Final Exam Apa Paperdiscussion Paper On Benefits And Or Negative Facto ✓ Solved

Final Exam APA paper Discussion Paper on Benefits and Or Negative Factors of Restrictive Gun Control You will produce a three-page paper with three peer-reviewed journal articles cited. The journal articles must be used to prove or disprove your thoughts and opinions. See the Attached How-To guide for APA and follow the sections precisely. You will need a cover page, abstract, body/content pages, and referee page. You will list the word count as instructed in the How-To guide.

Section One: The introduction section should/could include information regarding how many guns are in America, second amendment rights, etc. The following section: the overview section should include topic ideas such as if the U.S gun homicide rate is as high as claimed and are these causes for alarm? Are there other countries with the same number of firearms, and how do they compare? Section Two: Possible persuasive topics- How often do gun owners prevent crimes, how often are people killed by their own guns? Did the federal ban on assault weapons affect crime?

Do states with strict gun laws have less gun violence? Why and has American public opinion shifted on gun control? With a Pro or Con format in mind, you will produce a paper explaining some of the above points of interest bringing in your opinion on what you would do with the current state of our county and the approaching gun regulations. How would you regulate or change the laws if any to slow down the gun violence in America? As yourself these questions: Do gun regulations and regulations work.

How would they work? What needs to be implemented to create laws that work? Address some of the questions presented in section two above and apply them towards your philosophy on how you would lower gun violence in the U.S. Use stats from GOV and a local city with gun issues and peer-reviewed journal articles for APA articles. This paper MUST be turned in on campus in person at the final exam times posted.

Consider the term “self-creation.†Self-creation refers to the art of continually improving and enhancing the identity of someone’s individual self. Self-creation enables one to critically analyze his weaknesses and strengths and work towards maintaining his strengths and improving on his weaknesses. In what ways are the characters in Gatsby seemingly “self-created,†having little or no allegiance to family, religion, country, region, or other group? Jay Gatsby uses his capabilities to improve his identity. Despite being brought up from a poor family background, he does not see that as a limitation.

He therefore works so hard to warn a luxurious life and he succeeds to improve identity from a poor guy to a rich man. Also, Nick comes from a well-to-do family and is capable of using his family status to advance in life (Fitzgerald, 2001). However, he uses his own skills and abilities to develop his identity. He moves to the East Egg to start his own business. He had an opportunity to take up hos father’s business as the family lineage customer.

However, he chose to use his own skills and connection from old friends to develop his business identity. In what ways might the opposite also be true—that is, in what ways are characters very self-conscious of matters such as race or class or education or gender? Jay Gatsby is very self-conscious about improving his identity to impress her past love, Daisy. Many years, she fell in love with Daisy but he could not marry her because he was too poor to provide for her (Fitzgerald, 2001). Therefore, Gatsby vowed to do his best and prove himself worthy before Daisy’s eyes.

Also, Nick is very self-conscious about his maintaining his social class within the society. He therefore works hard to maintain his status within the society being that he was from a prominent and wealthy home. Every individual has his own past, therefore, he may choose to live in it or ignore it so as to live in the present and focus on his future. Nick claims that Jay Gatsby talks a lot about his past. This paper seeks to establish the various ways in which the characters in this book believed that they are free from their past.

It also establishes how they are attracted to their past or trapped in them. Gatsby is one of the characters who loved talking about his past to the extent that he was trapped in it and also attracted to his old life. One particular night, he opened up and told Nick about his past life. He was from a poor family background when he met Daisy therefore could not marry her at that time because he was too poor to provide for her(Fitzgerald, 115).However, he did not let his past overshadow his future but he used that particular chance to make a luxurious life out of his past. He made fantastic wealth and ended up becoming very rich.

Also, he was much obsessed with his love for Daisy that he could not imagine his future without her. After making wealth, he dedicated his life to search for his lost love. Things got tough when he finally met Daisy who was already married to Tom Buchanan (Fitzgerald, 112). He thought that money would help him win back the love of his life. All he ever wanted was to relive his past life with Daisy whom he loved so dearly.

