Website Bikel O Producer 2007 When Kids Get Life Frontli ✓ Solved

Website: Bikel, O. (Producer). (2007). When kids get life [Frontline Motion Picture]. Arlington, VA: Public Broadcasting Service: (Links to an external site.)

3. Articles: Carlyle, K. E., & Steinman, K. J. (2007). Demographic Differences in the prevalence, co-occurrence, and correlates of adolescent bullying at school. The Journal of School Health, 77 (9), 623-9. (ProQuest Document ID: ) Due, P., Merlo, J., Harel-Fisch, Y., Damsgaard, M. T., Holstein, B. E., Hetland, J., Currie, C., Gabhainn, S. N., Gaspar de Matos, M., & Lynch, J. (2009). Socioeconomic inequality in exposure to bullying during adolescence: A Comparative, Cross-Sectional, Multilevel Study in 35 Countries. American Journal of Public Health, 99 (5), 907-14. (ProQuest Document ID: ).

Paper For Above Instructions

Adolescent bullying is a pressing issue affecting students across environments, leading to negative physical and psychological outcomes. The documentary "When Kids Get Life" produced by O. Bikel (2007), captures the complex realities faced by youth entangled in serious criminal activities and sheds light on the impact of socio-environmental factors on adolescent behavior, including bullying. In concert with existing academic literature, this paper examines the prevalence of adolescent bullying, demographic differences in its occurrence, and the broader implications on mental health and educational outcomes.

Understanding Adolescent Bullying

Bullying among adolescents manifests in various forms, including physical, verbal, and relational aggression. According to Carlyle and Steinman (2007), demographic differences significantly influence bullying prevalence. Their extensive study highlighted that girls are often more prone to relational bullying, while boys exhibit higher tendencies towards physical bullying. Notably, the authors discussed how cultural norms and gender roles shape these behaviors, requiring educators and policymakers to develop gender-sensitive interventions.

Impact of Socioeconomic Inequality

The findings from Due et al. (2009) emphasize the importance of socioeconomic factors in understanding bullying exposure. This comparative, cross-sectional study, covering 35 countries, revealed that adolescents from lower socioeconomic backgrounds often experience higher rates of bullying. This disparity highlights the need for targeted strategies that address the root of the inequality, fostering a safer environment for at-risk youth. The interplay between economic status and bullying rates underscores that effective measures should consider the broader context in which adolescents operate.

Psychological Effects of Bullying

The psychological ramifications of bullying are profound, influencing an adolescent's self-esteem, academic performance, and mental health. Victims of bullying commonly report feelings of isolation, depression, and anxiety. The impact of such emotions can extend beyond school years, leading to long-term psychological distress. Moreover, a victim’s risk of engaging in delinquent behavior, as portrayed in "When Kids Get Life," suggests a cycle of violence perpetuated by unresolved trauma. This link necessitates a comprehensive approach to address the mental health needs of bullying victims through support systems within schools and communities.

Educational Implications

Education systems play a crucial role in combating bullying by fostering an inclusive environment. Anti-bullying programs that promote empathy, respect, and tolerance can significantly mitigate bullying instances. According to schools that adopt evidence-based programs, improvements in peer relationships and school climate are achievable, resulting in proactive rather than reactive measures. A strong school community can deter aggressive behaviors, thereby promoting the overall well-being of students.

Role of Parents and Guardians

Parental involvement stands central in addressing bullying. Parents must create open lines of communication with their children regarding school environments and social interactions. They should establish a foundation of trust, encouraging children to report incidents of bullying without fear of repercussions. Supportive dialogue empowers children and fosters resilience against potential bullying, as they will feel equipped to navigate challenges in peer relations.

Conclusion

The phenomenon of adolescent bullying is complex and multifaceted, influenced by demographic factors and socioeconomic status as illuminated in both the documentary "When Kids Get Life" and scholarly research. It is critical for stakeholders, including educators, parents, and policymakers, to collaborate toward creating a supportive atmosphere that prioritizes the mental health and safety of students. By addressing bullying holistically and inclusively, society can better equip adolescents with the tools needed to navigate their social landscapes amicably, ultimately leading to healthier futures.

References

  • Bikel, O. (Producer). (2007). When kids get life [Frontline Motion Picture]. Arlington, VA: Public Broadcasting Service.

  • Carlyle, K. E., & Steinman, K. J. (2007). Demographic Differences in the prevalence, co-occurrence, and correlates of adolescent bullying at school. The Journal of School Health, 77(9), 623-9.

  • Due, P., Merlo, J., Harel-Fisch, Y., Damsgaard, M. T., Holstein, B. E., Hetland, J., Currie, C., Gabhainn, S. N., Gaspar de Matos, M., & Lynch, J. (2009). Socioeconomic inequality in exposure to bullying during adolescence: A Comparative, Cross-Sectional, Multilevel Study in 35 Countries. American Journal of Public Health, 99(5), 907-14.

  • Holt, M. K., & Espelage, D. L. (2007). Bullying in North American schools. Routledge.

  • Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell Publishing.

  • Smith, P. K., & Sharp, S. (1994). School bullying: Insights and perspectives. Routledge.

  • Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and metaanalytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 1-29.

  • Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J., & Nansel, T. R. (2009). School bullying: Evidence from a four-country cross-national study. The Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 163(1), 21-27.

  • Espelage, D. L. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review of the literature on cyberbullying. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(3), S6-S10.

  • Rigby, K. (2002). New perspectives on bullying. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.