Module Titlehtmlmodule Descriptionin This Week The Student Will Begin ✓ Solved

Module Title.html Module Description In this week the student will begin the long-term process of the search for knowledge. The desire to integrate practice behaviors into practice is sound and reasonable; however, the process is more complex than it sounds. Each professional will develop a process for searching for and assessing evidence and value based practice theory and scientific discover. However there are some key components of the process that should be consistent to all researchers. In this week the student will begin developing personal research habits and discover vital components to the process.

Objectives Investigate processes for finding and evaluating research. Construct a personal research process that integrates sound theoretical and scientific results. Goals Alignment University Mission Goals- Goals 1, 2, & 3 Program Goals- 1, 2, & 3 Course Goals- 1, 2, & 3 Professional Standards Integrate nursing science with knowledge from ethics, the biophysical, psychosocial, analytical, and organizational sciences as the basis for the highest level of nursing practice. Enhanced knowledge to improve nursing practice and patient outcomes. Enhanced research skills to strengthen practice and health care delivery.

Learning Materials Mateo, M. A., & Foreman, M. D. (2013). Research for advanced practice nurses: From evidence to practice (2nd ed.). New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Chapters 1 and 2 Curley, A. L., & Vitale, P. A. (2011). Population-based nursing: Concepts and competencies for advanced practice. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Chapter 1 Use a search engine to investigate theoretical and scientific underpinnings in healthcare and professional practice on the internet. Module 2 Assignment.html Remember to submit your work following the file naming convention FirstInitial.LastName_M01.docx. For example, J.Smith_M01.docx. Remember that it is not necessary to manually type in the file extension; it will automatically append. Start by reading and following these instructions: 1.

Quickly skim the questions or assignment below and the assignment rubric to help you focus. 2. Read the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

3. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it. 4. Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling. Assignment: Researching Theory and Scientific Knowledge - Write a word essay addressing each of the following points/questions.

Support your ideas with at least three (3) scholarly citations in your essay. Use strict APA guidelines to format the paper. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount and an abstract and table of contents are not necessary and if included are not part of the overall word count. Using the three methods you identified in the discussion for this week, develop a specific, detailed step-by-step process you will use to find knowledge available in the body of knowledge for the industry. Describe where and how you will find the information.

Discuss what you found in the search. Explain how you will determine if the research you find is appropriate or inappropriate to use in developing a practice implementation model. Table of Contents.html Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings - TOUB - Sect3 - Module 1: Finding Knowledge 1. Module 1: Finding Knowledge 2. Module 1: Assignment

Paper for above instructions

Researching Theory and Scientific Knowledge: A Step-by-Step Process for Evidence-Based Practice
The process of integrating theoretical frameworks and scientific discoveries into nursing practice is not only significant but also complex. As healthcare professionals, nurses must develop a systematic approach to locate and assess research evidence that supports patient care while aligning it with ethical standards and best practices. The following essay presents a detailed step-by-step process for finding knowledge available within the nursing profession, discusses the information uncovered in the search, and outlines criteria for determining the appropriateness of this research for practical implementation.

Step-by-Step Process for Finding Knowledge

Step 1: Identifying Research Questions and Keywords
The first step in my search for evidence involves articulating specific research questions that guide my inquiry. For instance, if I am interested in understanding the effectiveness of a newly introduced pain management protocol, my research question might be, “What are the outcomes of using multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain management in adult patients?” From the question, I will generate relevant keywords, such as "multimodal analgesia," "postoperative pain," and "adult patients."
Step 2: Utilizing Academic Databases
Multiple databases are essential resources for accessing peer-reviewed and credible research. I plan to use databases such as PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Google Scholar to gather research articles and clinical guidelines. Here’s how I will navigate each database:
- PubMed: I will use advanced search options, inputting my keywords combined with Boolean operators such as “AND” and “OR” to hone in on relevant articles. Filters will allow me to limit my search results to articles published within the last five years, ensuring the information is current.
- CINAHL: This database focuses on nursing and allied health, making it invaluable for my field. Using the same keywords, I will search for articles specific to my nursing specialization and utilize the “Evidence-Based Practice” filter to focus on studies that support clinical decision-making.
- Google Scholar: I will conduct broader searches using the same keywords and gain access to various types of literature, including theses and books that can provide context and theoretical frameworks related to my research questions.
Step 3: Evaluating the Quality of Research
After identifying potentially relevant articles, the next stage involves critically appraising the quality and applicability of the research findings. I will consider the following criteria based on the framework proposed by Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine:
- Type of Study: I will prioritize systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and clinical practice guidelines as these forms of research best demonstrate the hierarchy of evidence. For example, an RCT on the efficacy of multimodal analgesia would carry more weight than a descriptive study.
- Sample Size and Population: The studies must include a sufficient sample size to ensure reliability and should be specific to the population relevant to my practice setting. A study focusing on adult surgical patients is more applicable to my scenario than one concentrating on pediatric patients.
- Outcome Measures: It is crucial that study outcomes align with the specific outcomes I aim to improve in my practice. If the research measures outcomes such as pain scores, patient satisfaction, and recovery time, it will be deemed relevant.
- Peer Review and Publication Date: I will ensure that the articles I select have undergone peer review and were published in reputable journals within the last five years to guarantee the research is credible and current.

