Running Head Immigration1immigration4immigrationbruce W Norcise ✓ Solved

The United States and some of the western nations have continued to carry the burden of both illegal and legal immigrants. More immigrants continue to find their ways to some of the developed nations with the hope that they will find a peaceful place to settle. It is for this reason why the need to have a policy that controls the trends of the immigrants emerges. Despite the fact that there are immigration laws in place, immigration trends continue to change, thus calling for the need to come up with more updated policies.

It is imperative to hear out the immigrants before deporting them to their nations of origin. The illegal immigrants should be given a hearing in the nations they seek asylum before deportation because of different reasons. The first reason relates to humanity. The United States and other developed nations are where they are in terms of civilization and democracy because they value humanity (Casarico, Facchini, & Frattini, 2015). The reason why they should give illegal immigrants a hearing is to understand the story from the perspective of the immigrants.

Some immigrants choose to leave their nations of origin because the situations in their nations are unbearable. Sending such people to their nations of origin can, to some extent, become inhuman. The second reason why the immigrants should be given a hearing by the nations they are seeking asylum is that the developed nations have an obligation or an elderly brother role. Nations such as the United States, are big brothers to developing nations, and that is why they, at times, offer free aid (Wright, Levy, & Citrin, 2016). As a big brother, the United States should consider the life of immigrants.

Even though it is illegal for a person to be in a foreign nation, it is also important to note that, at times, people are forced by circumstances (Wright et al. 2016). In desperate cases, it is imperative to reason with the immigrants. The third reason why the immigrants should be offered a chance for hearing relates to the impacts they might have on the host nation. It is imperative to note that not all immigrants are unskilled or illiterate. Retaining immigrants who have proven that they mean no harm to the nation comes with possible positive impacts (Heer, 2018). The reason for hearing them is to analyze them and determine if it would be suitable to retain them. Retaining immigrants who are skilled has a positive impact on the economy and diversity of the hosting nation.

Immigration is an issue that continues to give some of the developed nations and especially nations in the west restless nights. Globalization has played its part in promoting immigration. Whereas nations have been fighting hard to avoid illegal immigration cases, cases of immigration increase by the day. It is, therefore, critical to have a policy in place that will help to deal with cases of illegal immigration. Without contradiction, illegal immigration is something that does not deserve the support of any human. However, it is imperative to consider the well-being of illegal immigrants. Such are humans who might be suffering, and taking them back home would be the same as directing them to their deaths, which is in all means and definitions inhuman.

Paper For Above Instructions

Immigration policies have significantly shaped the demographic landscape of the United States and many other developed nations. As immigration trends evolve, it becomes increasingly essential to revisit existing laws and frameworks that govern the entry and status of immigrants. This paper aims to explore the importance of providing hearings for illegal immigrants before deportation, underscoring the moral, legal, and social implications of such actions.

The Humanitarian Perspective

At the core of the immigration debate is the treatment of human beings seeking refuge from dire circumstances. Many individuals migrate to escape war, persecution, poverty, or environmental disasters. According to Casarico, Facchini, and Frattini (2015), understanding an immigrant's story is crucial for crafting empathetic immigration policies. By providing immigrants a platform to share their experiences, they can reveal the human side of the immigration crisis, often overshadowed by political rhetoric. The act of deporting an individual without allowance for a hearing disregards their humanity, effectively punishing them for the circumstances they were forced to flee.

Legal Obligations and Asylum Seekers

Apart from the moral obligation, nations have legal responsibilities regarding the treatment of asylum seekers. International law, including the 1951 Refugee Convention, affirms the right of individuals to seek asylum and prohibits refoulement, which is the return of refugees to territories where their lives or freedoms would be threatened. Wright, Levy, and Citrin (2016) emphasize the importance of legal frameworks in guiding immigration policies and ensuring humane treatment. Deportation without due process could violate these international legal obligations and expose nations to criticism from human rights organizations.

The Role of Developed Nations

As powerful entities on the global stage, developed nations like the United States often assume a “big brother” role, providing assistance to developing countries. Wright et al. (2016) argue that this relationship necessitates a commitment to upholding human rights, including the rights of immigrants and refugees. By hearing the cases of illegal immigrants, states can fulfill their moral and ethical obligation to provide safety and support to those in need. This reinforces the values of democracy and civilization that such nations purport to uphold.

Economic Considerations

Skilled immigrants contribute positively to the economy. As Heer (2018) points out, not all immigrants lack education or skills; many possess valuable expertise that can benefit host countries. By conducting hearings, nations can identify immigrants who could enhance workforce diversity and economic productivity. Retaining individuals who can fill labor shortages or contribute to sectors like technology, healthcare, and education could lead to significant economic advancements. Thus, hearing immigrants before deportation serves both humanitarian and economic interests.

The Diversity Argument

Diversity is a hallmark of the United States, often viewed as a melting pot of cultures and ideas. Immigrants enrich society by introducing different perspectives, customs, and innovations. As globalization progresses, the mixing of cultures is imperative for fostering creativity and inclusivity. By allowing immigrants to present their cases for asylum or residency, nations can ensure they are not only complying with legal demands but also enhancing their societal fabric.

Policy Recommendations

It is vital for nations to revise and improve their immigration policies to create a more humane system. Policies should incorporate a structured hearing process for illegal immigrants, allowing for individual assessments that acknowledge their unique circumstances. Additionally, nations should invest in resources to support immigrants during their hearings, ensuring they have access to legal representation and counseling services. Emphasizing community engagement can also foster better understanding and cooperation between immigrants and local populations.

Conclusion

Immigration remains a contentious issue for developed nations, yet it is critical to approach this matter with empathy and understanding. Providing hearing opportunities for illegal immigrants is not merely a legal obligation but a reflection of humanity. The stories of immigrants are often tales of hardship and resilience, deserving of recognition. By re-evaluating immigration policies to incorporate a hearing process, nations can ensure a fairer, more humane treatment of vulnerable populations while simultaneously recognizing the economic and cultural benefits of immigration.

References

• Casarico, A., Facchini, G., & Frattini, T. (2015). Illegal immigration: policy perspectives and challenges. CESifo Economic Studies.
• Heer, D. (2018). Immigration in America's future: Social science findings and the policy debate. Routledge.
• Wright, M., Levy, M., & Citrin, J. (2016). Public attitudes toward immigration policy across the legal/illegal divide: The role of categorical and attribute-based decision-making. Political Behavior, 38(1).
• UNHCR. (2021). The 1951 Refugee Convention. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
• Chauvet, L., & Collier, P. (2004). What are the Secrets of Successful Refugee Policy? The Review of Economics and Statistics.
• Abrego, L. J. (2014). Legal Consciousness of Undocumented Latinos: Fear and Stigma. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare.
• Borjas, G. J. (1999). The Economic Analysis of Immigration. Handbook of Labor Economics, 3A.
• Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. (2006). Immigrant America: A Portrait. University of California Press.
• Orrenius, P. M., & Zavodny, M. (2019). The Economic Impact of Immigration: A Survey of the Evidence. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
• National Immigration Forum. (2020). The Economic Contributions of Immigrants in the U.S.