Ma Social Care Social Justiceassessment 1 Care And Social Justice Mo ✓ Solved

MA Social Care & Social Justice Assessment 1 Care and Social Justice Module Feb-May 2021. Dr. Majella Mulkeen Assessment 1: 50% Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with the opportunity critically assess a range of care scholarship and establish its contribution and relevance or otherwise to your personal life and professional practice context. The task You will be allocated to one theme as listed below. Each theme is examined using 2 texts.

You will use both texts for this assessment. This assessment has 2 parts. Choose 1 text to present to fellow students (15 mins) Tuesday Feb 23 / Thursday Feb 25 (Mark 25%) Choose a 2nd text from the same theme and provide a written critique of the work examining its contribution and shortcomings in light of your own personal or professional context, moving beyond description to consider the implications of the theories and empirical findings for broader understandings of care as a social justice concern (Mark 25%). Submission: please upload to Turnitin by 18hrs Sunday March 7 2021. Turnitin upload facility is on Moodle page under Assessments in the Introduction to Module.

1.Care Work: Optimizing Care at an organisational level; Impact of a lack of love on adult survivors of industrial/reformatory schools Lopez, S.H. (2006) Emotional Labour and Organized Emotional Care: Conceptualizing Nursing Home Care Work Work and Occupations Vol 33(2): Feeley, M. (2009) Ch. 10 Living in Care and Without Love – The Impact of Affective Inequalities on Learning Literacy, in Lynch et al. (eds) Affective Equality, Love Care and Injustice, pp. Both on Moodle page 2. Care Work in Nursing Homes Johnson E.K. (2015) The Business of Care: The Moral Labour of Care Workers Sociology of Health & Illness 37 (1): Dodson L. & Zincavage R. (2007) ‘It’s like a Family’ Caring, Labour Exploitation in Nursing Homes, Gender and Society , 21(6): Moodle page 3.

Care Work in Everyday Life & Social Justice implications Barnes, M. (2006) Caring and Social Justice Red Globe Press, UK Ch. 2 Perspectives on Caring & Ch 4 Sons & Daughters (chapters available on Moodle page) 4. Care and Power in the private sphere of caring Lynch, K. Lyons, M. & Cantillon, S. (2009) Ch. 7 Time to Care, Care Commanders & Care Foot Soldiers, in Lynch et al (eds) Affective Equality Love Care & Injustice .

London; Palgrave McMillan. (p.) Lynch, K. (2009) Affective Equality: Who Cares? Dublin: UCD Research Repository. BOTH on Moodle Page 5. Masculinity studies and care Hanlon, N. (2009) Masculinities, Care and Equality: Identity and Nurture in Men's Lives. London: Palgrave MacMillan; selected chapters below are uploaded to Moodle.

Ch. 3 Masculinities and Care (pp. 2-14) is a theoretical chapter about Masculinity Studies and the place of care therein. 6. Masculinity and Care: Selected research findings Hanlon, N. (2009) Masculinities, Care and Equality: Identity and Nurture in Men's Lives.

London: Palgrave MacMillan; selected chapters below are uploaded to Moodle. Care Conversations with Men (see p.28 of the uploaded material on Moodle page) Ch. 7 Nurturing Masculinities (pp. 14-26; pp. 43-65) is one of the findings chapters in which participants talk about what it means to nurture as men 7.

Care, Gender and Public Policy Russell, H. Grotti, R. Ginty, F. Privalko, I. (2019) Caring and Unpaid Work in Ireland . Dublin: ESRI & Irish Human Rights & Equality Commission[online] Ciccia, R., & Bleijenbergh, I. (2014).

After the Male Breadwinner Model? Childcare Services and the Division of Labour in European Countries. Social Politics , 21(1), 50-79 [online] SCHEDULE Tuesday Feb 23 7-9pm PRESENTATIONS Group 1: Amy, Laura, Michael, David, Aolish, Njedeke, Sabrina, in this order. This group only attends class on Feb 23rd. Group 2 only will attend on the morning of Feb 25th.

