71619 835 Pmpresentation To Management Scoring Guidepage 1 Of 2htt ✓ Solved

7/16/19, 8)35 PMPresentation to Management Scoring Guide Presentation to Management Scoring Guide CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Summarize the identified problem(s) in a selected scenario. Does not list the identified problem(s) in a selected scenario. Lists but does not summarize the identified problem(s) in a selected scenario. Summarizes the identified problem(s) in a selected scenario. Summarizes the identified problem(s) in a selected scenario; connects the problems to specific research studies.

Summarize psychology research findings that have been applied to solve a specific problem or to make a specific improvement. Does not list psychology research findings that have been applied to solve a specific problem or to make a specific improvement. Lists but does not summarize psychology research findings that have been applied to solve a specific problem or to make a specific improvement. Summarizes psychology research findings that have been applied to solve a specific problem or to make a specific improvement. Summarizes psychology research findings that have been applied to solve a specific problem or to make a specific improvement, using research that is current and directly applicable to the problem.

Describe the research methods outlined in scholarly research articles. Does not list the research methods outlined in scholarly research articles. Lists but does not describe the research methods outlined in scholarly research articles. Describes the research methods outlined in scholarly research articles. Describes the research methods outlined in scholarly research articles and analyzes the research design.

Apply findings from scholarly research to develop proposed solution(s) to the problem(s). Does not develop proposed solution(s) to the problem(s). Develops proposed solution(s) to the problem(s), but the connection to research findings is either inadequate or unclear. Applies findings from scholarly research to develop proposed solution(s) to the problem(s). Applies findings from scholarly research to develop proposed solution(s) to the problem(s).

Provides examples of how the findings form the basis of the solution(s). Demonstrate how a proposed solution is based in theory. Does not discuss a solution. Discusses a solution, but is not clear how it is based in theory. Demonstrates how a proposed solution is based in theory.

Demonstrates how a proposed solution is based in theory. Provides multiple examples based in research. Speculate how a proposed solution, based on theory and research, could impact mental health and well-being through behavior changes. Does not speculate how a proposed solution could impact mental health and well- being through behavior changes. Speculates how a proposed solution could impact mental health and well-being through behavior changes, but does not connect it to theory or research.

Speculates how a proposed solution, based on theory and research, could impact mental health and well- being through behavior changes. Speculates how a proposed solution, based on theory and research, could impact mental health and well-being through behavior changes; provides multiple examples of behavior change. Develop speaker's notes to explain every slide, with references from scholarly sources to support positions. Does not develop speaker's notes to explain every slide, with references from scholarly sources to support positions. Develops incomplete speaker's notes to explain the slides and does not cite references from scholarly sources to support positions.

Develops speaker's notes to explain every slide, with references from scholarly sources to support positions. Develops robust speaker's notes to explain every slide, with references from scholarly sources to support positions. Write coherently to Does not write Writes in support of Writes coherently to Writes coherently, using 7/16/19, 8)35 PMPresentation to Management Scoring Guide support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics, as expected of a psychology professional. coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics, as expected of a psychology professional. an idea but inconsistently or lacking organization, and commits numerous errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics, as expected of a psychology professional. scholarly evidence to support a central idea, with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics, as expected of a psychology professional.

Use current APA format and style. Does not use current APA format and style. Uses current APA style and format, but with multiple types of errors and inconsistencies. Uses current APA format and style. Applies scholarly writing skills and uses current APA style and format in the body of the paper and references list.

Paper for above instructions

Presentation to Management: Addressing Employee Burnout

Introduction

In an increasingly dynamic work environment, employee burnout has emerged as a significant issue that not only threatens the mental well-being of workers but also undermines organizational efficiency and productivity (Maslach et al., 2018). This presentation seeks to succinctly summarize the identified problem of employee burnout, summarize relevant psychology research that addresses the issue, describe the research methods used in these studies, propose solutions based on these findings, and speculate on the potential impact of these solutions on mental health and well-being.

Summarizing the Identified Problems

The issue of employee burnout is characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment (Maslach & Leiter, 2016). Employees often experience chronic stress due to excessive workloads, lack of support, and unclear job expectations, all of which contribute to feelings of inadequacy and frustration (Schaufeli et al., 2019). In a recent survey conducted by Gallup (2021), it was found that about 76% of employees experience varying degrees of burnout, impacting their job performance and overall satisfaction.
These statistics indicate a pressing need to address the causes of burnout, which includes a lack of work-life balance, ineffective communication, and inadequate management practices (Siegrist, 2021). Addressing these underlying factors is essential to foster a supportive work environment and enhance employee well-being.