Findings from the Search

In my initial searches, I located several studies highlighting the effectiveness of multimodal analgesia in postoperative care. A systematic review by Biswas et al. (2020) provided compelling evidence suggesting multimodal analgesia significantly reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption compared to conventional methods. This finding aligns with my practice, indicating that implementing a multimodal strategy could mitigate the risks associated with opioid use. Additionally, a clinical guideline released by the American Society of Anesthesiologists emphasized incorporating multimodal approaches for enhanced pain management, confirming the strategy’s importance in current clinical practice (American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2021).

Determining Research Appropriateness

To determine whether the research is appropriate for clinical implementation, I will consider:
1. Relevance to Practice: The findings must pertain directly to my patient population and clinical context. If the research studies emphasize effectiveness in similar demographic and surgical procedures as those in my practice, I will prioritize their incorporation into my practice framework.
2. Clinical Significance: The implication of research findings is critical. If the results translate into statistically significant improvements in patient outcomes (e.g., pain relief, reduced opioid use), then integration into practice is warranted.
3. Feasibility of Implementation: I will assess whether the recommendations from the research can be realistically implemented in my practice environment. Factors such as availability of resources, staff training, and application of protocols will be considered. If implementation requires extensive resources not currently available to me, I will seek alternative evidence that may yield similar outcomes with fewer barriers.
4. Ethical Considerations: Finally, I will ensure that the application of findings adheres to ethical standards in nursing practice. Evidence must support not only beneficial outcomes for patients but also adhere to equity and justice principles in healthcare.
In conclusion, developing a systematic approach for searching and evaluating evidence is foundational for practicing effective and ethical care in nursing. By following a defined step-by-step process for locating research, assessing its credibility, and determining its applicability, I can enhance patient care practices based on solid theoretical and scientific knowledge.

References

1. American Society of Anesthesiologists (2021). “Practice Guidelines for Chronic Pain Management.” Anesthesiology, 134(3), 494-509.
2. Biswas, A., et al. (2020). “Efficacy of multimodal analgesia in postoperative pain management: A systematic review.” Pain Medicine, 21(6), 1186-1198.
3. Curley, A.L., & Vitale, P.A. (2011). Population-based nursing: Concepts and competencies for advanced practice. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
4. Mateo, M.A., & Foreman, M.D. (2013). Research for advanced practice nurses: From evidence to practice (2nd ed.). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
5. Melnyk, B.M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.
6. Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.
7. McCarthy, C. (2020). “The role of evidence-based practice in improving patient outcomes.” Nursing Standard, 35(6), 17-23.
8. Melynk, B.M., et al. (2014). “The 2014 national evidence-based practice survey of nurses: A follow-up study.” Journal of Nursing Administration, 44(9), 494-500.
9. Ploeg, J., et al. (2007). “Modeling the evidence-based practice process: A systematic approach.” Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 4(3), 162-170.
10. Sackett, D.L., et al. (1996). “Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t.” BMJ, 312(7023), 71-72.
This essay reflects the integration of theory and evidence into nursing practice, guided by a systematic approach in searching for and evaluating research. The outlined steps provide a framework that fosters continuous professional development through evidence-based practice.