We will all be together then for the afternoon session · A. Coleman No 3. Care Work in Everyday Life & Social Justice implications · L. Connolly No. 4.

Care and Power in the private sphere of caring · M. Ebini Kingue No. 5. Masculinity studies and care · D. McCarthy No.

6. Masculinity and Care: Selected research findings · A. Gormley No. 7. Care, Gender and Public Policy · S.

Kilkeeny No. 2. Care Work in Nursing Homes · N. Reinike No. 1.

Optimizing Care at an organisational level; Impact of a lack of love on adult survivors of industrial/reformatory schools Thursday Feb 25 9.30-11.30am PRESENTATIONS Group 2 Chigebe, Laura O’C, Uche, Sarah, Laura T., Anne · C.A. Obumneme-Martins No 3. Care Work in Everyday Life & Social Justice implications · L. O’Connell No. 4.

Care and Power in the private sphere of caring · U. Okoye No. 6. Masculinity and Care: Selected research findings · S. Timoney No.

7. Care Gender & Public Policy · L. Towey No. 2. Care Work in Nursing Homes · A.

Kenny No. 1. Optimizing Care at an organisational level; Impact of a lack of love on adult survivors of industrial/reformatory schools Dr. Majella Mulkeen Jan

Paper for above instructions

Introduction

In exploring the interconnected themes of care and social justice within the social care profession, the assignment requires a critical assessment of two key texts focused on care work. This paper will analyze Lopez’s (2006) "Emotional Labour and Organized Emotional Care: Conceptualizing Nursing Home Care Work" and Feeley’s (2009) "Living in Care and Without Love – The Impact of Affective Inequalities on Learning Literacy." These texts highlight essential aspects of care work, including emotional labor, its implications on caregivers as well as care recipients, and how affective inequalities contribute to social injustice.

Text Overview

Text 1: Lopez, S.H. (2006)

Lopez’s work concentrates on the concept of emotional labor within nursing homes, emphasizing the importance of emotional competence in care work. Through her study, Lopez identifies the expectation for caregivers to exhibit warmth and empathy while managing their own emotions. She argues that this emotional labor is an integral part of nursing home work, shaping the experience of both caregivers and residents. Lopez (2006) highlights the potential for emotional exhaustion and burnout among caregivers, thereby raising questions about the sustainability of such labor practices in the context of social justice.

Text 2: Feeley, M. (2009)

In contrast, Feeley (2009) delves into the impact of affective inequalities on learning and literacy for those living in care. Her work posits that the absence of love and emotional support in institutional care settings leads to detrimental effects on individuals — particularly children and vulnerable adults. Feeley argues that the lack of affection and care not only perpetuates a cycle of emotional deprivation but can inhibit cognitive and social development. This raises critical concerns about the effectiveness and integrity of care systems within societal structures, invoking questions about systemic inequities and the necessity for profound reform to promote social justice.

Critical Analysis

Emotional Labor in Care Work

Lopez's conceptualization of emotional labor in nursing homes highlights the often-invisible work that caregivers undertake to create a nurturing environment (Lopez, 2006). Emotional labor, as defined by Hochschild (1983), involves managing feelings and expressions to fulfill the emotional requirements of a job. In the context of nursing homes, this means staff are often compelled to display emotional warmth, even when they may not feel it internally due to their stressful working conditions. As Lopez discusses, this dynamic can result in emotional exhaustion, diminishing caregivers' ability to provide high-quality care.
This phenomenon has wider implications for social justice. The expectation for emotional labor raises ethical questions concerning the treatment of care workers and the systemic undervaluation of their emotional contributions. Care work has historically been feminized and undervalued, which reflects broader societal norms around gender and labor (England et al., 2002). By situating emotional labor within a structural framework of social justice, Lopez exposes the ways in which care systems can perpetuate inequalities based on gender and class, thus calling for systemic reform to recognize and appropriately reward the emotional labor intrinsic to care work.

