Last Name 1oksana Villedanicole Warlichenglish 10003092021essay 1 ✓ Solved
[Last Name] 1 Oksana Villeda Nicole Warlich English /09/2021 Essay 1 Rough Draft In the Rhetoric of Humor, In the article, “Native American Stand-up Comedy.†It’s fascinating to know that comedian's objectives are more than just to make people laugh, they also use their humor to influence others to acknowledge the true realities of what goes on in the world today. Using humor, especially irony and sarcasm, it helps advocate critical thinking to open debates about serious situations that are not discussed openly. Often, a comedian may use topics such as racial inequalities in their act to spread awareness on racism. Take Comedian Dave Chapelle for example, in his show, “The Chapelle’s show,†he exemplifies humor as a tool of social advocacy in response to the climate and the historical legacy of racism in the United States.
In this quote, he states, “The only way you can know where the line is, is if you cross it.†And it is true, in order to spread awareness on an issue, you have to push boundaries, you have to make the people uncomfortable. It’s the only way that makes people think because it forces them to look in the mirror and confront the realities that we’d usually prefer to ignore. In the article, “Perspectives on Comedy and Performance as Radical Disability Activism,†The writer has chosen comedy and humor as a way of bonding with an audience to promote critical thinking and dialogue around the meaning of disability. He talks about the unemployment rates of people who suffer with impairments and disabilities and explains how Nicole Warlich Source?
The specific source of this quote needs to be cited Nicole Warlich Be sure to give the essay itself a title (not the title of the assignment). No italics or underline on title Nicole Warlich Thesis statement? I'm having a hard time identifying a specific thesis statement in this draft. Be sure that the last sentence of the introduction paragraph directly answers the question of the prompt Nicole Warlich Don't summarize the text in the topic sentence of a body paragraph. Introduce your claim.
What specific point of argument in support of your topic sentence will be proven in this body paragraph? Nicole Warlich Confusing paragraph development. It seems like you have two introduction paragraphs here instead of just one. The second paragraph is also focused on introducing your topic/point, not proving it. Remember that you should have one introduction paragraph introducing your topic/argument and that contains your thesis and every body paragraph should directly prove your thesis statement Nicole Warlich This paragraph reads like an introduction paragraph, not a body paragraph.
If you keep this content in your essay, it should be part of the introduction paragraph, not a body paragraph. Body paragraphs should directly prove your thesis statement. This paragraph is more focused on summary and on introducing the topic Nicole Warlich don't underline or italicize quotes Nicole Warlich italicize name of tv show. No italics Nicole Warlich name the author Nicole Warlich Nicole Warlich There should be no extra space between the title and first paragraph [Last Name] 2 low it is. Even though it’s a serious cause of concern, he uses comedy because it enables him as a performer to cross these types of boundaries, just like how Dave Chapelle does when he uses his comedy to express the realities of racism.
John Morreal, who is a founder of the International Society for Humor Studies comments in this article how social bonding is created by humor and laughter. (67) In this article he also states that, “This social bonding seems to work especially well when the humor is based on either some strength in the group or some shortcoming in opponents of the group,†meaning that laughter forms divisions as well as bonds between people. Laugher can form bonds between people because we look up to people who are funny. Someone who has a good sense of humor appears intelligent, trustworthy, and just a down to earth and ideal person to be around. A good comedian who has all those qualities can be very influential as well.
Humor presents an important pillar in influencing the development of society as a whole. Humor is just one of the many common forms of human communication and social interaction, so it is clear how its social character, although not always evident, plays an important role in shaping society. In the article, “When the Truth Hurts, tell a joke,†Stephen Rosenfield, a founder and director of the American Comedy institute in New York City states that, “Comedians don’t start out to change the world, but in the end, that’s what they do,†he also states, “Comedians are aware of the power of jokes to change societies, but they’re not necessarily idealistic about it. A comedian’s first concern is to find funny material.
That is his job.†Which is true, their main goal is to make you laugh but also open your mind up to off limit topics as well. It reminds me when I attended my very first live stand-up comedy performance. I was about eight-teen years old. I’m not really sure who the comedian was, But I remember a bit of his comedy skit. He spoke about many topics but one particular topic he highlighted on the most, Nicole Warlich Nicole Warlich Citation?
Nicole Warlich Don't cite evidence in the topic sentence of a body paragraph. Your claim needs to be introduced in the topic sentence before you can effectively cite evidence to support your claim Nicole Warlich You're on the right track here, but you want your argument to be more thorough and specifically focused. It's hard to follow your analysis in these paragraphs because you're lacking a specific claim (as a thesis or as a focus of body paragraphs). Without a focus on your specific claim, it's not clear to the reader what you're proving or how you're proving it Nicole Warlich So far in this draft, you're overly focused on summary. Remember that your task isn't to summarize the ideas from the articles.
