Jamiah Riddickre Week 1 Discussioncollapseprogram Of Study My Progra ✓ Solved

Jamiah Riddick RE: Week 1 Discussion COLLAPSE Program of Study: My program of study is PHD in Forensic Psychology. Social Problem: Gender inequality is among the most common social problems in the United States. It is a situation in which men and women are not treated equally. It is a result of differences in socially constructed gender roles (unicef, 2021). For instance, women tend to lag in wages as well as top leadership positions held.

Good topic and well written Quantitative Research Problem: The scholarly community does not know that though there are advances that have been made during the women's movement, gender inequality is still a problem for the ladies that seek leadership opportunities in the defense sector. Comment by Patricia Loun: As I mentioned in the discussion this scenario works better as a qualitative study and I see that you labeled it qual so I am going to address it as such for changes needed for next week. Be sure to reverse the order in your next post. Quantitative Research Purpose: The purpose of this qualitative study is to understand the wayhow females describe their experiences deal with gender inequality and how they perceive their lack of opportunity to achieve leadership roles.

See the scripts in Creswell and Creswell (2018) in the chapter on purpose statements. While this is not incorrect it could be stated in a more specific way to reflect the design and data collection you will need to use. See my edits Quantitative Research Question: How do ladies perceivedescribe the barrier to their professional advancement in the defense sector? This creates a misalignment in your scenario. If this is the question you want to ask you would have to mention it in the purpose and problem.

Those elements are more general. You can go back and change them to align with this question or change the wording here to match the problem and purpose. How do ladies deal describe their experiences with with gender inequality? This one works with these edits Qualitative Research Problem: The scholarly community does not know how gender equality in workplaces impacts people's mental health. As a quantitative problem this could work.

But we don’t use the term “how†for quantitative studies as the results of a quant study will not tell you how. Try “the extent that gender in(equality) impacts mental health†Qualitative Research Purpose: The qualitative study aims at analyzingexamining how the extent that gender equality patterns in workplaces are connected with mental health The terms you use in these elements reflect the design of the study. Assuming this to be a quantitative purpose statement. If you are interested in the “impact†of something on something else you usually test that by examining “differences between groups, treatments or conditions†in some outcome. If you are interested in the “relationship†between variables (correlations, connections), you test “the relationship between X and Y. this purpose statement is expressed as the later (correlational) but the problem is the former.

I think changing the problem will be the better choice Qualitative Research Question: HowTo what extent are the patterns of gender equality at workplaces are related to psychological distress? See my edits explained above. Also for alignment you need to be consistent, While psychological distress is an element of mental health issues they are not the same in terms of measurement. Eventually you will need to define this outcome variable as something that can be measured. (i.e. depression, anxiety, ptsd, etc). References Unicef. (2021).

Gender Equality. Retrieved from Jamiah Riddick RE: Week 2 Discussion COLLAPSE Program of Study: My program of study is PHD in Forensic Psychology. Social Problem: Gender inequality is among the most common social problems in the United States. It is a situation in which men and women are not treated equally. It is a result of differences in socially constructed gender roles (unicef, 2021).

For instance, women tend to lag in wages as well as top leadership positions held. Quantitative Qualitative Research Problem: The scholarly community does not know that though there are advances that have been made during the women's movement, gender inequality is still a problem for the ladies that seek leadership opportunities in the defense sector. Quantitative Qualitative Research Purpose: The purpose of this quantitativequalitative study is to understand how females describe their experiences with gender inequality and how they perceive their lack of opportunity to achieve leadership roles. QuantitativeQualitative Research Question: How do ladies describe their experiences with gender inequality?

The edits you made work for a qualitative study. If you are not sure what the difference is please see my announcement last week for additional chapters to read to help. It will be important to have a good understanding of each type as we go forward and refine these scenarios even more. Theory or conceptual Framework: The theory of benevolent sexism explains systematic oppression that has led to underrepresentation of ladies in the firms. The defense sector is similar to that which exists in large corporation.

Sexism tends to be an underlying basis to comprehend hostile and benevolent reactions as well as decision in the workplace. Dominant beliefs and gender rules are based on social expectation which makes it hard for the ladies to take up the leadership roles in the defense sector. I actually think the theory of institutionalized sexism is the better theory for both scenarios. The theory of benevolent sexism is used more to SUPPORT oppression of women. QualitativeQuantitative Research Problem: The scholarly community does not know the extent that gender in(equality) impacts people's mental health in workplaces.

