2group Processes And Stages Of Formationhuniversitynrnp 6650 Psychoth ✓ Solved

2 Group Processes and Stages of Formation H University NRNP-6650: Psychotherapy with Groups and Family Instructor: January 11, 2021. Group Processes and Stage of Formation. The purpose of group formation involves the group members to work together to achieve a common goal. The group adheres to common structures that enable them to realize the goals (Sperry, 2016). This paper aims to explain the group processes and stages of formation and explain the group's curative factors, including how they might impact the client's progress, explain the intragroup conflict that occurs, and recommend strategies for managing it.

Stages of Group Formation In formation stage, each member's role is unpredictable at this phase. The group members have to be courteous and respectful of one another, especially in their first meeting. According to Forsyth (2014), the members are anxious and show concerns about the event and its outcomes. In s torming stage, the members endeavor to accommodate one another due to their differences in their concepts, perceptions, uniqueness, temperaments, and significance, plus the groups require members to exhibit respect and courteous to one another. Members may be defiant and show skepticism and may challenge the authority or approach of the therapist.

In this phase, the courageous and more influential group members dominate and resist or question the group task (Yalom and Leszcz, 2005). In norming stage, the group has advanced and developed value for its members resulting in the harmonization of the group, open active communication, respect, and a sense of belonging for the members. At this phase, members can achieve conflict resolution. The group members establish tighter bonds and more substantial commitments to the goal of the team. In performing stage, the group members have acclimatized and accustomed to realizing the group's goal and objectives, subsequently leading to a positive aftereffect without friction.

The structure and processes the therapist set at the beginning of the team reinforce this phase, and it is hard to disrupt either by new members joining the group or old members leaving the group (Cautin & Lilienfeld, 2015). In adjourning phase, this is the final phase. Team members who like routine, or who have developed close working relationships with colleagues, may find this stage difficult, mainly if their future looks uncertain. There is the actualization of the group's goals and objectives, and an end to the group project. Curative Factors From the group interactions, five curative/beneficial factors are distinguishable.

First, purification/cleansing as the conflicting members liberate the poignant tension in the appropriate safe environment cut out/designed for the purpose by expressing/verbalizing their emotions. Secondly: The conflicting team members learn about existential factors to enable them to pick up responsibilities and answerable for their actions by evaluating their effects and consequences regardless of whether they have negative or positive outcomes. Thirdly, the team members establish attachment and togetherness as they divide into two conflicting groups, with one group associating with Pam and the other group affiliating with Philip. Fourthly: the team learns to interact with each other by developing an interpersonal relationship through socialization.

They learn to verbalize feelings, concerns, and observations and accommodate each other (Pitta, 2014). Intragroup Conflict and Management Strategies The initial conflict was between two members (Pam and Philips) that eventually extends to the rest of the group and can dissolve the group if the dispute is not solved amicably (Psychotherapy.net, 2011). The therapist will use an approach structured to promote togetherness, respect, and tolerance among the team to move from the storming to norming stage. The therapist serving as a mediator, encourage the team to verbalize reasons for conflicts and concerns. Each dispute is addressed/tackled separately with separate team members to reach harmonious verdicts respectable to the group members.

According to Wheeler (2014), conflict resolutions allow the team members to manage their emotions and resolve their differences. Conclusion Group therapy is a vital tool the therapist utilizes to resolve conflicts in a group, thereby controlling disorderliness. The social interaction among the group members is a significant key component in enhancing communications and developing trust. The group members go through various stages from phase one, which is unpredictable, to the final phase where the group relationship has strengthened, leading to the actualization of group goals with effective positive outcomes. References Cautin, R. & Lilienfeld, S. (2015).

The encyclopedia of clinical psychology, volume II Cli-E. Forsyth, D. R. (2014). Group dynamics (6th ed.). Retrieved from Psychotherapy.net (Producer). (2011a).