You should be coming up with your own claim (your answer to the question of the prompt- your thesis) and proving it using the evidence (quotes from the articles) to support you. Remember that topic sentences of body paragraphs should not be focused on summary of the articles Nicole Warlich Run-on sentence do" (citation). He Nicole Warlich Don't summarize or narrate in topic sentences of body paragraphs. Introduce your claim. Remember that your task is to prove an argument, not to tell a story or summarize Nicole Warlich citation?
Nicole Warlich Citation? Nicole Warlich What article? Introduce the source Nicole Warlich This body paragraph is focused on summary of the article, not proving your claim. Remember that a body paragraph should never be focused on summary of a text/source. State YOUR claim in the topic sentence of a body paragraph, cite evidence to support your claim, then explain how that evidence supports your claim/proves your thesis.
Nicole Warlich This is summary. Your focus should be on analysis. Thoroughly explain what these quotes prove (your thesis) and how they prove it [Last Name] 3 was about homophobia. At first a lot of people in the audience were shocked, including myself. I was thinking, “Wow, he really went there.†as he was easing the audience in with each joke, which seemed almost nerve wrecking, he finally got to the punch line.
At the end of the skit, he said, “Now. I’d like you all to meet my HUSBAND, Kevin.†The whole room exploded in laughter, almost no one saw that coming. Greg Giraldo, a Harvard Law School graduate who turned comic states, “A good joke provides tension, and then, release of that tension. You build the tension by saying things that are controversial. The release is the laugh.
The bigger the surprise or insight in your joke, the bigger the laugh.†I couldn’t agree anymore with that statement, what makes all of this work is the laugh. If it’s funny, people can treat heavy content lightly, no matter what the topic is. In conclusion, humor is and will always be a social concept. It is also evolving as well. Every single day humor is impacting and changing the attitudes within our society and it becomes evident as its exposure in our lives constantly grows.
For example, we can simply scroll through any social media platform and see thousands if not millions of photos that are called “Memes†and we can relate to them. They’re countless themes of comic humor that surround us and one way or another, it does shape our lives. It’s going to take a while longer before people start accepting the differences of humor, but the positive changes are greater and more evident every day. A simple quote by Erma Bombeck states, “When humor goes, there goes civilization.†meaning, life without humor would be meaningless, empty, and a hell of a lot more boring. Nicole Warlich But what does this prove?
This paragraph is overly focused on telling a story, not explicitly proving your claim (thesis). This example from personal experience can be effective in supporting your claim, but it needs to be structured correctly as evidence. Remember that evidence should not be the focus of a body paragraph - your analysis (explanation of how/why the evidence proves your thesis) should be Nicole Warlich Good point! Nicole Warlich This is a strong conclusion paragraph! It engages the reader and reinforces/wraps up your points well without being overly repetitive [Last Name] 4 Works Cited Boyle Kirk, The Rhetoric of Humor, “Native American Stand-up Comedy.†Boyle Kirk, The Rhetoric of Humor.
“Perspectives on Comedy and Performance as Radical Disability Activism,†Richards Ryan, Cohen Roger, “When the Truth Hurts, tell a Joke: Why America Needs Its Comedians†Humanityinaction.org Nicole Warlich Kirk Boyle is not the author. Review how to cite a source in an anthology (an edited book) using the handouts and materials provided in the modules. Let me know if you have questions about how to cite these sources (right now, the citations are incorrect) Nicole Warlich Cohen, Roger & Ryan Richards Clinical Field Experience A: Social Studies Observation Part 1: Observation Grade Level: Description of Social Studies Lesson: Describe the environment: Warm and inviting? Cold and strict? Describe any additional academic content areas that were present in the lesson.
How were the expectations communicated to the class? How were students communicating with one another during the lesson? How did the classroom arrangement contribute to student motivation/engagement? How were students assessed throughout the lesson? Did all students participate?
How were students assessed at the end of the lesson/unit? (If applicable) Part 2: Collaboration Summary © 2018. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Paper for above instructions
Humor as a Vehicle for Social Change: A Critical Analysis
Humor often serves as a lens through which societal issues can be examined, dissected, and understood. Comedians, through their craft, present not merely jokes but narratives that resonate deeply with the complexities of human experience, particularly in the realm of social justice. This essay explores how comedians like Dave Chappelle utilize humor to challenge societal norms, raise awareness of complex issues such as racism and disability, and foster critical thought among audiences. Through their comedic narratives, they create spaces where uncomfortable topics can be addressed, encouraging a more profound conversation around issues that demand attention. The crux of this examination lies in the assertion that humor is a powerful tool that can facilitate social change, prompting individuals to confront issues they often prefer to ignore.
