I really really need help! I have a research paper to do by midnight tomorrow an
ID: 118308 • Letter: I
Question
I really really need help!
I have a research paper to do by midnight tomorrow and I completly forgot about it and I have two exams tomorrow so is anyway I can get help at least with my summary or any part please!
This is what I need, of course I am not telling you to do it all, just help me start the summary because I am going crazy with my exams and papers.
Summary page (Overview) of the selected topic and narrow thesis that demonstrates its importance and influence.
“Pro” analysis, minimum two pages
“Con” analysis, minimum two pages
This is my narrow thesis and title which my teacher approved.
Global Warning, the Paris Agreement and Small Actions with Big Impact.
Today, global warming is one of the biggest emerging problem of mankind. A lot of researches have been done to minimize the effect of greenhouse gases on the environment which are responsible for global temperature rise. Global temperature rises due to these greenhouse gases and is responsible for many type of problems faced by mankind. All countries are trying their best to limit the production of these gases or to nullify the effect of these gases. Even a lot of agreements are signed & seminars are being conducted by various countries to bring different countries on a single platform to think about the seriousness of this issue & bring out some possible solution for the same. Some countries are taking this problem casually without analyzing the consequences of the problem as an example an agreement was signed to sets out a global action plan to put the world on track to avoid dangerous climate change by limiting global warming to well below 2°C at the Paris climate conference in December 2015, 195 countries adopted the first-ever universal, legally binding global climate deal, but US pulls out its contribution after some time. Was this a wise business action but an environmental catastrophe?
Many many thanks for anything even a paragraph you can help me with!
Explanation / Answer
Climate change is affecting every region by increasing the frequency and/or intensity of heat waves, droughts, precipitation, floods, hurricanes, and forest fires, and through impacts on ecosystems and species, including human health. Yet, most Americans perceive climate change as a problem distant in time and space, and do not recognize its indicators and impacts in their own localities.
It is important to regularly re-assess the relevance of emissions scenarios in light of changing global circumstances. In the past, decadal trends in CO2 emissions have responded slowly to changes in the underlying emission drivers because of inertia and path dependence in technical, social and political systems. Inertia and path dependence are unlikely to be affected by short-term fluctuations such as financial crises and it is probable that emissions will continue to rise for a period even after global mitigation has started. Thermal inertia and vertical mixing in the ocean, also delay the temperature response to CO2 emissions. Because of inertia, path dependence and changing global circumstances, there is value in comparing observed decadal emission trends with emission scenarios to help inform the prospect of different futures being realized, explore the feasibility of desired changes in the current emission trajectory and help to identify whether new scenarios may be needed.
Global CO2 emissions have increased from 6.1±0.3 Pg C in 1990 to 9.5±0.5 Pg C in 2011 (3% over 2010), with average annual growth rates of 1.9% per year in the 1980s, 1.0% per year in the 1990s, and 3.1% per year since 2000. We estimate that emissions in 2012 will be 9.7±0.5 Pg C or 2.6% above 2011 (range of 1.9–3.5%) and 58% greater than 1990. The observed growth rates are at the top end of all four generations of emissions scenarios.
Although current emissions are tracking the higher scenarios, it is still possible to transition towards pathways consistent with keeping temperatures below 2 °C (refs 17,19,20). The historical record shows that some countries have reduced CO2 emissions over 10-year periods, through a combination of (non-climate) policy intervention and economic adjustments to changing resource availability. The oil crisis of 1973 led to new policies on energy supply and energy savings, which produced a decrease in the share of fossil fuels (oil shifted to nuclear) in the energy supply of Belgium, France and Sweden, with emission reductions of 4–5% per year sustained over 10 or more years.