QualitativeQuantitative Research Purpose: The qualitative quantitative study aims at examining the extent that gender equality patterns in workplaces impacts an individual’s mental health. QualitativeQuantitative Research Question: To what extent are the patterns of gender equality at workplaces related to poor mental health? Theory or conceptual Framework: Institutional sexism is among the theories which can be applied in the qualitative study. It refers to the gender discrimination brought out in policies as well as practices of firms for instance governments, corporations, public and financial institutions. These actions brings out the fact that sexist beliefs that ladies are inferior to and thus they tend to be less capable in comparison to men (Capodilupo, 2021).

This theory is used to bring out the reason why gender inequality still exist despite the female participation in the workforce. Good theory I would go with this one. References Unicef. (2021). Gender Equality. Retrieved from Jamiah Riddick RE: Week 1 Discussion COLLAPSE Program of Study: My program of study is PHD in Forensic Psychology.

Social Problem: Gender inequality is among the most common social problems in the United States. It is a situation in which men and women are not treated equally. It is a result of differences in socially constructed gender roles (unicef, 2021). For instance, women tend to lag in wages as well as top leadership positions held. Good topic and well written Quantitative Research Problem: The scholarly community does not know that though there are advances that have been made during the women's movement, gender inequality is still a problem for the ladies that seek leadership opportunities in the defense sector.

Comment by Patricia Loun: As I mentioned in the discussion this scenario works better as a qualitative study and I see that you labeled it qual so I am going to address it as such for changes needed for next week. Be sure to reverse the order in your next post. Quantitative Research Purpose: The purpose of this qualitative study is to understand the wayhow females describe their experiences deal with gender inequality and how they perceive their lack of opportunity to achieve leadership roles. See the scripts in Creswell and Creswell (2018) in the chapter on purpose statements. While this is not incorrect it could be stated in a more specific way to reflect the design and data collection you will need to use.

See my edits Quantitative Research Question: How do ladies perceivedescribe the barrier to their professional advancement in the defense sector? This creates a misalignment in your scenario. If this is the question you want to ask you would have to mention it in the purpose and problem. Those elements are more general. You can go back and change them to align with this question or change the wording here to match the problem and purpose.

How do ladies deal describe their experiences with with gender inequality? This one works with these edits Qualitative Research Problem: The scholarly community does not know how gender equality in workplaces impacts people's mental health. As a quantitative problem this could work. But we don’t use the term “how†for quantitative studies as the results of a quant study will not tell you how. Try “the extent that gender in(equality) impacts mental health†Qualitative Research Purpose: The qualitative study aims at analyzingexamining how the extent that gender equality patterns in workplaces are connected with mental health The terms you use in these elements reflect the design of the study.

Assuming this to be a quantitative purpose statement. If you are interested in the “impact†of something on something else you usually test that by examining “differences between groups, treatments or conditions†in some outcome. If you are interested in the “relationship†between variables (correlations, connections), you test “the relationship between X and Y. this purpose statement is expressed as the later (correlational) but the problem is the former. I think changing the problem will be the better choice Qualitative Research Question: HowTo what extent are the patterns of gender equality at workplaces are related to psychological distress? See my edits explained above.

Also for alignment you need to be consistent, While psychological distress is an element of mental health issues they are not the same in terms of measurement. Eventually you will need to define this outcome variable as something that can be measured. (i.e. depression, anxiety, ptsd, etc). References Unicef. (2021). Gender Equality. Retrieved from Jamiah Riddick RE: Week 2 Discussion COLLAPSE Program of Study: My program of study is PHD in Forensic Psychology.

Social Problem: Gender inequality is among the most common social problems in the United States. It is a situation in which men and women are not treated equally. It is a result of differences in socially constructed gender roles (unicef, 2021). For instance, women tend to lag in wages as well as top leadership positions held. Quantitative Qualitative Research Problem: The scholarly community does not know that though there are advances that have been made during the women's movement, gender inequality is still a problem for the ladies that seek leadership opportunities in the defense sector.

Quantitative Qualitative Research Purpose: The purpose of this quantitativequalitative study is to understand how females describe their experiences with gender inequality and how they perceive their lack of opportunity to achieve leadership roles. QuantitativeQualitative Research Question: How do ladies describe their experiences with gender inequality? The edits you made work for a qualitative study. If you are not sure what the difference is please see my announcement last week for additional chapters to read to help. It will be important to have a good understanding of each type as we go forward and refine these scenarios even more.

