jiménez-Rodríguez, E., Feria-Dománguez, J. M., & Sebastián-Lacave, A. (2018). Assessing the Health-Care Risk: The Clinical-VaR, a Key Indicator for Sound Management. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(4), 639. Retrieved from [URL]
• Lam, M. B., Figueroa, J. F., Feyman, Y., Reimold, K. E., Orav, E. J., & Jha, A. K. (2018). Association between patient outcomes and accreditation in US hospitals: observational study. BMJ, 363. Retrieved from [URL]
• Mahoney, J. E., Clemson, L., Schlotthauer, A., Mack, K. A., Shea, T., Gobel, V., & Cech, S. (2017). Modified Delphi consensus to suggest key elements of stepping on falls prevention program. Frontiers in Public Health, 5, 21. Retrieved from [URL]
• Moncada, L. V. V., & Mire, L. G. (2017). Preventing falls in older persons. American Family Physician, 96(4), 10-11. Retrieved from [URL]
• Simsekler, M. E., Ward, J. R., & Clarkson, P. J. (2018). Design for patient safety: a systems-based risk identification framework. Ergonomics, 61(8), 1151-1170. Retrieved from [URL]