Week 8 Discussion: Contemplation and Consideration 1 Requ ✓ Solved

```html

Read/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapter 13, Lesson, Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook). Create a personal ethical philosophy and explain from which philosophy or philosophies (it must include at least one of the following: virtue ethics, Kantian ethics, utilitarianism, virtue ethics, or social contract ethics) you created it and why the contents are important and meaningful for you. List its precepts.

Take your personal ethical philosophy statement and use it to work through John Doe's case. What is moral and immoral per your theory? How would the veil of ignorance or a different theory of justice address John Doe's case?

Writing Requirements: APA format for in-text citations and list of references. Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside scholarly source).

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

Ethical philosophy serves as a foundational guide for personal conduct, decision-making, and understanding one’s duty towards society. In constructing a personal ethical philosophy, I draw from the tenets of utilitarianism, predominantly advocated by thinkers like Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. This philosophy emphasizes the greatest good for the greatest number, which resonates deeply with my values and beliefs. By weaving utilitarianism into my ethical framework, I prioritize outcomes that maximize overall happiness and minimize suffering.

Core Precepts of Utilitarianism

• The Principle of Utility: Actions are right if they promote happiness and wrong if they produce unhappiness.
• Impartial Consideration: Everyone’s happiness counts equally.
• Long-term Consequences: The focus is on the overall consequences of actions, not merely immediate outcomes.
• Practical Application: Ethical choices should be guided by evidential assessments of their impacts on well-being.

These precepts underlie my ethical philosophy and guide the way I approach moral dilemmas, including the case involving John Doe, a nurse who illegally downloads nursing course materials.

Analysis of John Doe's Case

In evaluating John Doe's actions through the lens of utilitarianism, we must assess the repercussions of his decisions on all stakeholders involved. John utilizes an application called "Cloak" to download educational materials, thus circumventing legal pathways. While John may justify his actions due to his economic constraints and the belief that others in a similar socioeconomic status also utilize this application, several moral dimensions arise.

According to a utilitarian framework, John’s action can initially seem justified; it provides him access to essential educational resources that could improve his quality of life and future opportunities. However, we must also consider the broader implications of his downloading behavior:

• Impact on Authors and Publishers: By downloading materials without purchasing them, John undermines the creators' rights and their ability to earn a living from their work. The potential loss of revenue for authors translates into less incentive to produce quality educational content, ultimately affecting the quality of education available.
• Precedent for Others: If John’s actions are viewed as acceptable, it might set a precedent for others to engage in similar behavior. This could lead to a wider culture of disregard for intellectual property rights, diminishing respect for authorship and potentially harming the educational resources available.
• Legal and Ethical Ramifications: Although John’s actions may appear minor compared to larger copyright infringements, they contribute to a societal trend where copyright laws become obsolete in the eyes of users. This could lead to stricter legal repercussions not just for individuals but for the educational institutions relying on these materials.

Evaluating the case through utilitarianism thus reveals a conflict between individual benefit and collective harm. The moral answer rests in understanding that the greatest happiness cannot be achieved by sacrificing the rights of creators for personal gain.

Veil of Ignorance and Justice Theories

The veil of ignorance, a concept introduced by philosopher John Rawls, posits that individuals should make decisions as if they do not know their own social status or individual circumstances. If John were to adopt this perspective, he would consider what rules he would find just instead of acting based on his current economic standing. Under this framework, it is likely that he would choose upholding copyright laws to protect the rights of all individuals, regardless of their personal situations.

Applying the veil of ignorance, one could argue that John should have acted in a manner that supports both his needs and those of authors and publishers. A just society should find ways to support individuals facing economic hardship while maintaining the integrity of intellectual property rights. This might involve exploring initiatives that provide access to educational materials through scholarships or low-cost resources, ensuring that all individuals can pursue education without resorting to unethical methods.

Conclusion

In conclusion, my personal ethical philosophy, grounded in utilitarianism, offers a clear lens through which to analyze John Doe's case. While his actions might stem from necessity, they provoke essential questions about the responsibilities we hold towards others in our pursuit of self-interest. The veil of ignorance offers a compelling argument for a more equitable approach to education, ensuring that moral actions uphold the rights of all. A comprehensive ethical framework considers the balance between individual needs and community welfare, ultimately fostering a society that values integrity and shared well-being.

References

• Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
• Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. T. Payne.
• Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
• Rachels, J., & Rachels, S. (2015). The Elements of Moral Philosophy. McGraw-Hill.
• Jenkins, H. (2018). Analyzing the Veil of Ignorance. Journal of Political Philosophy, 26(3), 237-250.
• Frankfurt, H. G. (1988). The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge University Press.
• Darwall, S. (2006). The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Harvard University Press.
• Peter, F. (2007). Practical Reason and Normative Psychology. Ethics, 118(4), 663-688.
• Stark, K. (2018). Ethics and Educational Technology: The Case for Fair Use. Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 101-114.
• Johnson, R., & Williams, K. (2020). Intellectual Property Rights: A Global Perspective. Routledge.

```