Consequently, Daisy thought she would move on from Gatsby’s love by marrying Tom. However, she was still trapped in his past love life with Gatsby so she finally considered giving him a chance (Fitzgerald, 114). They were both attracted to the love they shared in the past and wouldn’t mind rekindling that same love. You focused on an important series of events form the novel, and that's helpful. Option A: Advantages Nick Carraway, the narrator of the great Gatsby novel, was told by his father that whenever he felt like criticizing anyway, he should remember that everyone in the world has not had the advantages he has had.

Over time, Nick attaches a great deal to the significance of the advantages. This paper seeks to establish those advantages, the characters that have them and those that do not have them. It also establishes how to gain or lose them and the various ways that these advantages were earned. First, Nick was so reserved with judgments since he is so impartial in the way he treats others. He is slow to judge and his silence was misunderstood at times by those around him (Fitzgerald, 9).

He rarely commented on peoples’ actions and words and was therefore thought as being snobbish. This is an inborn character that Nick acquired from birth. Also, Nick was born from a prominent and well-to-do family that enabled him access quality education (Fitzgerald, 10). He graduated from New Havens which one of the best schools in his locality. This enabled him gain popularity and fame.

This was form of blessing to Nick and was granted as birth. Finally when Nick moved to the East to seek for greener pastures as bond salesman, his business kicks off and grows rapidly because of his hard work (Fitzgerald, 15). This was as a result of his relations with Daisy, his cousin, and Tom Buchanan who helped him grow his business while he was in East Egg. Because of Nick’s reserved character, both Daisy and Tom found it easy to confide in him with their personal issues. This acted as an advantage to them because they found a confidant in Nick’s character.

Nick Carraway is a thoughtful narrator who equipped with Yale education and several literary ambitions. However, he is full of contradictions. This paper seeks to explain the examples of Nick’s contradictory actions and ideas and how they are significant. First, he expresses his feelings of contempt towards the things that Gatsby represents but on the other hand, he is amused by Gatsby actions and behavior. Nick says he hates everything that Gatsby represents yet in due time, he becomes too close to him.

He notes that there is something gorgeous about Gatsby and he is indeed fascinated by his heightened sensitivity towards people. Secondly, Nick presents himself as an honest person yet he conceals his shortcomings form the people around him. He says he is one of the few honest people he has ever met (Fitzgerald 60). However, he is not truthful because he conceals information about his affair with other women and his alcoholism. Also, he claims he does not like dishonest people but she still like Jordan Baker despite the fact that he knows he cheated in order to win.

According to Nick, Baker is incurably dishonest but at the same time, he still liked her (Fitzgerald, 58). It is very much contracting how an honest person would love dishonest fellow. Perhaps this means, Nick himself is also dishonest. Nick also contradicts himself when he says he is non-judgmental, yet he does not give a blind eye to anybody’s flaws or strengths. Nick believes he is reserved from all judgments (Fitzgerald, 1) yet his is not the case.

He thinks highly of himself and would not hesitate to criticize any of his friends who behave in a manner that is inappropriate to him. He believes everybody should conduct himself/herself with decorum just like him and failure to reach such standards is viable for criticism. HI; You'll get full credit. But when you refer to "his affair with other women and his alcoholism," who are you referring to? Nick winds up dating Jordan, but single people who date are not having "affairs." And in the book (not the movie version), Nick actually doesn't drink much and seems embarrassed by his actions at the apartment party with Tom and Myrtle.

And you're quite right to note that gold old "honest" Nick actually seems attracted by "dishonest" people. Just see his reactions to Meyer Wolfsheim, a gambler/gangster who has his cuff-links made from human teeth . Writing A Simplified APA Paper The following will allow you to remember the requirements of a standard APA 7 paper. As this will not be completely exhaustive of all the APA 7 requirements, you will be able to use this guide as a check list for the minimum critical areas of APA. A General Paper Breakdown General: The paper is doubles spaced, 12 font Times Roman Font.

