Why would a company use the sum-of-the year or declining ✓ Solved

```html

1. Why would a company use the sum-of-the year or declining balance methods to calculate depreciation?

2. How many years does it take to depreciate a piece of equipment with a five year recovery period MACRS?

3. A piece of equipment purchased for $110,000 has an estimated salvage value of $10,000 at the end of the recovery period. Prepare a depreciation schedule for the piece of equipment using the straight-line method with a recovery period of seven years.

4. For the current tax year, 2021, what are the maximum Section 179 deductions and the amount where Section 179 begins to be phased out?

5. A piece of equipment is purchased for $40,000 and has an estimated salvage of $1,000 at the end of the recovery period. Prepare a depreciation schedule for the piece using the sum-of-the-years method with a recovery period of five years.

Paper For Above Instructions

Depreciation is a crucial aspect of financial accounting that affects how companies report their assets and manage their finances. There are several methods for calculating depreciation, including the sum-of-the-year digits (SYD) method and the declining balance method. Each of these methods has its rationale and preferred applications in different circumstances.

1. Use of Sum-of-the-Year and Declining Balance Methods

The sum-of-the-year digits method is an accelerated depreciation method. It allows businesses to recognize more of the asset's cost in the earlier years of its useful life. This can be advantageous for companies that wish to match their expenses with higher initial revenues that the asset may generate. Additionally, accelerating depreciation can provide tax advantages, as higher depreciation expenses in the early years lead to lower taxable income. Companies may employ this method when they expect the asset to generate higher benefits in its early years compared to later years.

The declining balance method is another accelerated depreciation method. This approach applies a fixed depreciation rate to the declining book value of the asset rather than its original cost. The essence of this method lies in its principle that many assets lose their value more quickly in the early stages of their life. Companies often prefer this approach for assets that may become obsolete quickly or have more utility at the beginning of their usage. Both methods allow for a more accurate representation of an asset's economic reality, encouraging companies to select depreciation methods that reflect their operational usage of the asset.

2. Depreciation Duration under MACRS

The Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) is the standard for depreciation in the U.S. tax code. It allows businesses to recover the cost of assets over a specified period, typically ranging from three to twenty years, depending on the asset type. For equipment with a five-year recovery period under MACRS, depreciation occurs over exactly five years. This structured timeline ensures that companies can systematically recover their investments in machinery and equipment while providing tax benefits correspondingly.

3. Depreciation Schedule using Straight-Line Method

For the equipment purchased at $110,000 with a $10,000 salvage value over seven years using the straight-line method, the annual depreciation expense can be calculated as follows:

Annual Depreciation = (Cost - Salvage Value) / Useful Life

Annual Depreciation = ($110,000 - $10,000) / 7 = $14,285.71 approximately.

The depreciation schedule would thus look like this:

4. Section 179 Deductions for 2021

For the tax year 2021, the maximum Section 179 deduction is capped at $1,050,000, with a phase-out threshold beginning once equipment acquisitions exceed $2,620,000. This regulation allows small to medium businesses to fully expense their capital investments in qualifying equipment rather than depreciating them over several years. The advantage here is substantial, as it encourages investment and growth in capital assets, allowing companies to claim significant tax benefits within that fiscal year rather than waiting until the object's cost is depreciated.

5. Depreciation Schedule using Sum-of-the-Years Method

For a piece of equipment costing $40,000 with a salvage value of $1,000, using the sum-of-the-years digits (SYD) method over a five-year recovery period entails the following calculations:

First, calculate the sum of the years: SYD = n(n + 1) / 2 = 5(5 + 1) / 2 = 15.

The depreciation calculations per year will subsequently be:

• Year 1: Depreciation = ($40,000 - $1,000) * (5/15) = $12,933.33
• Year 2: Depreciation = ($40,000 - $1,000) * (4/15) = $10,933.33
• Year 3: Depreciation = ($40,000 - $1,000) * (3/15) = $8,933.33
• Year 4: Depreciation = ($40,000 - $1,000) * (2/15) = $6,933.33
• Year 5: Depreciation = ($40,000 - $1,000) * (1/15) = $4,933.33

The corresponding book value at the end of each year would adjust according to these figures accordingly.

Conclusion

The appropriate choice of depreciation method allows companies to represent their financial performance accurately while optimizing their tax liabilities. Factors such as cash flow needs, asset utility, and compliance with financial reporting standards guide this decision. Despite their complexities, methods like the sum-of-the-years and declining balance can align financial strategies effectively, thus benefiting the companies over the long term.

References

• Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2017). Financial Management: Theory & Practice. Cengage Learning.
• Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2020). Accounting Principles. Wiley.
• Horngren, C. T., Harrison, W. T., & Oliver, S. M. (2018). Financial Accounting. Pearson.
• IASC. (2020). International Accounting Standards Board. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org
• IRS. (2021). Instructions for Schedule C (Form 1040). Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov
• Toulan, A. (2019). The Use of Accelerated Depreciation: Perspectives and Strategies. Journal of Finance, 74(3), 22-34.
• Kimmel, P. D., Weygandt, J. J., & Kieso, D. E. (2021). Managerial Accounting. Wiley.
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2019). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 93. Retrieved from https://www.fasb.org
• Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. (2015). Advanced Management Accounting. Pearson.
• Choi, F. D. S. (2020). International Accounting. Pearson.

```