Substance-related and Addictive disorders Evaluate the effect ✓ Solved

Evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic approaches for clients diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders. Describe the client. Note: Do not use the client’s actual name. Explain your therapeutic approach with the client, including the perceived effectiveness of your approach. Identify any additional information about this client that may potentially impact expected outcomes. Provide specific recommendations for the client to help them in determining why they are not progressing and what your suggested treatment plan consists of. It is useful to consult the Prochaska and DiClement model.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

Substance-related and addictive disorders are significant public health issues, affecting not only the individuals who suffer from these disorders but also their families and communities. Therapeutic approaches in this realm can vary widely, encompassing counseling, medication, group therapy, and other modalities. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of therapeutic approaches for a fictional client diagnosed with a substance use disorder. Utilizing the Prochaska and DiClement model, this paper outlines the therapeutic approach taken, its perceived effectiveness, and recommendations for enhancing the client's progress in treatment.

Client Description

The client, whom we will refer to as John (a pseudonym), is a 34-year-old male struggling with opioid dependence following a sports-related injury. Initially prescribed opioids for pain management, John developed a substance use disorder characterized by the inability to control his use of the drug despite significant negative consequences, including job loss and strained family relationships. John has attempted various treatment plans, including detoxification and multiple rehabilitation programs, with mixed results, resulting in a cycle of relapse and recovery.

Therapeutic Approach

In addressing John's substance use disorder, a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) approach was implemented, augmented by contingency management and motivational interviewing techniques. The cognitive-behavioral framework helps clients understand the interplay between their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. The goal is to identify cognitive distortions contributing to substance use and develop healthier coping mechanisms. This approach was deemed particularly effective because it empowers clients to take an active role in their treatment, fostering personal accountability and self-efficacy.

Contingency management was integrated as a method of providing tangible rewards for positive behavior change, such as maintaining sobriety or attending therapy sessions. This has been effective in reinforcing John’s commitment to his recovery. Motivational interviewing was also utilized to enhance John's intrinsic motivation to change by resolving ambivalence and exploring his personal reasons for pursuing a sober lifestyle.

Perceived Effectiveness

Therapeutic sessions have indicated a gradual increase in John's self-awareness and accountability regarding his addiction. Initially resistant to recognizing the role of his thought patterns in his substance use, John now expresses an understanding of how negative thinking perpetuates his addiction cycle. His engagement in therapy has improved, and he is completing homework assignments regularly. While John has not achieved full sobriety yet, the therapeutic progress is evident through increased motivation and openness to treatment, indicating that the therapeutic approach is effective, albeit with challenges that remain.

Additional Information

John's journey in recovery is also influenced by several factors outside of therapy. He has a history of depression, which often complicates his treatment. Additionally, a lack of social support due to strained family relationships poses a potential barrier to his success. Understanding these factors is crucial, as they may necessitate additional therapeutic strategies such as family therapy or psychiatric evaluation for medication management to address his depressive symptoms adequately.

Recommendations for Progress

To enhance John's chances of success in therapy and recovery, specific recommendations are proposed:

  • Increase Emotional Support: John should seek to rebuild familial relationships and connect with support groups, which would provide peer support and understanding.

  • Incorporate Mindfulness Practices: Techniques such as mindfulness meditation may help John manage his stress and cravings more effectively.

  • Explore Co-occurring Disorders: A comprehensive evaluation for depression and its treatment may improve John's mental health and facilitate a more effective recovery.

  • Continuity of Care: Ensuring consistent follow-up appointments and ongoing therapy sessions will aid in preventing relapse and maintaining progress.

Conclusion

The therapeutic approach taken with John – based on cognitive-behavioral principles, combined with motivational interviewing and contingency management – has demonstrated effectiveness in fostering John’s engagement in recovery and his understanding of the underlying factors contributing to his substance use. By addressing John's unique needs and enhancing his emotional support systems, as well as addressing co-occurring mental health disorders, expectations for treatment outcomes may improve. Continuous evaluation and adaptation of the treatment plan will be necessary to support John on his road to recovery.

References

  • Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

  • American Nurses Association. (2014). Psychiatric-mental health nursing: Scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

  • Gabbard, G.O. (2014). Gabbard’s treatment of psychiatric disorder (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publication.

  • Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1986). Toward a comprehensive model of change. In J. O. Prochaska & C. C. DiClemente (Eds.), The transtheoretical approach: Handbook for therapists. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

  • Becker, H., & Hile, A. (2008). The effectiveness of various therapeutic approaches in treating addiction: A review of the literature. Journal of Substance Use, 13(5), 267-283.

  • Khantzian, E. J. (1997). The self-medication hypothesis of addictive disorders: Focus on heroin and cocaine dependence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(11), 1601-1606.

  • Smith, J. E., & Hesse, M. (2008). Substance use and psychiatric co-morbidity: A review and a view towards a guided therapy approach. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(7), 1056-1070.

  • Gonzalez, C. (2017). Family therapy and addiction: A systemic approach to understanding the dynamics. Journal of Family Therapy, 39(2), 154-172.

  • National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2020). Principles of addiction treatment: A research-based guide (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/principles-addiction-treatment-research-based-guide/third-edition