There Are Four Different Alternative Ways Of Answering Our Qu ✓ Solved
There are four different alternative ways of answering our questions in total: 1. Their gender: Female (1), Male (2), Gender Fluid (no numeral code because we did not receive any), Prefer Not To Say (3). 2. Their age: open-ended. 3. One interval scale: 0-1 (1), 2-3 (2), 4-5 (3), 6-7 (4). 4. Second interval scale: Never (1), Very Rarely (2), Rarely (3), Occasionally (4), Frequently (5), Very Frequently (6). Since last night, my team and I coded our 31 survey responses. Now we need to do the hard part, figure out which formulas to use and which variables. We have 56% Female, 42% Male, and 2% Prefer Not To Say. The majority of our ages are from 20s to mid 70s. However, now we have an additional 12 (43) responses. Should we go through and add these new responses to our codebook? My team is taking our response and converting them into numerical values. For those results where the answered 0-1, 2-3, 4-5, 6-7 we put a 1-4 value. Same with those that were never-very frequently, these went from 1-6. Once all of these have numerical values we can get the mean, median, and mode of scores between women and men or even between ages. We have a good clumping of ages with roughly half being within their mid to late 20s and the other half 50+. We can group those two together to see how stress and sleep affects them differently between alcohol usage, perceived anxiety, and restlessness.
Not entirely certain which statistical test to run though. Strategic IT Planning: Your 3-Step Process Introduction Strategic IT Planning is required to ensure your resources and assets continue providing the results and the support your organization needs. What is a Strategic Plan? It is a roadmap to achieving a goal. It may cover your entire department or responsibility or it may focus on a specific issue or element of your role. It can be long and involved or a simply one-page document that provides guidance and steps you need to implement to achieve a goal. Making it Happen There are a few things that are important to your success. While it may seem that developing the Strategic Plan is the hardest part, most plans fail because of the implementation. The key is to keep it small and be successful, then build on that success for the next initiative. Don’t bite off too much or try to be too ambitious.
Take your time and keep it manageable. Link your plan to your company’s strategy. Justify your initiative and get buy-in and support. Don’t re-invent, rebuild. Go slow, manage change. Set aside time from your operational responsibilities to make it happen. Without a Strategic Plan, you and your team won’t be effective and you won’t be able to get results, get attention, and get ahead. Why you need an IT Strategy: Redirect from tasks to opportunities and results. Switch from fighting fires to preventing fires. Reduce risk with planning and a longer view. Most Strategic Plans never get written or they fail because they are too involved and complex. Keep them simple and use these three basic steps as your core approach. Ask yourself these questions: 1. Why do you need to do it? What is your goal? 2. What are the things you need to get done to achieve your goal? 3. How can you make those things happen? By following the 3 steps above and writing them down, you will have the outline of your Strategic IT Plan.
Then, you establish the tactical things that will help you implement your plan. Implementation Plan Once you have established your strategic plan using the 3-step process, you need to develop your implementation plan. This includes getting approval and resources as well as the steps you need to take to achieve your strategic objective. 1. Set the objective for each step 2. Analyze internal/external factors 3. Develop solutions 4. Identify and eliminate barriers 5. Allocate resources (people, time, money) 6. Develop detailed tasks 7. Implement your plan! Step Implementation What Are The Roadblocks? How Can You Overcome The Roadblocks? What Resources Do You Need? What Are The Timelines? What Are The Main Steps To Implement Your Plan?
A total of 50 Facebook users (36 female, 12 male, 1 non-binary, and 1 preferred not to list their gender) volunteered to take the 12-question survey. Our research focuses on the stigmas surrounding emotional support animals. Participants were recruited through email, social media sites, or over the internet in general. Family members were emailed the survey, classmates were given the opportunity to fill out the survey (link was posted on a discussion open to all), and the link was posted on Reddit and Facebook. Our survey consisted of 11 questions total. The first two were demographic questions about gender and age. The next three asked if they owned a pet, an emotional support animal, and/or if they know someone who owns an emotional support animal. The remaining six questions were multiple choice. Each question involved a statement, and the participants had to decide if they strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with the statement.
