2agenda Comparison Grid And Fact Sheet Or Talking Points Brief Assignm ✓ Solved
2 Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief Assignment Template for Part 1 and Part 2 Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid Use this Agenda Comparison Grid to document information about the population health/healthcare issue your selected and the presidential agendas. By completing this grid, you will develop a more in depth understanding of your selected issue and how you might position it politically based on the presidential agendas. You will use the information in the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid to complete the remaining Part 2 and Part 3 of your Assignment. Identify the Population Health concern you selected. Describe the Population Health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it.
Administration (President Name) President Trump President Obama President Bush Describe the administrative agenda focus related to this issue for the current and two previous presidents. Identify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue. Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, complete the following to document information about the population health/healthcare issue your selected Administration (President Name) President Trump President Obama President Bush Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?
How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda for the current and two previous presidents? How does it stay there? Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents? © 2021 Walden University Project Charter V 2.0 Project Charter Project Name Project Number Project Team Prioritization Owner(s) Start Date: Scheduled Completion Date: NOTE: Remove this note and all instructions in the template for a business professional document. Mission/ Purpose What is your project going to accomplish? How does this project relate to overall strategic goals and objectives of the company?
Is it part of a program or larger project? SOW: Project Description and Project Product What will this project create? What are the outcome products being created with this project? At a high level, how do you plan on completing the work required for this project? List at least five high-level deliverables (outputs) that will be generated from the execution of this project.
This section will help to prepare for your project scope and WBS later in the course. The SOW must contain an appropriate level of detail so all parties clearly understand what work is required, the duration of the work involved, what the deliverables are, and what is acceptable. This section should provide a general description of the project as well as highlight the project’s background and what is to be gained by the project. As the SOW often accompanies a request for proposal (RFP), the SOW introduction and background is necessary for bidding vendors to familiarize their organizations with the project. Objectives What objective is this project designed to meet?
List a high-level objective statement for the overall project and at least three to five goals required to meet this objective. These must be measurable. For example, if an objective of the project is the cut cost, then by how much will costs be cut? Business Need Why should we do this project? What will be gained, changed, or modified?
Is there a financial or business reason to do this project? Explain, in detail, how this project will be beneficial to the project owner. Milestones What are the key milestone dates associated with the project? Milestones may show the completion of a set of major deliverables or phases. List at least 10 milestones and provide estimated end dates for each.
Milestones must have associated dates. Budget What is the estimated budget for this project? Do not research your project cost; this is an estimate. This does not need to be close to your project’s actual costs when your project planning is complete in Week 6. This is an order of magnitude estimate.
Estimated Labor Estimated Materials Estimated Contractors Estimated Equipment and Facilities Estimated Travel Total Estimated Cost User Acceptance Criteria What are the minimum success criteria as defined by the key stakeholders? How will you monitor and measure the project quality? How will the project owners determine if the project is a success or not? These must be detailed and measureable. High-Level Project Assumptions What are the assumptions on which the project is based?
What 7–10 statements do you believe to be true or will become true about the project during project execution but cannot be sure at this time? High-Level Project Constraints What are the major limiting factors that affect the project? What 8–10 rules, regulations, requirements, laws, processes, or procedures are you bound by on this project? Exclusions and Boundaries What are the boundaries of the project? To ensure that your project scope is properly constrained, identify 8–10 things that will be excluded from the project plans.
What items will be not be included in the project? Major Risks What are the major risks affecting the project? List a minimum of 7 to 10 risks. These risks must occur during the project, not after the project finishes or before the project starts. The risks defined should be directly associated with the project implementation.
Work Breakdown Structure The PMBOK defines the WBS as “a deliverable-oriented hierarchical decomposition of the work to be executed by the project team to accomplish the project objectives and create the required deliverablesâ€. So your WBS should start by outlining those major deliverables you outlined in your SOW or in your scope document, if one has been developed. The lowest level of your WBS is called a work-package. Please review your textbook and the PMBOK on ways you can create your WBS. You should keep your WBS here at a very high-level.
