The primary purpose of this assignment is to help you understand ✓ Solved

The primary purpose of this assignment is to help you understand that the Literature Review is an integral part of any research project and how it lays the groundwork for the investigation you will do. In Module 2, you will complete an annotated bibliography on a topic of your choice in which you will be required to find at least ten sources of various types, write a short summary of the information found in each source, and write an evaluation of the source’s credibility, reliability, currency, possible bias, and usefulness with respect to your topic.

The literature review builds on the annotated bibliography. For the topic you chose for your annotated bibliography in Module 2, complete the following: Review your annotated bibliography. Define a problem statement that, in your opinion, would be useful and practical for you to investigate, based on the information presented in your annotated bibliography sources (and others if needed). Organize your sources by sorting and classifying their findings in a meaningful way, always considering your original topic and problem. Write a literature review that would seem to offer the greatest potential for developing a good theoretical framework, using 7 to 10 references. All of these can be from your annotated bibliography, or you can use others in addition to those in your annotated bibliography. Develop the theoretical framework incorporating its basic functions as discussed in the text. Generate a set of testable hypotheses based on your research question and the theoretical framework.

Your report must contain the sections outlined in the following guide. APA formatting standards must be followed throughout. The paper does not have to be lengthy; perhaps 750 to 1500 words. The introduction, research question, and hypothesis statement sections should be short and succinct. Most of the word count in your report will be in the literature review and theoretical framework sections.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

Obesity has become a prevalent issue across the globe, significantly affecting individuals' health and lengthening healthcare costs (World Health Organization, 2022). As lifestyles have shifted to favor sedentary activities, many individuals find themselves unsure how to effectively manage their weight. The adoption of physical training is one method offered to combat weight-related problems, which, when done correctly, can lead to healthier outcomes. Nonetheless, there is an existing dilemma regarding the safest and most effective training methodologies for weight loss. This literature review aims to summarize findings on various training methods, their effectiveness in weight loss, and the potential risks associated with them, thus leading to the formulation of a problem statement and hypotheses for further research.

Problem Statement

Many individuals struggle to maintain a healthy weight due to poor lifestyle choices and lack of physical activity. These challenges raise the question of how various training programs can be optimized to ensure safe weight loss while minimizing the risk of injury. This literature review will explore the effectiveness of diverse exercise regimens on weight loss and highlight the importance of structured training methods that prevent personal injuries.

Research Questions

1. Can individuals engage in weight loss training without undue risk?

2. What is the most effective exercise regimen for achieving sustainable weight loss?

Hypothesis

The hypothesis for this review posits that various training methodologies can aid in weight loss, albeit with differing levels of risk and effectiveness based on individual's background and physical condition.

Literature Review

Training and Weight Loss

Engaging in physical training presents multiple avenues for weight loss, with various studies highlighting the effectiveness of distinct training modalities. Jogging and running serve as two common methods for weight management (Kaplan et al., 2014). Both are aerobic activities contributing to calorie expenditure but have unique impacts on individuals based on their fitness levels. According to studies, jogging tends to be more sustainable than running, leading to more significant weight loss over time (Brunt, 2016).

Additionally, safe training practices must be examined to prevent injury. According to Kindermann and Scharhag (2016), individuals often face risks related to inappropriate training methods, such as injuries from over-exertion or improper techniques. This underscores the necessity for guidance from fitness professionals, ensuring optimal exercises that maximize weight reduction while minimizing injury risk.

Classifying and Organizing Sources

Sources were categorized based on types of training and associated risks. Research articles by Kaplan et al. (2014) and Brunt (2016), focusing on aerobic activities, emphasize the relationship between different training modalities and weight loss. Meanwhile, Kindermann and Scharhag (2016) focus on injuries associated with improper training, providing contrasting perspectives that shape the discussion around safety in training. Other studies have explored the psychological aspects of training, including motivation and adherence to exercise programs, as vital components for successful weight loss (Mundbjerg et al., 2018).

Theoretical Framework

The theoretical framework supporting this literature review is grounded in behavior change theories, which suggest that understanding individual motivations and the structural environment translates into successful behavior modification leading to weight loss (Myers et al., 2017). Elements from the health belief model and social cognitive theory underscore how perceived barriers and self-efficacy levels influence one’s engagement with physical activity. So, the aim is to be holistic by recognizing the interconnectedness of psychological and situational factors that affect training and weight management.

Testable Hypotheses

1. Increasing levels of structured training will correlate with greater amounts of weight loss, while higher exposure to unstructured training will lead to increased injury risk.

2. Individuals with higher self-efficacy for exercise will be more successful in achieving their weight management goals.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a structured approach to training can significantly influence weight loss outcomes, while simultaneously reducing the risk of injuries. This literature review points towards various exercise modalities and their implications for weight management. Future research should focus on assessing the efficacy and safety of diverse training strategies, delivering more robust guidelines for individuals looking to maintain a healthy weight through physical activity.

References

  • Avila, P., & Hovell, M. F. (1994). Physical activity training for weight loss in Latinas: a controlled trial. International Journal of Obesity, 18(7), 480-486.

  • Brunt, E. M. (2016). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: pros and cons of histologic systems of evaluation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(1), 97.

  • Kaplan, Y., Barak, Y., Palmonovich, E., Nyska, M., & Witvrouw, E. (2014). Referent body weight values in over ground walking, over ground jogging, treadmill jogging, and elliptical exercise. Gait & Posture, 39(1), 162-168.

  • Kindermann, W., & Scharhag, J. (2016). High-level endurance exercise: are all potential 'cons' justified? Sports Medicine, 46(8), 1191-1204.

  • Mundbjerg, L. H., Stolberg, C. R., Cecere, S., Bladbjerg, E. M., Funch-Jensen, P., Gram, B., & Juhl, C. B. (2018). Supervised physical training improves weight loss after roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity, 26(5), 817-824.

  • Myers, A. M., Beam, N. W., & Fakhoury, J. D. (2017). Resistance training for children and adolescents. Translational Pediatrics, 6(3), 137-145.

  • Pickering, T. G. (1979). Jogging, marathon running, and the heart. The American Journal of Medicine, 66(5), 793-798.

  • World Health Organization. (2022). Obesity and overweight. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight