Why Are You Cancelling Your Auto Policy ✓ Solved

```html

The data indicates that most people cancel their auto policy due to rates rather than the services offered. A significant number of members leaving had previously filed claims or had negative driving records. The Member Retention Team has tracked their statistics and believes that if USAA could match competitors’ rates, it would retain more members. Other solutions include educating members on insurance, conducting contract reviews, and outsourcing servicing calls.

Paper For Above Instructions

Understanding the reasons behind policy cancellations is crucial for insurance providers like USAA to improve retention rates and enhance member satisfaction. This paper examines the factors influencing members to cancel their auto policies and proposes viable solutions to retain them.

Introduction

The insurance industry is highly competitive, and customer retention is an essential aspect of maintaining profitability. Recent data collected from USAA's Member Retention Team indicates a concerning trend: members are primarily canceling their auto policies due to high rates rather than dissatisfaction with services. This paper aims to explore the reasons for these cancellations and suggest strategies to improve retention rates.

Reasons for Cancelling Auto Policies

From the collected data, the primary reason for policy cancellations among USAA members is associated with rising rates. Specifically, the statistics reveal that three times as many of the members leaving had either filed a claim or had an adverse driving record. These two factors significantly correlate with the perceived value members derive from their insurance policies. When rates increase, particularly for those who have previously made claims or possess negative driving records, it often leads to dissatisfaction and ultimately cancellation.

Survey Insights

In a survey conducted by the Member Retention Team, one significant finding was that most respondents did not compare contracts or consider alternatives before making the decision to leave. This indicates a lack of awareness or understanding of the policies they held, which could have been mitigated through better communication and education from USAA. Only one out of the surveyed members indicated they would remain with USAA if the rates were matched with competitors, underscoring the need for USAA to reassess its pricing strategy.

Proposed Solutions

Addressing the issues faced by USAA requires multifaceted strategies:

  • Rate Matching: If USAA can effectively match or offer competitive rates, it could significantly enhance retention rates. This not only prevents cancellations but can also attract new members.

  • Member Education: Providing members with a clearer understanding of their policies and the insurance process will empower them to make informed decisions. Workshops, webinars, and easy-to-understand pamphlets can bridge this knowledge gap.

  • Contract Reviews: Regularly reviewing contracts with members can facilitate transparency and ensure members are aware of their coverage options and rates.

  • Outsourcing Services: Outsourcing servicing calls to third-party providers may allow USAA to focus more on personalized services and improve member engagement.

  • Claims Review for Satisfaction Rates: Analyzing claims and corresponding satisfaction rates can reveal underlying issues within the claims process, enabling USAA to improve service delivery.

Conclusion

In conclusion, cancelling auto policies is predominantly driven by rate increases rather than dissatisfaction with services. USAA has the opportunity to enhance its member retention by adopting strategic measures that focus on competitive pricing, member education, and improved service delivery. By paying closer attention to the attributes that contribute to policy cancellations, USAA can significantly mitigate its member attrition rate and strengthen its competitive position in the insurance market.

References

  • Graham, C. (2018). USAA Rates [Telephone interview].

  • Bartel, C., Baldi, C., & Dukerich, J. M. (2016). Fostering stakeholder identification through expressed organizational identities. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity.

  • de Vries, H., Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2018). A stakeholder perspective on public sector innovation: why position matters. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2).

  • Reypens, C., Lievens, A., & Blazevic, V. (2019). Hybrid Orchestration in Multi-stakeholder Innovation Networks: Practices of mobilizing multiple, diverse stakeholders across organizational boundaries. Organization Studies.

  • Lehtinen, J., & Aaltonen, K. (2020). Organizing external stakeholder engagement in inter-organizational projects: Opening the black box. International Journal of Project Management, 38(2), 85-98.

```