Assignment Briefunit With Single Assignmentname Of Centrecoventry UAssignment Brief (Unit with single assignment) Name of Centre: Coventry University College Le

Assignment Briefunit With Single Assignmentname Of Centrecoventry U ✓ Solved

Assignment Brief (Unit with single assignment) Name of Centre: Coventry University College Learner achievement (please circle) NB: All learner achievement is provisional until confirmed at the AVA Awards Board Level Achieved: L2 L3 Final Grade Achieved (Level 3 units only) P M D Resubmission? Y N Title of Access to HE Diploma: Business Studies (e.g. Science) Unit title(s): Tort of Negligence Unit code(s): EC7/3/LN/021 Learner: Tutor/Assessor: Dr Paul Cook Description of Assignment: Task 1: Participate in a Group Discussion using one or two law cases per group and discuss the three main elements required in the Tort of Negligence From the discussion, write an essay of a 1000 words, analysing the three elements required in the Tort of Negligence using a range of law cases to demonstrate your understanding.

With reference to the assessment criteria, you should prepare your discussion and essay to address the following general questions: · Definition of the Tort of Negligence · Definition and analysis of the 3 elements of theTort of Negligence · What are the requirements that must be met to establish the Duty of Care, Breach of Duty and Causation/Damage? · Discuss at least one case to illustrate your explanation. (You might need more in your essay) Task 2: Prepare a Power Point Presentation Slides (you will not be asked to present this) which analyses and evaluates the defences available in the Tort of Negligence. Use law cases to demonstrate your application of knowledge. For this task you should look at the following: · Definition and explanation of various defences.

Look in particular at Contributory Negligence, Volenti Non Fit Injuria and Ex Turpi Causa. You can use additional defences too. · Look at and evaluate the main elements/characteristics of the above defences · Look at the law cases which have been solved using these defences. Task 3: Taking the case of Launchburys vs Morgans 1972, explain and evaluate the importance of Vicarious Liability and explain how loss can be established by the claimant in this case. You may use other cases in addition to the above case if you wish. ( this essay should be no more than 700 words) For this assignment you will produce: · A hand out on the presentation you have prepared for task 2. · A 1000 word written essay, Plus 700 word essay to be handed in on Moodle which will be checked by Turnit-in.

Please note case law quoted will not be considered plagiarism for this assignment. Date set: 05/12/2016 Date for draft submission (if applicable): Date for submission: 27/1/2017 Extension date (if agreed): Signed by Tutor/Assessor to agree extension: Date submitted: Learner declaration: · The explanations and evaluations in this work have been developed and written by me. · I have not submitted material copied from the Internet, text books or other sources in place of my own thinking and writing. · When I have referred to the work of others I have done so to discuss, comment on or argue their ideas. · I have kept quotation and paraphrasing to an absolute minimum and only to support points I have made. · I understand that referencing the names of authors whose ideas I have used without including my own interpretation of those ideas, does not meet the assessment criteria and cannot attract the Pass, Merit or Distinction grades. · I have not copied the work of my peers Learner comments: (please use this space to comment on any aspect of the assignment when handing in your work) Signature: Date: TO THE LEARNER: Please attach this assignment brief to any written work you are handing in for offline assessment, or submit the brief as instructed.

YOUR WORK CANNOT BE ASSESSED UNLESS YOU HAVE SIGNED AND SUBMITTED THIS FORM Level 2/3 (please circle) Unit title: This assignment addresses the following Assessment Criteria from the unit (or a copy of the unit may be attached, if all AC are covered) : AC no Level Three 1.1 Analyse the three elements required in the tort of negligence using a wide range of relevant case law. 2.1 Analyse the defences available to the tort of negligence. 3.1 Analyse the law relating to vicarious liability using case law. Level 3 units only: Learners achieve a Pass if they meet all Level 3 Assessment Criteria for a unit. You will achieve a Merit or Distinction by meeting the following Grade Descriptors.