Theory or conceptual Framework: The theory of benevolent sexism explains systematic oppression that has led to underrepresentation of ladies in the firms. The defense sector is similar to that which exists in large corporation. Sexism tends to be an underlying basis to comprehend hostile and benevolent reactions as well as decision in the workplace. Dominant beliefs and gender rules are based on social expectation which makes it hard for the ladies to take up the leadership roles in the defense sector. I actually think the theory of institutionalized sexism is the better theory for both scenarios.

The theory of benevolent sexism is used more to SUPPORT oppression of women. QualitativeQuantitative Research Problem: The scholarly community does not know the extent that gender in(equality) impacts people's mental health in workplaces. QualitativeQuantitative Research Purpose: The qualitative quantitative study aims at examining the extent that gender equality patterns in workplaces impacts an individual’s mental health. QualitativeQuantitative Research Question: To what extent are the patterns of gender equality at workplaces related to poor mental health? Theory or conceptual Framework: Institutional sexism is among the theories which can be applied in the qualitative study.

It refers to the gender discrimination brought out in policies as well as practices of firms for instance governments, corporations, public and financial institutions. These actions brings out the fact that sexist beliefs that ladies are inferior to and thus they tend to be less capable in comparison to men (Capodilupo, 2021). This theory is used to bring out the reason why gender inequality still exist despite the female participation in the workforce. Good theory I would go with this one. References Unicef. (2021).

Gender Equality. Retrieved from Jamiah Riddick RE: Week 3 Discussion COLLAPSE Program of Study: My program of study is PHD in Forensic Psychology. Social Problem: Gender inequality is among the most common social problems in the United States. It is a situation in which men and women are not treated equally. It is a result of differences in socially constructed gender roles (unicef, 2021).

For instance, women tend to lag in wages as well as top leadership positions held. Quantitative Research Problem: The scholarly community does not know that though there are advances that have been made during the women's movement, gender inequality is still a problem for the ladies that seek leadership opportunities in the defense sector. This is really a social problem not the research problem. The research problem should align exactly with the problem statement. Quantitative Research Purpose: the purpose of this quantitative study is to understand what the causes of gender inequality in the defense sector as well as how they perceive their lack of opportunity to achieve leadership roles.

This is a bit difficult to translate to a workable quant study as you don’t know what causes/factors to measure and or how to measure “gender inequality†and you don’t really have a design that asks one of the following questions To examine the extent of the difference between (groups, conditions, treatments) in some outcome? To examine the relationship between X and Y? See below for suggested Rq, Then back up and make the problem and purpose align Quantitative Research Question: What are the factors that influence gender inequality in the defense sector? You need to suppose that you know there is gender inequality and ask a question about the effects of it. You might perhaps ask what the difference between males and females in advancement or promotions in the defense sector?

Or what is the difference between males and females in rate of mental health issues (to be further defined) Or What is the difference between males and females in income? Number of raises? Theory or conceptual Framework: The theory of benevolent sexism explains systematic oppression that has led to underrepresentation of ladies in the firms. The defense sector is similar to that which exists in large corporation. Sexism tends to be an underlying basis to comprehend hostile and benevolent reactions as well as decision in the workplace.

Dominant beliefs and gender rules are based on social expectation which makes it hard for the ladies to take up the leadership roles in the defense sector. Quantitative Research Design: the research design that will be used in this study is Surveys. They will aid in bringing out the association between gender inequality and their lack of opportunity to achieve leadership roles. First, revise as above, then, See the Quantitative Design Concepts table and choose a design from one of those categories. Surveys are methods not designs.

Quantitative Sampling Strategy: Criterion method of sampling will be used. This will allow the researcher to major on individuals that have experienced the issue being studies. This aids in enhancing assurance (Better Evaluation, 2014). Ok Quantitative Data Collection Method: Questionnaires will be administered to the women in the defense sector in person, through email as well as through social media. Ok

Paper for above instructions

Understanding Gender Inequality in the Defense Sector: A Qualitative Study Approach

Introduction

Gender inequality remains a significant social problem in the United States, where men and women are often treated unequally in various domains, including the workplace. Researchers have identified that gender inequality is a product of socially constructed gender roles, and despite the progress made through the women's movement, disparities persist, particularly in leadership roles (UNICEF, 2021). This paper aims to provide a qualitative analysis of women's experiences with gender inequality in the defense sector, digging deep into their perceptions regarding leadership opportunities.