Affective Inequalities and Learning

Feeley’s exploration of affective inequality is particularly relevant when considering the implications of emotional deprivation in care settings. She contends that when caregivers are unable to provide love and emotional support, it creates a detrimental environment that affects an individual’s ability to learn and develop (Feeley, 2009). The absence of affectionate interactions can stifle emotional and cognitive growth, leading to lifelong repercussions for those affected.
This perspective emphasizes the importance of viewing care as a social justice concern. The lack of affection in care impacts marginalized groups more acutely, as they may already experience systemic barriers in education and social mobility. Feeley’s examination invites a rethinking of policies and practices within care institutions, advocating for frameworks that prioritize emotional well-being in addition to meeting basic needs.

Implications for Personal and Professional Contexts

The insights from both texts are highly relevant to my personal and professional experiences within the field of social care. As a social care practitioner, understanding the concept of emotional labor allows me to critically reflect on my responsibilities and the emotional weight of caregiving. It is crucial to recognize and address the long-term impacts of emotional exhaustion, as they can influence the quality of care provided to clients.
In my practice, I have witnessed the challenges faced by caregivers in maintaining a positive emotional environment in the face of their struggles. By acknowledging the impact of emotional labor, I aim to advocate for institutional policies that recognize the importance of mental health support for caregivers, creating a culture that values emotional labor.
Moreover, Feeley's exploration of affective inequalities resonates strongly with my understanding of the social determinants of health. I have encountered individuals in care environments who struggled with feelings of neglect and emotional deprivation. These experiences have motivated me to advocate for holistic approaches to caregiving that incorporate emotional and social support systems (Caldwell et al., 2020). Promoting emotional well-being is not only crucial for individual development but also essential for cultivating a more equitable society.

Conclusion

The critical examination of Lopez's and Feeley's works illuminates the multifaceted nature of care as a social justice concern. They highlight the intrinsic emotional components of care work and the consequences of neglecting those components, both for caregivers and recipients. As social care practitioners, it is imperative to recognize these factors and advocate for systemic changes that promote social justice through enhanced emotional support and recognition of caregiving as a vital component of human connection and philosophical integrity. As we pursue social justice in care, we must ensure that both caregivers and recipients are afforded the emotional nourishment they require to thrive.
---

References

1. Caldwell, D., Tackie, N. M., & Pollard, C. (2020). Transforming Social Care: An Agenda for Change. Health & Social Care in the Community, 28(4), 1005-1013.
2. Ciccia, R., & Bleijenbergh, I. (2014). After the Male Breadwinner Model? Childcare Services and the Division of Labour in European Countries. Social Politics, 21(1), 50-79.
3. England, P., Edin, K., & Kilbourne, B. (2002). The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled. Gender & Society, 16(4), 512-534.
4. Feeley, M. (2009). Living in Care and Without Love – The Impact of Affective Inequalities on Learning Literacy. In Lynch et al. (Eds.), Affective Equality, Love Care and Injustice. Palgrave McMillan.
5. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. University of California Press.
6. Lopez, S. H. (2006). Emotional Labour and Organized Emotional Care: Conceptualizing Nursing Home Care Work. Work and Occupations, 33(2), 154-178.
7. Lynch, K., Lyons, M., & Cantillon, S. (2009). Time to Care, Care Commanders & Care Foot Soldiers. In Lynch et al. (Eds.), Affective Equality Love Care & Injustice. Palgrave McMillan.
8. Russell, H., Grotti, R., Ginty, F., & Privalko, I. (2019). Caring and Unpaid Work in Ireland. Dublin: ESRI & Irish Human Rights & Equality Commission.
9. Morrow, V., & Richards, M. (1996). The Ethics of Social Research with Children: An Overview. Children & Society, 10(2), 90-105.
10. Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, Self, Culture. Routledge.