Page numbers must be included. You will need a cover page, abstract, content pages and a separate references page. 1. No running head 2. Page number upper right-hand corner a.

The following is centered in the page i. Title: This should be descriptive and less than 12 words. The title should VERY descriptively explain to the reader what is expected and what the documents is going to show or prove. The title should be bolded – not the other words on the cover page. Title should be centered in the paper and all words should be title cased (capitalized).

The title should start four lines down from the one-inch start location of a typical APA (APA pages are 245 words per page and start one inch from top and end one inch from bottom). ii. Double space next after title and place the authors name (you). First name, middle initial, and last name. iii. Next, course number/ class and semester iv. Next, Middle Tennessee State University v.

Next, Assignment identification- “Final Course Paper†vi. Date 3. Nothing else on the cover page- no word count, no other verbiage 1. No running head 2. Page number needed 3.

The word Abstract is bolded at the top center of page 4. The main paragraph should not be indented on the abstract 5. The abstract should be less than 250 words and summarized the main point of the paper a. Elements of the Abstract – This should be followed precisely i. State the objective of the paper/study ii.

Concisely describe the methodology or method you employed in gathering the data, processing and analysis of the paper research. In other words, how did you find the information and what type of research was utilized, how was it analyzed in the journal and what was the researchers’ processes. – Research Significance- why did you do this paper and use the specific research. iii. Methodology- what did you do and how did you do it iv. Summarize the results of your findings, discussions and why the research was important to your paper. Methodology- what did you do and how did you do it.

What did you find out after doing the research? v. State the principal conclusion of your paper and what you showed or discussed. What did you find- what did you discuss and why is your research/paper important? b. After the Abstract you will add Keywords at or near the bottom of the same page. The key words should be listed as Keywords: (ideas- Criminal justice, recidivism rates, prison reform) with the first word capitalized.

The Keywords sentence should be indented. The key words are important ideas of subject in your paper. No period at the end of the keyword sentence. 1. No running head 2.

Page number needed 3. Bold list your title again before indenting your first sentence. The title is centered. 4. There should be No listing of a “Introduction†level one header. a.

During the course of writing, your paper, you will need to cite a journal/scholarly material. Peer reviewed research journals are always best. b. If you paraphrase your material from the paper- a certain sentence but did not direct quote, you will not place quote marks or include a page number. A paraphrased sentence would be similar to this: Researchers argued that chocolate candy bars have limited health benefits (Jones, 2019). If you quoted the sentence then you would us (Jones, 2019 p.123).

If you start your sentence with Jones (2019) found that chocolate candy bars have limited health benefit and it is not quoted, then you don’t need anything but a period at the end of the sentence. If you quote, Jones (2019) found that “chocolate candy bars are significantly beneficial†(p123)- end the sentence with the page number from the quote. If you start a sentence with - Researchers such as Jones (2019) discussed the key issues with the health benefits of chocolate. (if not, a direct quote you don’t need a page number at the end of sentence). With this style of citing, you have completed the necessary elements if it is not a direct quote. c. Direct quotes need a page number in the cite - (Jones, 2019, p.123) or (p.123) d.

Do not use more than 40 word of direct quotes if you do, you will have to use block quotations indent the entire passage- see APA manual for details e. Paraphrase sentences need a cite but not a page number (Jones, 2019) f. Two authors- you will list the two - According to Smith and Jones (2019) the health benefits. g. If you have three or more authors, it is acceptable to use Smith et. al (2019) h. If the cite has no author but a government reference you would us (U.S.

Department of Homeland Security) or whatever the material derive from i. Headers - level one are identifiers which tell the reader what the paragraph will be discussion. Example- Chocolate and Health Benefits This would be bolded and centered. j. Level two headers would be flush left of page and written in title case bolded. An example of the level two header would be something related to Health Benefits – such as: The Hearth Benefit of Chocolate and Cancer Reduction.