Paper For Above Instructions
The process of analyzing survey data can reveal valuable insights into various demographic factors influencing subjective experiences. This paper discusses the data collected, the coding strategy used, and the statistical methods that may be applied to derive meaningful conclusions from the survey responses.
Survey Methodology
The survey targeted Facebook users, primarily focusing on stressful experiences related to alcohol usage, anxiety perceptions, and overall restlessness. It included 12 questions addressing demographic variables, behavior patterns, and subjective emotional experiences. Participants were carefully selected from various platforms, ensuring a mix inclusive of gender identities and varied backgrounds.
The demographic questions requested gender and age, seeking to categorize respondents as Female, Male, or Gender Fluid while recording age as an open-ended variable. The survey implemented two interval scales for quantifying responses concerning sleep patterns and anxious feelings. The aggregation method for responses categorized sleep duration and frequency of anxiety into numerical values on a defined scale, facilitating the computation of average scores and other relevant statistics.
Numerical coding for the survey responses involved converting qualitative insights into quantitative data. For instance, responses relating to sleep patterns were coded using the interval scales, where “Never” translated to 1 and “Very Frequently” to 6. For further clarity, survey results were also recorded regarding perceived anxiety and associated triggers. This approach allowed for statistical analysis primarily focusing on mean, median, and mode calculations within different demographic groups.
Analysis and Application of Statistical Tests
With the numerical values assigned to the responses, further analysis can be performed. The dataset reflects a significant ratio of respondents identifying as female (56%), male (42%), and a minority preferring not to disclose (2%). Given this gender balance, comparative analyses can be drawn between groups to explore any notable variations in stress and sleep correlations with variables such as alcohol use. Statistical tests, such as t-tests or ANOVA, can ascertain whether observed differences in means are statistically significant.
In examining age variables, responses can be grouped into two distinct categories: those in their 20s and those above 50. This delineation will help determine if age significantly influences reported experiences about alcohol consumption, levels of anxiety, and resultant restlessness. Statistical conclusions from t-tests or chi-square analyses may help identify associations and patterns across these age groupings.
Moreover, strategic IT planning can benefit from these analyses. Implementing insights from survey data can lead organizations to refine their strategic plans effectively. By linking survey insights with their operational strategies, organizations can improve their resource allocation, enhance productivity, and develop a clearer direction for addressing employee well-being during strategic IT initiatives.
Challenges in Data Interpretation
Despite the structured approach, challenges may still arise in interpreting the survey's findings accurately. Factors such as sampling bias, the limited demographic representation of participants, or discrepancies in self-reported data could skew the results. Ensuring a larger and more diverse sample may amplify the overall reliability of insights gathered from the survey data. Furthermore, identifying potential barriers during the data analysis process will facilitate a clearer framework for addressing roadblocks and fostering constructive discussions around emotional health and strategic planning.
Conclusion
In summary, analyzing survey responses can guide understanding stress patterns, emotional well-being, and strategic opportunities for organizations. By employing comprehensive statistical methodologies and refining our analysis approach, organizations can significantly enhance their strategies and reinforce structure and purpose in their IT planning processes. Continuous improvement in understanding these dynamics largely influences the efficacy of strategic initiatives fostering organizational growth and resilience.
References
- Price, P. C., & Jhangiani, R. S. (2018). Research methods in psychology [eBook edition]. Saylor Foundation.
- Field, A. P. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications.
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education.
- Burns, R. B. (2000). Introduction to research methods. SAGE Publications.
- Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2017). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. Cengage Learning.
- McClave, J. T., & Sincich, T. (2018). Statistics. Pearson Education.
- Dawson, B., & Trapp, R. G. (2004). Basic & clinical biostatistics. Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill.
- Mann, P. S. (2013). Introductory statistics. Cengage Learning.
- Coakes, S. J., & Steed, L. G. (2007). SPSS: Analysis without anguish. Wiley.
- Gilbert, N. (2008). Researching social life. SAGE Publications.