Sheet1 Financial Spreadsheet Company Name: Financial Ratio ✓ Solved

Prepare a financial analysis report for the company using the provided financial ratios. Include commentary on the ratios in comparison to industry averages to evaluate the company's financial health.

Paper For Above Instructions

Financial analysis is an essential aspect of understanding a company's performance and position in its industry. By examining financial ratios, stakeholders can gain valuable insights into a company's operational efficiency, liquidity, profitability, and overall financial stability. In this report, we will analyze the financial ratios of a company, juxtaposing them with industry averages to provide a comprehensive view of its financial health.

1. Current Ratio

The current ratio is a liquidity ratio that measures a company's ability to pay short-term obligations with its short-term assets. In this case, the company reports a current ratio of 2x, which indicates that it has twice as many current assets as current liabilities. This ratio is above the industry average of 2, suggesting that the company is in a strong position to meet its short-term debts. A current ratio above 1 is generally considered satisfactory, as it demonstrates the firm’s capacity to cover its liabilities without the need for additional financing (Brigham & Ehrhardt, 2013).

2. Total Debt/Total Assets

The total debt to total assets ratio measures the proportion of a company's assets that are financed through debt. With a ratio of 30%, the company has a moderate level of debt compared to its assets, indicating a lower financial risk. A lower percentage relative to industry peers suggests that the company may be better positioned in terms of financial stability and risk management (Higgins, 2012). This ratio underscores prudent financial management and a balanced approach to leveraging debt.

3. Times Interest Earned

The times interest earned ratio, which stands at 7x, indicates the company's capacity to meet its interest obligations. This means the company earns seven times more than required to cover its interest expenses. Typically, a ratio higher than 3 is regarded as a healthy sign, indicating that the company can comfortably handle its debt obligations (Koller et al., 2015). The significant buffer that this ratio provides hints at a financially sound organization with a strong profit generation capability.

4. EBITDA Coverage

EBITDA coverage, reported at 9x, assesses a company's ability to pay off its debt obligations, including interest and principal repayments, with its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). A higher ratio indicates greater earnings available to cover these obligations. In comparison to the industry average, this company's ratio suggests a healthy margin that can support debt repayment and operational expenses (Damodaran, 2012).

5. Inventory Turnover

Inventory turnover is a measure of how many times inventory is sold and replaced over a period. A turnover rate of 10x suggests efficient inventory management, as the company is able to sell and restock its inventory ten times in a year. This is favorable compared to the industry average and indicates effective sales strategies and lower holding costs, which ultimately bolster the company’s profitability (Harrison & Horngren, 2016).

6. Days Sales Outstanding (DSO)

The Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) metric of 24 days shows the average number of days it takes for the company to collect payment after a sale has been made. This is an excellent figure compared to industry benchmarks. A lower DSO indicates efficient credit policies and effective collection processes, highlighting the company's capability to maintain liquidity (Niskanen & Niskanen, 2002).

7. Fixed Assets Turnover

With a fixed assets turnover ratio of 6x, this implies the company generates six dollars in revenue for every dollar of fixed assets. This efficiency suggests optimal utilization of fixed capital investments that enhance profitability. Compared to industry standards, maintaining such a ratio can significantly benefit the company’s competitive stance (Ross, Westerfield, & Jaffe, 2013).

8. Total Assets Turnover

The total assets turnover ratio of 3x indicates that the company generates three dollars of revenue for each dollar of total assets. This level of turnover suggests that the company is effectively driven in utilizing its assets to drive sales, thereby positioning itself favorably against its peers (Brigham & Ehrhardt, 2013).

9. Profit Margin

The profit margin of 3% demonstrates the percentage of revenue that translates into profit. While this figure may appear modest when compared to industry leaders, it indicates an opportunity for operational improvements and cost management strategies to uplift profitability. Understanding where margins are squeezed can help the management to refine their business strategies (Higgins, 2012).

10. Return on Total Assets (ROA)

A Return on Assets (ROA) of 9% signifies that the company generates 9 cents of profit for every dollar of assets utilized. This is a reasonable performance indicator, showcasing the company’s efficiency in asset utilization for profit generation compared to its competitors (Koller et al., 2015).

11. Return on Common Equity (ROE)

Lastly, a Return on Common Equity of 12.86% indicates how effectively a company is using equity financing to generate profits. This figure implies that for every dollar in equity, the company earns approximately 12.86 cents in profit. When viewing this in the context of the industry average, a higher ROE signals a strong investment potential for shareholders (Damodaran, 2012).

In conclusion, the financial ratios presented are critical indicators that paint a comprehensive picture of the company's financial health. Comparatively analyzing these ratios with their respective industry averages suggests that the company is in a robust position to tackle financial obligations, manage inventory efficiently, and generate profits. Stakeholders should monitor these ratios closely and utilize them in strategic decision-making to drive growth.

References

  • Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2013). Financial Management: Theory & Practice. Cengage Learning.

  • Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset. Wiley.

  • Harrison, W. T., & Horngren, C. T. (2016). Financial Accounting. Pearson.

  • Higgins, R. C. (2012). Analysis for Financial Management. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

  • Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2015). Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. Wiley.

  • Niskanen, J., & Niskanen, M. (2002). Financial Performance and Ownership Structure: A Case Study of Finnish Companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(5-6), 683-712.

  • Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2013). Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill Education.