Your tutor will give you feedback for all three grades. Grade Descriptor 1 Merit Distinction Understanding of Knowledge The student, students’ work or performance demonstrates a very good grasp of relevant knowledge and demonstrates a very good understanding of different perspectives associated with the area of study. The student, students’ work or performance demonstrates an excellent grasp of relevant knowledge and demonstrates an excellent understanding of different perspectives associated with the area of study. Grade Descriptor 2 Merit (Choose one or more relevant grade components) Distinction (Choose one or more relevant grade components) Application of Knowledge The student, student’s work or performance makes use of relevant theories and concepts with very good levels of consistency and analysis.

The student, student’s work or performance makes use of relevant theories and concepts with excellent levels of consistency and analysis. Grade Descriptor 7 Merit (Choose one or more relevant grade components) Distinction (Choose one or more relevant grade components) Quality Learner’s work, taken as a whole, demonstrates a very good response to the demands of the brief/assignment. Learner’s work, taken as a whole, demonstrates an excellent response to the demands of the brief/assignment. Grade Guidance: Learners must carefully read the guidance below which is linked to the components above MERIT: (e.g. To achieve a Merit your work will show…..) To achieve a Merit you will show that you have generally applied the relevant theories and concepts to your explanations and observations.

You will have demonstrated using appropriate case law, very good levels of consistency in your analysis, assessment and application of the various ideas in the subject matter. You will have supported your explanations and arguments and any suggestions which you make with clear and relevant evidence and examples. Your work will be written in a generally fluent and coherent style using a register generally appropriate to your purpose. Your work will generally exhibit a logical progression and development of ideas and explanations relevant to the sphere of the task you have been set. Your answer will be informed by accurate use of technical and specialist language.

DISTINCTION: (e.g. To achieve a Distinction your work will show…..) To achieve a distinction you will show that you have consistently applied the relevant theories and concepts to your explanations and observations. You will have demonstrated using appropriate case law, excellent levels of consistency in your analysis, assessment and application of the various ideas in the subject matter. You will have supported your explanations and arguments and any suggestions which you make with very clear and relevant evidence and examples. Your work will be written in a consistently fluent and coherent style using a register consistently appropriate to your purpose.

Your work will consistently exhibit a logical progression and development of ideas and explanations relevant to the sphere of the task you have been set. Your answer will be consistently informed by accurate use of technical and specialist language. Part A: Feedback on credit level AC no Credit achieved (L2/L3) Location of evidence Tutor/Assessor comments on assessment criteria (you could also indicate on the work itself where each AC is met) 1.1 GD1 GD2 GD..1 Level achieved Tutor/Assessor’s signature: Paul Cook Date: Resubmission (if applicable) If any of the assessment criteria for this assignment have not been met at Level 3, a resubmission may be permitted. Resubmission must follow the QAA guidelines and be permitted only once.

Requirements for resubmission/new Task set:. Date Set: 6/2/2017 Date due: Date Submitted: Feedback on resubmission: Level achieved after resubmission: Tutor/Assessor’s signature: Date: Part B: Feedback on grading (Applicable only if all assessment criteria achieved at Level 3) Grade Descriptor Tutor/Assessor comments against grade descriptors Grade indicator (P/M/D) Please enter the final grade on page 1 based on this grade profile e.g. PPM=P Understanding of Knowledge Application of Knowledge GD7: Quality Tutor/Assessor’s reason for final grade decision (if applicable): Regev, Motti, and Seroussi, Edwin. Popular Music and National Culture in Israel (1). Berkeley, US: University of California Press, 2004.

ProQuest ebrary. Web. 26 January 2017. Regev, Motti, and Seroussi, Edwin. Popular Music and National Culture in Israel (1).

Berkeley, US: University of California Press, 2004. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 26 January 2017. Regev, Motti, and Seroussi, Edwin.

Popular Music and National Culture in Israel (1). Berkeley, US: University of California Press, 2004. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 26 January 2017.