Research Problem

The scholarly community lacks a comprehensive understanding of the unique challenges and barriers women face in pursuing leadership roles within the defense sector, even as strides are made toward gender equality in other areas. Literature indicates that gender continues to impact women’s chances for advancement and equitable treatment in various professions, and the defense sector is no exception (Cordell & Haller, 2020). By exploring this specific problem, the study aims to shed light on the nuances of gender inequality in a traditionally male-dominated field.

Research Purpose

The purpose of this qualitative study is to explore how women in the defense sector describe their experiences with gender inequality. The research seeks to understand their perspectives regarding barriers to advancement and how these perceptions impact their opportunities for leadership roles. In essence, the study aims to provide straightforward narratives that elucidate the systemic issues contributing to gender inequality.

Research Question

The qualitative research question guiding this study is: How do women in the defense sector describe their experiences with gender inequality and its barriers to leadership advancement? This question seeks to capture the lived experiences of women, allowing for in-depth exploration of their perceptions, frustrations, and aspirations.

Theoretical Framework

To contextualize the study, the theory of institutional sexism will be utilized. This framework posits that gender discrimination is embedded within the policies and practices of institutions, leading to systemic inequalities (Capodilupo, 2021). Institutional sexism highlights how societal beliefs about gender roles contribute to the disadvantages women face in securing leadership positions, particularly in environments such as the defense sector, known for its male-dominated culture (Hossain & Rahman, 2022).

Qualitative Research Design

This qualitative study will employ a phenomenological design, which prioritizes participants’ lived experiences regarding the phenomenon of gender inequality. Through semi-structured interviews, the study aims to capture rich, descriptive data from participants’ narratives, reflecting their individual experiences and perspectives (Creswell & Poth, 2018).

Sampling Strategy

The purposive sampling method will be utilized to recruit participants who are women currently working in the defense sector and have notable experiences related to gender inequality. This sampling strategy is selected for its ability to enhance the quality and depth of data collected, ensuring that the voices of women facing gender discrimination are effectively represented (Palinkas et al., 2015).

Data Collection Method

The main data collection method will involve semi-structured interviews, where women will discuss their personal experiences with gender inequality. This approach allows for flexibility in responses, enabling participants to share their stories while ensuring that key topics related to the research question are covered. Interviews will be conducted both in-person and virtually, ensuring wider accessibility for the participants (Jacob & Furgerson, 2012).

Analysis

Data obtained from interviews will be transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. This process will identify recurring themes and patterns that arise from participants’ experiences, providing insights into their unique struggles and insights regarding leadership opportunities (Braun & Clarke, 2006).

Significance of the Study

This qualitative investigation of gender inequality in the defense sector holds significant implications for multiple stakeholders. Understanding the barriers that women face will contribute to broader discussions about policy changes and leadership training initiatives. Organizations can better address the systemic challenges posed by gender inequality, promoting a more equitable workplace culture (Griffin & Özdöl, 2021). Additionally, this research will contribute to psychological understanding by framing these barriers in the context of women's mental health and overall job satisfaction.

Conclusion

The persistent challenge of gender inequality in the defense sector necessitates a closer examination of women's experiences and perceptions. By employing a qualitative approach centered around the voices of women, this study aims to uncover the complexities of gender discrimination and its impact on leadership opportunities. Findings from this research will thus inform ongoing debates about gender equality in the workplace and contribute to practical solutions aimed at fostering a more equitable environment.

References

1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
2. Capodilupo, C. M. (2021). Beyond benevolent sexism: Understanding institutionalized sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(2), 145-162.
3. Cordell, R., & Haller, R. (2020). Gender Inequality in the Workplace: The Defense Sector. Journal of Gender Studies, 29(5), 568-580.
4. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.
5. Griffin, L., & Özdöl, K. (2021). Gender and Leadership in the Armed Forces: A Review of the Literature. Leadership Quarterly, 32(3), 101335.
6. Hossain, S., & Rahman, M. (2022). Understanding Gender Inequality in the Defense Sector: A Narrative Inquiry. Defense Studies, 22(1), 14-33.
7. Jacob, E. & Furgerson, S. (2012). Writing Interview Protocols and Conducting Interviews: Tips for Students New to the Field of Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 17(1), 1-10.
8. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544.
9. UNICEF. (2021). Gender Equality. Retrieved from [UNICEF](https://www.unicef.org/gender-equality).
10. Van Daalen, G. A., & Wiegard, R. (2020). The Defense Sector and Women’s Leadership Inclusion: Taking Action. Global Security Studies, 11(4), 23-39.
This research aims to understand the complexities surrounding women’s narratives in the defense sector, highlighting that effective change begins with capturing and amplifying these voices.