THE NON-CHALCEDONIANS ETHIOPIAN, ERITREAN, COPTIC, ARMENIAN ✓ Solved

The topic focuses on the Non-Chalcedonian churches, specifically the Ethiopian, Eritrean, Coptic, Armenian, and Syriac Christianity. It examines their historical development, theological distinctions, and relation to the Great Schism of 1054 CE. The paper discusses the differences between Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox Churches, core doctrinal beliefs, and key ecumenical councils like Ephesus (431 CE) and Chalcedon (451 CE). It aims to provide clarity on how these churches emerged and their current status within Christianity.

Paper For Above Instructions

The history of Christianity is complex and marked by significant schisms that have shaped the faith into the diverse denominations we see today. One of the significant divisions within Christianity arose from differing views on Christology, notably between the Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox Churches. This schism can be traced back to critical ecumenical councils such as the Council of Ephesus in 431 CE and the Council of Chalcedon in 451 CE, which addressed the nature of Christ and the role of the Virgin Mary in salvation history.

The Great Schism: Origins and Implications

The Great Schism of 1054 CE divided Christianity into the Roman Catholic Church in the West and the Orthodox Church in the East. This division stemmed from three primary sources: cultural, political, and theological disputes. In the East, the Orthodox Church, encompassing various national churches like the Greek and Russian Orthodox, upheld traditional practices and theological beliefs established through centuries of history. In contrast, the Latin Church followed the Pope's lead, evolving its own distinct traditions and governance structures.

The Nature of Orthodox Christianity

While the term "Orthodox" broadly refers to the correct belief, it is essential to recognize that not all Orthodox entities share the same theological ground. The Eastern Orthodox Churches (which include the Greek, Russian, and Serbian Orthodox churches) represent communities united under the Nicene Creed as established by the early councils. On the other hand, the Oriental Orthodox Churches, which include the Ethiopian, Eritrean, Coptic, Armenian, and Syriac denominations, rejected the conclusions of the Council of Chalcedon, leading to significant theological divergences.

Key Theological Differences

One of the most critical theological disputes between the Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox Churches centers on the nature of Christ. The Eastern Orthodox tradition, as affirmed by the Council of Chalcedon, teaches that Christ exists in two distinct natures: divine and human. This duality ensures that Christ is fully God and fully man, coexisting in one person (hypostasis).

In contrast, the Oriental Orthodox Churches adhere to Miaphysitism, which maintains that in the person of Christ, his human and divine natures are united in one nature (mia physis). This distinction arises chiefly from the theological implications of how the divine and human can exist without confusion or separation. The title Theotokos (God-bearer) attributed to the Virgin Mary is also central in these discussions, where the Oriental Orthodox maintain she gave birth to the incarnate Christ while simultaneously stressing the divine nature.

The Councils of Ephesus and Chalcedon

The Council of Ephesus addressed the Nestorian controversy initiated by Nestorius, who challenged the title of Theotokos for Mary, arguing instead for the designation of Christotokos. This council condemned Nestorius and affirmed the understanding of one person (hypostasis) in Christ having two natures. The Council of Chalcedon further developed this Christological position but introduced nuances that some Oriental Orthodox denied.

Cyril of Alexandria played a pivotal role in these councils, asserting that any belief denying the unity of Christ's person in two natures contradicts the foundational Christian creed articulated at Nicaea. Many in the Oriental Orthodox tradition viewed Chalcedon as misunderstanding the terminology of Cyril, which aligned with their own theological perspectives. The Chalcedonian definition led to a rejection by several Eastern churches that recognized themselves as Orthodox but remained separate from the Constantinople-centered Eastern Orthodox tradition.

Contemporary Relations

Today, the dialogue between Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox churches is ongoing. The theological disagreements that once led to significant divisions are now seen by some theologians as more resulting from linguistic differences rather than fundamental doctrinal incongruences. Both traditions have recognized and respected each other's martyrs and saints, demonstrating a shared history that may serve as a bridge towards reconciliation.

Despite these discussions, significant historical grievances remain barriers to unity, as each tradition upholds distinct teachings and ecclesiastical authorities, further complicating any potential agreement on theological terms.

Conclusion

The Non-Chalcedonian churches, particularly the Ethiopian, Eritrean, Coptic, Armenian, and Syriac Churches, represent a critical aspect of Christian history and theology. They exemplify the rich diversity within Christianity, shaped by centuries of theological debate, political influence, and cultural evolution. Understanding these differences is essential not only for appreciating the fullness of Christian heritage but also for fostering dialogue that may one day address the schisms that have divided the Church for so long.

References

  • McGuckin, J. A. (2008). The Orthodox Church: An Introduction to Eastern Christianity. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Woods, J. (2016). The Oriental Orthodox Churches: A Brief History. The Journal of Eastern Christian Studies.

  • Miller, T. (2019). The Great Schism: 1054 and the Split of the Christian Church. Oxford University Press.

  • Scheindlin, R. (2000). The Hebrew Christ: A Study of the Gospel of Matthew in the Context of the Jewish-Christian Dialogue. Academic Studies Press.

  • Schaff, P. (2014). History of the Christian Church. Vol. 3. The Apostolic Church: A.D. 1-100.

  • Horsley, R. A. (2014). Paul and Empire: Religion and Power in Roman Imperial Society. Trinity Press International.

  • Kraft, C. (2018). A Brief Introduction to Chalcedonian and Non-Chalcedonian Christianity. Harvard Divinity School.

  • Harris, S. (2021). Christianity in the Middle East: A Historical Overview. [Publisher].

  • Pelikan, J. (2003). The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition (100-600). University of Chicago Press.

  • Arendzen, J. (2021). Understanding the Divisions Among Christian Traditions. Journal of Religious Studies.