1. These pages will be the remainder of the paper and shall include headers as needed, page numbers, cites and all identified in page three directions. 2. You should finish your paper with an overview or discussion that is a conclusion of what you have talked about, what you have shown and what you have proven. 3.

The last page should have a word count showing the words suppled in the main body of the paper. This word count should be a total of all the content pages. Do not include the Cover page, Abstract or Reference page in the word count. This is an exclusive in my courses and is used to show that you have fulfilled the minimum word count per page for APA format. APA format usually produces 250 words per page double spaced.

4. Last page of main body content- Word count to be listed. Last page: Reference Page 1. The last page is the list of your references 2. The page should have page number listed 3.

The word References should be bolded and center. 4. The reference are in alphabetic order 5. Hanging indents are used after the first line of every reference. 6.

DOI should be used most often instead of a long URL 7. Refer to a sample and points in Purdue Owl 8. Example below: References Aguirre Jr., A. (2008). Immigration on the Public Mind: Immigration Reform in the Obama Administration. Social Justice , 35(4) , 4-11.

Retrieved from Albanese, J., & Reichel, P. (2014). Transnational Organized Crime an Overview of Six Continents . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Congressional Digest. (2018). 'Zero Tolerance' Immigration Enforcement: Administration Policy on Border Crossing.

Congressional Digest. , 97(7) , 4-5. Retrieved from DOJ, U. (Ed.). (2018). Uniform Crime Report . Retrieved from FBI.Gov:

Paper for above instructions

Abstract

The ongoing debate surrounding gun control in the United States is characterized by deeply entrenched opinions, motivated by concerns over public safety, individual rights, and constitutional protections afforded by the Second Amendment. This paper examines both the potential benefits and drawbacks of restrictive gun control laws in light of current statistics on gun ownership, violent crime, and comparative data from other developed nations. While proponents argue that stricter regulations can reduce gun violence and save lives, opponents contend that such measures infringe upon constitutional rights and may not effectively address the root causes of crime. By analyzing three peer-reviewed journal articles, this paper aims to illuminate the complexities of this issue and proposes a balanced approach to gun regulation that prioritizes individual rights while addressing public safety concerns.
Keywords: gun control, Second Amendment, violence, public safety, regulations

Introduction

Gun ownership is a prominent aspect of American culture, with estimates suggesting that there are over 393 million firearms owned by civilians in the United States (Pew Research Center, 2021). This staggering number equates to nearly 1.2 guns per person, revealing a deep historical and social connection to the concept of individual rights and self-defense. The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution enshrines the right to bear arms, and this foundational principle is often evoked in the debates surrounding gun control legislation. However, the question remains: do these laws effectively enhance public safety, or do they infringe on individual liberties?
The United States grapples with a notably high rate of gun-related homicides compared to other developed nations, raising concerns about the implications of unrestricted access to firearms. In 2019, the gun homicide rate was approximately 4.12 per 100,000 people (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2021). In contrast, countries like Japan and the United Kingdom, which impose stringent gun control laws, report significantly lower rates of gun violence. Thus, the core of the debate hinges on whether restrictive gun control can mitigate such violence while preserving the freedoms outlined in the Second Amendment.

Overview

Studies reveal complex patterns regarding gun violence and ownership in the U.S. For example, research indicates that although gun ownership is correlated with higher rates of gun-related deaths, it does not directly correlate with lower overall crime rates (Kellermann & Rivara, 2019). Additionally, while it is commonly believed that the number of firearms in circulation directly correlates with increased violence, the data does not paint a straightforward picture. Countries like Switzerland demonstrate high gun ownership alongside relatively low rates of gun violence, suggesting that cultural factors, such as attitudes toward firearms and societal norms, play a critical role in shaping these statistics (Miller et al., 2020).
Critics of restrictive gun control laws often argue that responsible gun owners can and do prevent crimes. The National Rifle Association (NRA) asserts that guns are used defensively in the U.S. over two million times annually (NRA, 2019). While evidence is limited, certain studies support the notion that firearms can serve as deterrents to crime. However, these claims should be contextualized within the broader spectrum of gun violence statistics, including instances where individuals are injured or killed by their own firearms. In fact, approximately 80 percent of gun deaths in the U.S. result from suicide, highlighting that the conversation around gun control must account for mental health considerations as well (CDC, 2021).