Psychology Research Findings

Recent research findings in psychology have highlighted effective methods for managing and mitigating employee burnout. One pivotal study by Maslach and Leiter (2016) emphasized the importance of job crafting—a process whereby employees adjust their roles and responsibilities to better align with their strengths and interests. By engaging in job crafting, employees can find renewed purpose and satisfaction in their roles, thereby decreasing feelings of burnout.
Furthermore, research conducted by Schaufeli et al. (2019) indicated that fostering social connections among employees—such as peer support groups—can significantly reduce burnout. Social support has been shown to buffer the stressors at work, leading to higher employee engagement and job satisfaction.
Notably, a meta-analysis by Breevaart et al. (2016) revealed the significance of transformational leadership in alleviating burnout. Under transformational leaders, employees reported higher motivation levels and emotional well-being, contributing to a healthier work environment.

Research Methods in Scholarly Articles

The studies referenced employed a variety of research methods to elucidate the problem of burnout and its potential solutions. Maslach and Leiter (2016) utilized qualitative interviews to gather in-depth insights into employees' experiences with burnout within various organizations. This qualitative data allowed for a nuanced understanding of the factors contributing to burnout.
In contrast, Schaufeli et al. (2019) employed a quantitative approach, conducting surveys that measured levels of burnout across different sectors. These surveys utilized validated scales to assess emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, thus providing robust statistical analyses of burnout prevalence.
Breevaart et al. (2016) executed a meta-analysis, systematically reviewing existing literature on the effects of leadership styles on burnout. By synthesizing data from multiple studies, they provided comprehensive insights into the relationship between leadership and employee well-being.

Proposed Solutions Based on Research

Based on the research findings, several solutions can be developed to combat employee burnout. Implementing job crafting initiatives in organizations could lead to greater employee agency, allowing them to redefine their roles to align with personal interests and strengths (Wrzesniewski & Dutton, 2001). Organizations can facilitate this process by providing training and resources for employees to better understand their skills and how they can apply them at work.
Additionally, fostering peer support systems should be prioritized. This could include the establishment of mentorship programs where employees can connect with others within the organization for mutual support and guidance, cultivating a sense of community and shared purpose.
Finally, organizations should invest in transformational leadership development programs. Training leaders to adopt supportive leadership behaviors fosters an environment where employees feel valued and motivated, reducing burnout levels while promoting overall employee well-being (Goleman, 2017).

Speculation on the Impact of Proposed Solutions

Implementing these proposed solutions could lead to significant transformations in employees' mental health and well-being. Job crafting has the potential to promote a sense of ownership over roles, which could mitigate feelings of inadequacy and emotional exhaustion, as employees engage more fully with their work (Bakker et al., 2016).
By enhancing peer support networks, employees can feel more connected, decreasing isolation and its associated mental health risks (Cohen & Wills, 1985). Increased social support has been shown to improve resilience and coping mechanisms, which are critical in combating burnout.
Lastly, transformational leadership can inspire positive behavioral changes, encouraging employees to pursue professional development opportunities and fostering an atmosphere of collaboration. Such environments enhance work satisfaction and retention rates (Arnold et al., 2007).

Conclusion

Employee burnout is a critical issue in contemporary work environments with serious repercussions for both employees and organizations. By leveraging current psychological research on job crafting, social support, and transformational leadership, organizations can implement effective solutions that promote employee well-being. The proposed strategies offer the potential to significantly reduce burnout and enhance mental health, leading to a more engaged and productive workforce.

References

1. Arnold, K. A., Turner, N., Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K., & McKee, M. C. (2007). Transformational leadership and health in the workplace: The role of psychological capital. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(2), 183-199.
2. Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2016). The impact of e-mail communication on professionals' burnout: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(2), 239.
3. Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., & Hetland, J. (2016). The impact of transformational leadership on followers' engagement: A multilevel study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(5), 685-699.
4. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310.
5. Gallup. (2021). State of the Global Workplace: 2021 Report. Gallup Press.
6. Goleman, D. (2017). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review Press.
7. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Burnout: A guide to identifying burnout and pathways to recovery. Harvard Business Review Press.
8. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2018). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397-422.
9. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2019). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 61(1), 15-27.
10. Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201.