Here is a simple example of a WBS. Project: Remodel Basement Room · 1.0 Project Management · 2.0 Structural Work · 2.1 Frame walls and door · 2.2 Install wallboard and tape/sand · 2.3 Install egress window · 3.0 Electrical Work · 3.1 Install additional circuit · 3.1.1 Upgrade electrical service · 3.1.2 Install separate circuit for computer and lighting · 3.2 Run wiring · 3.3 Install outlets and ceiling lights · 3.4.1 Install GFI outlets · 3.4.2 Install track lighting opposite window · 3.4.3 Test · 4.0 Paint Room · 5.0 Lay Carpet _____________________________________________________________________ KEY STAKEHOLDERS Project Core Team Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) (What resources will you need with special expertise?) APPROVALS Type Name Signature Date Project Manager Approval Customer/Sponsor Approval
Paper for above instructions
Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis: Addressing Opioid Addiction in the United States
Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid
Population Health Concern: Opioid Addiction in the United States
Description: The opioid crisis in the United States has emerged as a significant public health concern, leading to thousands of overdose deaths annually. Contributing factors include prescription practices, availability of illicit opioids like heroin and synthetic opioids (e.g., fentanyl), socio-economic aspects, and mental health issues. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA, 2023), in 2021 alone, over 80,000 opioid overdoses were reported, indicating a growing epidemic that needs attention from policymakers.
| Administration | President Trump | President Obama | President Bush |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Administrative Agenda Focus | Emphasized law enforcement and prevention initiatives. Special focus on treatment accessibility during last years of administration. | Comprehensive approach incorporating healthcare access, prevention initiatives, and education to combat opioid prescriptions. | Limited federal response; focused on treatment and law enforcement with less emphasis on prevention. |
| Financial Allocations | Proposed billion funding in 2018 for opioid-related programs including prevention and treatment. | Increased funding for addiction treatment programs through the Affordable Care Act (ACA), allocating approximately billion in 2016 for state grants. | Enacted the Drug Addiction Treatment Act (DATA) in 2000 but limited funding resources for addiction-related programs. |
| Approach to Issue | Focused on "tough on crime" strategies while also expanding funding for treatment. Proposed CARES Act in 2018 aimed at improving prevention and treatment. | Advocated for refocusing Medicare and Medicaid to enhance treatment coverage for substance use disorders. | Initiatives under the Office of National Drug Control Policy with limited success in reducing substance abuse rates. |
Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis
Responsible Administrative Agency:
For addressing opioid addiction, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) would most likely lead the efforts across all three administrations, focusing on improving treatment accessibility, funding prevention programs, and expanding mental health services (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2023).
Agenda Setting for the Presidents:
The opioid issue would gain federal attention through rising overdose death statistics, increased media coverage, and advocacy from health organizations and local communities. It stays relevant through continuous engagement from stakeholders, including healthcare providers, families affected by addiction, and community organizations advocating for policy change (Schuchat et al., 2017).
Entrepreneurs/Champions for the Issue:
- President Trump: Tom Price, former Secretary of Health and Human Services, who promoted the opioid response.
- President Obama: Michael Botticelli, Director of National Drug Control Policy, emphasized a comprehensive health-focused strategy.
- President Bush: John Walters, Director of National Drug Control Policy, who promoted a more traditional approach focused on drug enforcement.
Project Charter
Project Name: Comprehensive Opioid Addiction Mitigation
Project Number: COAM-1001
Project Team: Healthcare Professionals, Policy Advocates, Community Leaders
Owner(s): Opioid Task Force
Start Date: January 1, 2024
Scheduled Completion Date: December 31, 2024
Mission/Purpose:
The project aims to reduce opioid addiction rates by enhancing treatment accessibility, promoting prevention Education, and advocating for policy reforms. It aligns with the strategic goals of improving public health outcomes and addressing chronic substance use disorders.
SOW: Project Description and Product
The project will establish community-based resources, enhance treatment programs, and create awareness campaigns, aiming to create a sustainable framework to combat the opioid crisis.
Deliverables:
1. Development of community training programs for healthcare personnel.
2. Establishment of at least five new treatment centers within community locations.
3. Launch of a public awareness campaign on opioid addiction prevention.
4. Policy proposal for state and federal governments to improve healthcare access.
5. Quarterly evaluation reports on the effectiveness of new initiatives.
Objectives:
Overall Objective: Reduce opioid overdose deaths by 20% in the targeted communities over the next year.
Goals:
1. Increase the number of patients accessing treatment resources by 25%.
2. Enhance community training programs and certification by reaching at least 500 healthcare providers.
3. Develop partnerships with at least ten community organizations for awareness initiatives.
Business Need:
Addressing the opioid crisis is essential due to its widespread impact on public health and safety. The project aims to mitigate the financial burden on healthcare systems and improve community health outcomes. The business justification includes reduced healthcare costs, improved productivity, and enhanced public well-being.
