What Is An Organisation Labour Is A Pseudo Commodity The Capacit ✓ Solved

What is an organisation? Labour is a pseudo-commodity? The capacity to work cannot be separated from the worker as a human being, and ‘cannot be shoved about, used indiscriminately, or even left unused, without affecting also the human individual who happens to be the bearer of this peculiar commodity’; hence, the ‘commodity description of labor [...] is entirely fictitious’ (Karl Polany, The great Transformation).

Management of human ‘resources’ presents an ethical problem between rights and duties. The term ‘human resource management’ and its implications have been a subject of intense debate in business ethics. Humans are treated as important and costly resources, consequently subject to a strict managerial rationale of minimizing costs and maximizing the efficiency of the ‘resource’.

Central ethical issues in HRM revolve around employee rights, including the right to freedom from discrimination, the right to privacy, and the right to participation and association. Employees are entitled to healthy and safe working conditions, fair wages, and the right to freedom of conscience and speech. Conversely, employee duties attach obligations towards their employer such as compliance with labor contracts and an acceptable level of performance.

Diversity within organizations has gained attention for its potential to enhance decision-making and overall performance. Challenges include stereotypes, implicit biases, and managing diversity while addressing discrimination, which can be deep-rooted in institutional practices. Organizations respond through equal opportunity programs aimed at promoting procedural justice, while affirmative action seeks to improve representation among underrepresented groups.

As we address fairness in pay, it is crucial to understand the dynamics surrounding gender and employment. Historical data indicates that women have increasingly entered the workforce, shedding light on persistent pay gaps and challenges in career advancement.

To conclude, ethical considerations in human resource management intertwine with organisational practices and the treatment of all stakeholders, making it imperative for businesses to adopt a holistic approach to HRM that combines ethical values with their operational strategies.

Paper For Above Instructions

Understanding an organization requires delving into various aspects that define its structure, function, and the nature of its workforce. Organizations are complex entities that rely on individuals who possess labor—the capacity to work. This notion ties in closely with Karl Polanyi's assertion that labor acts as a pseudo-commodity; it cannot be treated like any other commodity without dehumanizing the individuals that form the backbone of an organization. As such, it's critical to examine the implications of treating labor merely as a resource in business contexts.

Organizations are comprised of various units that aim for a common goal. To flourish, they must leverage their human resources ethically and effectively. This concept is central to the field of Human Resource Management (HRM), which focuses on managing individuals as valuable resources. HRM must navigate the delicate balance between maximizing operational efficiency and respecting the inherent rights and dignity of workers. The ethical challenges arise when organizations prioritize profits over people, often leading to situations where the autonomy and well-being of the employee are compromised.

The phrase "human resource management" captures the essence of how organizations regard their workforce. It encapsulates a dire need for ethical management where employees are seen not just as tools for productivity but as stakeholders with rights. Employees have several rights, including the right to fair treatment, the right to healthy working conditions, and the right to be free from discrimination. These rights highlight the organization’s ethical responsibilities towards ensuring that employees are treated justly.

Moreover, employees have corresponding duties towards their employer. Compliance with labor contracts, adherence to workplace rules, and the expectation to perform effectively are fundamental duties. There exists a dual relationship where the rights of employees must be weighed against their responsibilities, prompting ongoing discussions on the ethical implications of this dynamic. For instance, if an employer implements policies that excessively prioritize cost-saving measures at the expense of employee welfare, it raises ethical concerns regarding the extent to which a company should go to enhance productivity.

Diversity management is another vital facet within HRM that transcends simple compliance with legal frameworks. Organizations are increasingly recognizing that diverse workforces can enhance performance by bringing varied perspectives, improving decision-making, and fostering innovation. However, diversity initiatives often face challenges, including implicit biases and institutional discrimination, which can undermine their intended outcomes. Research indicates that while diverse teams tend to outperform homogeneous ones, the actual implementation of diversity initiatives remains fraught with practical difficulties (Barak, 2013; Kirton & Greene, 2010).

In confronting potential biases, the concept of “implicit prejudice” becomes relevant. Studies show that implicit biases can shape behaviors and decisions subtly, impacting hiring practices, workplace dynamics, and even employee morale (Amodio & Devine, 2006; Dasgupta & Rivera, 2006). For organizations, this necessitates creating training sessions that promote awareness of biases and their repercussions, thereby facilitating a culture that values inclusivity.

Additionally, the question of equal opportunity versus diversity management emerges. While equal opportunity aims at creating a level playing field, managing diversity seeks to actively promote inclusion and leverage individual differences to improve business outcomes. The distinction lies in the strategic intent: organizations pursuing diversity manage cultural dynamics and operational policies to embrace differences as strengths rather than merely comply with legal obligations (Beauchamp, 1997).

One pressing issue that intersects with the discussions on rights and duties is the gender pay gap. Despite progress in female employment rates, a significant wage disparity persists between men and women across various sectors (van Wanrooy et al., 2013). Understanding the reasons behind these wage differences requires analyzing pay structures and the factors that influence salary negotiations. Transparency in pay systems and the commitment to equitable pay practices are imperatives that organizations must consider as ethical business practices.

Another core area necessitating ethical scrutiny is the treatment of employees during downsizing or terminations. The processes surrounding layoffs must be transparent and allow for employees to voice concerns and participate in decision-making when applicable. Acknowledging employee rights during these challenging transitions is essential for maintaining trust and morale within the organization (Crain & Heischmidt, 1995).

In conclusion, approaching human resource management from an ethical perspective encourages organizations to view employees as integral stakeholders. The implications of labor as a pseudo-commodity remind us that the capacity to work is not merely a transactional element but is intertwined with individual dignity and human rights. Organizations must navigate this complex landscape by balancing operational efficiency with ethical considerations while promoting diversity, inclusion, and fair treatment throughout their practices.

References

• Amodio, D. M., & Devine, P. G. (2006). Stereotyping and Evaluation: A Social Neuroscience Approach. In Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.
• Barak, M. E. M. (2013). Managing Diversity: Toward a Globally Inclusive Workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Beauchamp, T. L. (1997). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Crain, M., & Heischmidt, K. (1995). Inclusion and Diversity: The Importance of a Global Perspective. In The Business Ethics Quarterly.
• Dasgupta, P., & Rivera, L. (2006). From Fear to Fairness: Institutionalizing the Inclusive Workplace. In Diversity and Inclusion in Organizations.
• Kirton, G., & Greene, A.-M. (2010). Gender in Organizations: Core Concepts. London: Routledge.
• Legge, K. (1998). Human Resource Management: Rhetoric and Realities. London: Macmillan.
• Rooth, D.-O. (2007). Objective versus Subjective Discrimination in Hiring. In Journal of Labor Economics.
• van Wanrooy, B., et al. (2013). The Labour Market in the UK: Women and Employment. London: Office for National Statistics.
• Visser, J. (2006). Trade Unions in the 21st Century: An Overview. In Global Labour Organization.