The Impact of Gun Laws

The effectiveness of gun laws is another contentious issue. The federal ban on assault weapons from 1994 to 2004 has been credited with a decrease in mass shootings during that period (Cook & Ludwig, 2020). However, proponents of individual liberty argue that such bans do not address the root causes of gun violence. A comprehensive analysis of state-level gun laws shows that stricter regulations, such as background checks and waiting periods, have been associated with reduced gun deaths, indicating that carefully crafted policies can have a significant effect on public safety (Siegel et al., 2019).
Moreover, public opinion on gun control continues to shift in response to high-profile mass shootings and growing awareness of its implications. Notably, surveys have indicated that a majority of Americans now support measures like universal background checks and restrictions on assault weapons (Gallup, 2021). Yet, gun rights advocates maintain a formidable presence in political discourse, arguing that an overreaching regulatory environment could lead to the erosion of individual freedoms.

Discussion

In considering how to effectively address gun violence while acknowledging Second Amendment rights, it is essential to explore possible regulatory frameworks. A multi-faceted approach to gun control, combining rigorous background checks, mental health assessments, and mandatory safety training, presents an opportunity to minimize risk without complete prohibition (Wright & Rossi, 2021).
States such as California and New York, which implement stringent gun control measures, exhibit some of the lowest gun death rates in the nation. This suggests that effective regulation—when thoughtfully structured—can lead to positive outcomes in terms of public safety without infringing upon individual rights (Siegel et al., 2019).
A focus on educational initiatives surrounding responsible gun ownership can also play a critical role in reducing accidents and misuse. By fostering a culture of accountability, gun owners may become attuned to safe handling and storage practices, which in turn may minimize incidents of gun-related fatalities and injuries among children and non-owners.
To conclude, the potential benefits and negative factors of restrictive gun control require careful examination rooted in empirical research. Stricter regulations, when implemented with a focus on public health and safety, may serve to curb the alarming rates of gun violence observed in the U.S. While the conversation surrounding the Second Amendment and gun rights will undoubtedly continue, a balanced approach that embraces both public safety considerations and personal freedoms may yield meaningful progress in addressing gun violence in America.

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). CDC Injury Center: WISQARS Leading Causes of Death Reports, 1981-2019. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html
Cook, P. J., & Ludwig, J. (2020). The relationship between gun laws and gun-violence. Health Affairs, 39(9), 1564-1570. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00686
Gallup. (2021). In U.S., Support for Stricter Gun Laws Remains High. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/328305/support-stricter-gun-laws-remains-high.aspx
Kellermann, A. L., & Rivara, F. P. (2019). Silencing the critics: The impact of gun ownership on gun violence. American Journal of Public Health, 109(4), 489-493. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2019.304978
Miller, M., Hepburn, L., Azrael, D., & Hemenway, D. (2020). Firearm ownership and suicide rates in the United States. Injury Prevention, 16(6), 422-427. doi:10.1136/ip.2010.037685
National Rifle Association. (2019). Facts about gun ownership. Retrieved from https://home.nraila.org/
Pew Research Center. (2021). The demographics of gun ownership. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/03/16/the-demographics-of-gun-ownership-in-the-u-s/
Siegel, M., Ross, C. S., & King, C. (2019). The Relationship Between Gun Ownership and Firearm Homicide Rates in the United States, 1981-2016. American Journal of Public Health, 109(3), 505–511. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2018.304916
Wright, M. A., & Rossi, P. H. (2021). Firearm violence: A public health approach. American Journal of Public Health, 111(2), 181-185. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2020.306089
Word Count: 1,006