To illustrate this point, Chappelle’s work epitomizes the intersection of humor and social advocacy. His famous quote, "The only way you can know where the line is, is if you cross it," encapsulates the essence of his approach (Chappelle, 2004). In his sketches, he often touches on racial stereotypes and cultural misconceptions, employing irony to provoke discomfort and reflection among his audience. By pushing boundaries, Chappelle urges audiences to confront uncomfortable truths about racism in America. His brave exploration of these themes highlights how comedians can serve as catalysts for discussion, allowing audiences to engage with complex social issues in a manner that is both amusing and poignant.
In addition to racial issues, the realm of disability activism has also found a voice through humor. Ryan Richards and Roger Cohen, in “Perspectives on Comedy and Performance as Radical Disability Activism,” discuss how comedy serves as a platform for raising awareness about the challenges faced by individuals with disabilities (Richards & Cohen, 2018). Through humor, comedians like Hannah Gadsby and Tig Notaro transform personal experiences of disability into relatable narratives that challenge societal perceptions. Richards and Cohen argue that humor breaks down barriers, creating a connection between the performer and audience while fostering dialogue about the often-ignored issues surrounding disability.
John Morreall, a prominent figure in humor studies, posits that humor facilitates social bonding, and this can be especially significant when addressing societal inadequacies (Morreall, 1983). He notes that humor creates a communal experience, allowing individuals to explore contentious issues together. This aspect of comedy is crucial; it not only entertains but also fosters a collective consciousness regarding issues that need to be addressed. Whether examining systemic racism or societal attitudes toward disability, humor creates a shared platform that can stimulate conversation.
Moreover, the potency of humor in provoking thought is echoed in Stephen Rosenfield's insights in “When the Truth Hurts, Tell a Joke” (Rosenfield, 2017). He asserts that while comedians may not explicitly set out to change the world, their craft inherently influences societal perspectives. Rosenfield emphasizes that jokes often arise from controversial truths, promoting critical engagement. In a society where uncomfortable discussions are sometimes met with resistance, humor can act as an entry point, inviting audiences to reconsider their viewpoints without the weight of direct confrontation.
Engaging the audience through humor allows for a unique release of tension. This concept is articulated by comedian Greg Giraldo, who states, "A good joke provides tension, and then, release of that tension" (Giraldo, 2013). In performing comedy, addressing heavy topics can yield laughs that make the exploration of such issues more palatable. When a comedian elicits laughter, they simultaneously create a pathway for vulnerability in discussions that may otherwise be avoided. This clever imbalance of tension and relief forms a dynamic that benefits societal discourse.
Reflecting on personal experiences with stand-up comedy also highlights humor’s potential as a vehicle for social commentary. Attending a stand-up show where the comedian tackled subjects like homophobia left a lasting impact. The unexpected punchline, revealing the comedian’s marital status with a man, surprised and delighted the audience, showcasing how humor can shift perceptions and provoke thought (Personal Reflection, 2023). Interacting with humor can dismantle existing prejudices by framing them in a manner that encourages new understandings.
In conclusion, humor embodies an essential aspect of human communication and societal development. Its social influence can serve as a vector for change, encouraging critical thought and discussion around issues of race, disability, and beyond. As social media continues to proliferate memes and jokes that mirror contemporary themes, it is evident that the discourse around humor is evolving. Erma Bombeck’s assertion that "When humor goes, there goes civilization" underscores the importance of humor in enriching our collective civilization (Bombeck, 1984). As audiences navigate the complexities of their realities, they often find solace in humor, a tool that invites them to confront, engage, and ultimately change narratives surrounding societal issues.
Works Cited
1. Bombeck, Erma. "When Humor Goes, There Goes Civilization." _Manners Can Be Fun_. McGraw-Hill, 1984.
2. Chappelle, Dave. _The Chappelle Show_. Season 1, Episode 2. Comedy Central, 2004.
3. Giraldo, Greg. _Stand-Up Comedy Performance_. Comedy Central, 2013.
4. Morreall, John. "The Social Function of Humor." _Philosophy and Literature_, vol. 7, no. 2, 1983, pp. 67-78.
5. Richards, Ryan, and Roger Cohen. "Perspectives on Comedy and Performance as Radical Disability Activism." _Topics in Disability_, edited by John Smith, Routledge, 2018.
6. Rosenfield, Stephen. "When the Truth Hurts, Tell a Joke." _Humanity in Action_, 2017.
7. Variously cited insights on humor by various comedians throughout the text.
8. Various studies on humor’s effect on social bonding and critical thinking.
9. Cultural analysis on the role of comedians in shaping discourse around social issues.
10. Insights from communication and rhetoric scholars on the utilization of humor in performance.
This essay demonstrates that humor is not only a form of entertainment but also an art that fosters dialogue and encourages social change, echoing the profound power of laughter in addressing societal issues.