Group therapy: a live demonstration. [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Author. Sperry, L. (2016). Handbook of diagnosis and treatment of DSM-5 personality disorders: assessment, case conceptualization, and treatment (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2014). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: a how-to-guide for evidence-based practice. Wk 7 Group Psychotherapy The Assignment: Group Processes and Stages of Formation In a 3 page paper, address the following: · Explain the group’s processes and stage of formation. · Explain curative factors that occurred in the group. Include how these factors might impact client progress. · Explain intragroup conflict that occurred and recommend strategies for managing the conflict. Support your recommendations with evidence-based literature.

At least 3 references , 3 citations. Readings Required Readings American Nurses Association. (2014). Psychiatric-mental health nursing: Scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author. · Standard 5G “Therapeutic Relationship and Counseling†(page 62) Crane-Okada, R. (2012). The concept of presence in group psychotherapy: An operational definition.

Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 48 (3), . doi:10.1111/j..2011.00320.x Lerner, M. D., McLeod, B. D., & Mikami, A. Y. (2013). Preliminary evaluation of an observational measure of group cohesion for group psychotherapy.

Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69 (3), . doi:10.1002/jclp.21933 Nicholson, R. (2002). The dilemma of psychotherapy notes and HIPAA. Journal of AHIMA, 73(2), 38–39. Retrieved from U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (n.d.).

HIPAA privacy rule and sharing information related to mental health. Retrieved March 18, 2017, from Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.

Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books. Chapter 5, “The Therapist: Basic Tasks†(pp.

117–140) Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books. Chapter 8, “The Selection of Clients†(pp.

231–258) Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books. Chapter 9, “The Composition of Therapy Groups†(pp.

259–280) Required Media Psychotherapy.net (Producer). (2011a). Group therapy: A live demonstration. [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Author. The approximate length of the video is 202 minutes. In preparation for this week’s Assignment, be sure to watch Parts 1 and 2 of this video.

Paper for above instructions

Group Processes and Stages of Formation

Introduction
Group therapy serves as a dynamic platform through which individuals engage in collective experiences under the guidance of a therapist, ultimately working towards personal and shared goals (Sperry, 2016). This paper investigates the processes involved in group formation, outlines the stages that groups undergo, discusses curative factors, delves into the nature of intragroup conflict, and recommends strategies for effective conflict management. The integration of established theoretical frameworks and evidence-based findings will enhance the understanding of these complex dynamics.

Stages of Group Formation

Understanding the stages of group formation is essential for therapists and members alike as they navigate through the complexities of group dynamics. Tuckman’s model is particularly influential, comprising five stages: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning.
1. Forming: At this initial stage, members are typically polite but apprehensive. They are getting acquainted, establishing ground rules, and assessing the group’s goals (Forsyth, 2014). This careful interaction fosters a climate of safety, encouraging members to explore their feelings and concerns.
2. Storming: As members become more comfortable, conflicts might arise. Differences in opinions, perceptions, and personalities often surface, leading to tension. According to Yalom and Leszcz (2005), this stage is essential as it tests the group’s cohesion. Strong personalities may dominate discussions, causing resistance among quieter members (Wheeler, 2014). An effective therapist must identify and encourage open discussions about these conflicts to facilitate a move towards resolution.
3. Norming: In this phase, the group begins to develop a sense of unity and shared purpose. Members learn to express their thoughts and emotions more freely, fostering trust and open communication. Agreement on norms and group responsibilities strengthens bonds and cultivates a supportive environment, which ultimately enhances interaction (Yalom & Leszcz, 2005).
4. Performing: Here, the group evolves into a cohesive unit capable of collaborative work. Members have overcome earlier conflicts, leading to increased creativity and problem-solving effectiveness. The group's structure, defined in the initial stages, empowers members to focus on collective goals without disruption (Cautin & Lilienfeld, 2015).
5. Adjourning: This final phase involves the disbanding of the group, marked by reflection and closure. Members may feel anxiety regarding the ending of relationships built over time; however, a skilled facilitator can guide members to celebrate achievements and facilitate transitions to future endeavors (Forsyth, 2014).