Milestones:
1. Project Kick-off Meeting: January 10, 2024
2. Training Program Development Completion: March 31, 2024
3. Launch of Treatment Centers: June 30, 2024
4. Public Awareness Campaign Launch: April 1, 2024
5. Monthly Progress Report Submission: Every First Monday of the Month
6. Community Stakeholder Meetings: Last Friday of Each Month
7. Policy Proposal Draft Completion: November 15, 2024
8. External Evaluation of Success Metrics: November 30, 2024
9. Final Report Submission: December 15, 2024
10. Project Closure Meeting: December 31, 2024
Budget:
- Estimated Labor: 0,000
- Estimated Materials: ,000
- Estimated Contractors: ,000
- Estimated Equipment: ,000
- Estimated Travel: ,000
- Total Estimated Cost: 0,000
User Acceptance Criteria:
Success will be defined by a 20% reduction in overdose deaths in targeted regions. Quarterly evaluations will help assess the effectiveness of treatment programs, and stakeholder feedback will be solicited after each major milestone.
High-Level Project Assumptions:
1. Sufficient support from community stakeholders will be secured.
2. Funding from government grants will be accessible.
3. Community interest in training programs will remain high.
4. Opioid addiction will be prioritized in health agendas.
5. Healthcare systems will collaborate effectively.
6. There will be no major regulatory changes affecting project execution.
7. Public awareness levels will increase.
High-Level Project Constraints:
1. Regulation on opioid prescriptions.
2. Limited federal funding for substance abuse treatment.
3. Variability in community involvement.
4. Changing political priorities related to healthcare.
5. Existing stigmatization of opioid addiction.
6. Availability of trained healthcare providers.
7. Possible delays in policy changes.
Exclusions and Boundaries:
1. This project will not engage in illegal drug enforcement actions.
2. The project will not provide medical treatment directly.
3. Initiatives will exclude populations outside of targeted community areas.
4. Policy advocacy will not extend to more than state-level proposals.
5. This project will not involve funding for research into opioids.
6. Mental health programs outside addiction services are excluded.
7. Social intervention programs are not part of this initiative.
8. Initiatives will not extend beyond the project timeline.
9. No initiative will duplicate existing programs without assessment.
10. The project does not cover prescription regulation.
Major Risks:
1. Public resistance to treatment programs.
2. Changes in government policy regarding opioid funding.
3. Variability in overdose rates affecting project funding.
4. Difficulty in enlisting healthcare professionals to participate.
5. Inadequate community engagement and awareness.
6. Economic downturn affecting funding sources.
7. Regulatory setbacks prolonging program implementation.
8. Failure in collaboration with local organizations.
9. Stigma associated with opioid addiction deterring participation.
10. Risk of unanticipated increase in opioid drug abuse rates during program rollout.
Work Breakdown Structure
- 1.0 Project Management
- 2.0 Training Programs
- 2.1 Develop Training Curriculum
- 2.2 Partner with Educational Institutions
- 2.3 Schedule Training Sessions
- 3.0 Treatment Centers
- 3.1 Site Selection
- 3.2 Obtain Necessary Licensure
- 3.3 Staff Hiring and Training
- 4.0 Public Awareness Campaign
- 4.1 Media Engagement
- 4.2 Community Events
- 4.3 Public Relations Strategy
- 5.0 Policy Advocacy
- 5.1 Draft Proposals
- 5.2 Coordinate with Stakeholders
- 5.3 Monitor Legislative Movement
Key Stakeholders:
- Healthcare Policy Advocates
- Local Government Officials
- Community Health Organizations
Approvals
- Project Manager Approval
- Customer/Sponsor Approval
References
1. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2023). Opioid Overdose Crisis. Retrieved from [https://nida.nih.gov](https://nida.nih.gov)
2. Schuchat, A., Houry, D., & Giles, W. (2017). The opioid epidemic in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 107(2), 287-289.
3. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2023). National Helpline. Retrieved from [https://www.samhsa.gov](https://www.samhsa.gov)
4. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2023). Delivering affordable health care. Retrieved from [https://www.hhs.gov](https://www.hhs.gov)
5. President's Commission on Combatting Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis. (2017). Final Report. Retrieved from [https://www.whitehouse.gov](https://www.whitehouse.gov)
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Understanding the epidemic. Retrieved from [https://www.cdc.gov](https://www.cdc.gov)
7. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). (2023). Diversion Control Division. Retrieved from [https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov](https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov)
8. National Center for Health Statistics. (2019). Statistics on Drug Overdose Deaths. Retrieved from [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs)
9. Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). (2023). National Drug Control Strategy. Retrieved from [https://www.whitehouse.gov/ondcp](https://www.whitehouse.gov/ondcp)
10. Kolodny, A., Courtwright, D. T., & Hellman, M. (2015). The prescription opioid and heroin crisis: A public health approach to an epidemic of addiction. Annual Review of Public Health, 36(1), 559-574.
This written assignment provides an analysis of the opioid addiction issue, comparing approaches by three U.S. Presidents, evaluating the situation and its political implications, and proposing a structured project to address both treatment and prevention efforts.