Annotated Bibliography Animal Welfare 2 ✓ Solved

ANIMAL WELFARE 2 Annotated Bibliography. This entry provides a collection of references discussing the themes and issues related to animal welfare in various contexts, including veterinary ethics, consumer perceptions, and the impact of reproductive technologies on animal welfare.

Annotated Bibliography Entries

Abraham, M. C., de Verdier, K., Bà¥ge, R., & Morrell, J. M. (2017). Semen collection methods in alpacas. Veterinary Record, 613–614. 10.1136/vr.104074 This paper focuses on reviewing the available methods that are currently used in obtaining spermatozoa or semen among southern American camelids. The paper also presents the challenges faced when handling the viscous seminal plasma of camelids. Reproductive biotechnologies such as embryo transfer and artificial insemination with cryopreserved embryos present unique complications among this species compared to challenges faced regarding domestic livestock (Abraham et al., 2017). The paper also discusses future developments and possibilities regarding applicable reproductive biotechnologies.

Alonso, M. E., Gonzà¡lez-Montaà±a, J. R., & Lomillos, J. M. (2020). Consumers’ Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare. Animals, 10 (3), 385. 10.3390/ani This paper explores the evolution of concerns and perceptions among consumers regarding the effects of intensified production systems and their impacts on animal welfare. Alonso et al. (2020) point to an increasing perception among consumers that farm animal welfare should be improved and protected. Consumers are attracted to quality attributes regarding animal welfare that signify authentic, healthier, environmentally friendly, and more hygienic products. Farmers and businessmen should be informed of this changing perception to adopt more sustainable and socially responsible practices essential for obtaining social ethical approval and maintaining public credibility.

Grumett, D. (2019). Aristotle’s Ethics and Farm Animal Welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 32 (2), 321–333. 10.1007/s This paper looks at the ethics of Aristotle and its contribution to the ethics of farm animals. In theorizing his concepts, Aristotle emphasized that a good and flourishing life is a factor of good diet, behavior, and physiology (Grumett, 2019). Aristotle believed that animals have a purpose in the ecosystem just as humans do and that their telos is unchanging and natural. Animals deserve to be treated with care due to their significant contributions in different communities worldwide. This paper provides a framework for farm animal ethics derived from the principles upheld by Aristotle.

Hernandez, E., Fawcett, A., Brouwer, E., Rau, J., & Turner, P. (2018). Speaking Up: Veterinary Ethical Responsibilities and Animal Welfare Issues in Everyday Practice. Animals, 8 (1), 15. 10.3390/ani The expectations regarding animal care are increasing in most developed countries. However, significant challenges regarding animal welfare continue to be experienced in the field of veterinary practice. According to Hernandez et al. (2018), veterinary ethics is still a new concept that requires educational focus due to its crucial importance in helping professionals formulate their approach to clinical case management and establish the overall acceptable practices towards animals. The paper presents insights on how veterinary ethics are taught, the approaches, and ethical frameworks employed in different cases. Hernandez et al. (2018) argue that a lack of veterinary ethical sensitivity or insufficient mature ethical reasoning often results in a failure of the duty to care for animals, consequently leading to poor animal welfare outcomes.

Ritter, C., Beaver, A., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. (2019). The complex relationship between welfare and reproduction in cattle. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 54, 29–37. 10.1111/rda.13464 Using reproduction to assess animal welfare presents certain limitations. Examining farm measures such as fertility rates signifies biological performance; however, this measure may fail to consider the welfare of individual animals. Ritter et al. (2019) argue that reproductive performance does not directly signify good welfare given the reproductive technologies currently employed on many farms. Although technologies such as artificial insemination are associated with several welfare advantages like reducing disease transmission and selecting specific beneficial properties, these practices may limit oestrus expression, potentially leading to negative attitudes among consumers who view naturalness as a critical aspect of animal welfare.

Conclusion

The exploration of animal welfare encompasses various aspects including reproductive ethics, veterinary responsibilities, and consumer perceptions. The literature highlights the importance of ethical considerations and the need for more sustainable practices in farming, which align with shifting consumer expectations.

References

  • Abraham, M. C., de Verdier, K., Bà¥ge, R., & Morrell, J. M. (2017). Semen collection methods in alpacas. Veterinary Record, 613–614. 10.1136/vr.104074

  • Alonso, M. E., Gonzà¡lez-Montaà±a, J. R., & Lomillos, J. M. (2020). Consumers’ Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare. Animals, 10(3), 385. 10.3390/ani

  • Grumett, D. (2019). Aristotle’s Ethics and Farm Animal Welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 32(2), 321–333. 10.1007/s

  • Hernandez, E., Fawcett, A., Brouwer, E., Rau, J., & Turner, P. (2018). Speaking Up: Veterinary Ethical Responsibilities and Animal Welfare Issues in Everyday Practice. Animals, 8(1), 15. 10.3390/ani

  • Ritter, C., Beaver, A., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. (2019). The complex relationship between welfare and reproduction in cattle. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 54, 29–37. 10.1111/rda.13464