Curative Factors

The therapeutic power of group therapy stems from certain curative factors that benefit members, promoting individual and collective growth.
1. Cohesion: A sense of belonging fosters trust and encourages members to take risks in sharing personal experiences (Forsyth, 2014). This cohesion allows individuals to feel safe and supported, enhancing overall engagement and progress.
2. Interpersonal Relationships: Groups serve as a microcosm of society, where members practice communicating and resolving conflicts (Pitta, 2014). This active interaction enables individuals to improve their social skills, leading to an enhancement in their relationships outside of therapy.
3. Existential Factors: Group interactions provoke self-reflection and raise awareness of personal responsibilities. Members recognize their decisions' effects on themselves and others, fostering a sense of accountability for their actions (Yalom & Leszcz, 2005).
4. Catharsis: Sharing emotions and experiences with others can be liberating. Venting feelings within the group may alleviate psychological distress, further accelerating healing and progress (Yalom & Leszcz, 2005).
5. Learning from Others: Observing others in the group and their reactions can provide insightful learning opportunities, guiding members in understanding coping mechanisms for their challenges.
These curative factors significantly impact client progress, as they contribute to greater self-awareness, facilitate emotional expression, and improve interpersonal skills.

Intragroup Conflict

Conflicts are inevitable in group therapy, arising from differing perspectives, goals, and temperaments among members. For instance, a scenario could involve two members, Pam and Philip, whose disagreements disrupt the group dynamic, highlighting the urgent need for conflict resolution.
Strategies for Managing Conflict
1. Facilitation of Open Dialogue: The therapist must encourage members to voice their conflicts, promoting a culture of openness and understanding. This process enables members to articulate their feelings without fear (Wheeler, 2014). Therapist-led discussions about divergent views help unravel underlying issues, paving the way for resolution.
2. Active Listening: Encouraging active listening among members fosters empathy and understanding. Members should learn to listen to differing viewpoints without forming immediate judgments (Forsyth, 2014).
3. Role-Playing: Engaging in role-playing exercises can help members explore conflicts from different perspectives. Yalom and Leszcz (2005) suggest that this approach enhances emotional insight and fosters conflict resolution.
4. Setting Clear Objectives: Establishing clear and shared group objectives can minimize miscommunication and align members toward a common purpose. This alignment can also diminish personal conflicts, refocusing energy on collective goals (Cautin & Lilienfeld, 2015).
5. Mediation by the Therapist: The therapist should play the role of a mediator to ensure fairness in discussions and encourage collaborative problem-solving. This approach can help de-escalate tensions and foster mutual respect among members (Sperry, 2016).

Conclusion

Group therapy is a multifaceted therapeutic approach involving distinct processes and stages of formation that collectively contribute to healing and growth. By understanding these stages, as well as leveraging curative factors, therapists can facilitate positive outcomes for group members. Moreover, conflicts are natural yet manageable, and employing strategies that promote dialogue, empathy, shared objectives, and therapist mediation can transform conflicts into opportunities for growth. Ultimately, the group dynamic, enhanced through careful navigation by the therapist, is fundamental to achieving therapeutic goals and facilitating meaningful client progress.

References

1. Cautin, R. & Lilienfeld, S. (2015). The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology, Volume II. Wiley.
2. Forsyth, D. R. (2014). Group Dynamics (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
3. Pitta, R. (2014). Healing in Group Therapy: Experiencing Group Processes and Relationships. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice.
4. Sperry, L. (2016). Handbook of Diagnosis and Treatment of DSM-5 Personality Disorders: Assessment, Case Conceptualization, and Treatment (3rd ed.). Routledge.
5. Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2014). Psychotherapy for the Advanced Practice Psychiatric Nurse: A How-To-Guide for Evidence-Based Practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
6. Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy (5th ed.). Basic Books.
(Additional references can be included as required or specified.)