In the Challenger case, deviance was \"normalized\" by Making the \"impingement
ID: 1710633 • Letter: I
Question
In the Challenger case, deviance was "normalized" by Making the "impingement erosion" known to the astronauts. Lowering acceptable temperature for lunch from 53 degrees to 29 degrees. Making the problem of the "impingement erosion" knowing to the general public. Correcting the problem that led to the "impingement erosion". Elbert has a "conflict of interest" (in the professional sense of the term) when He has conflicting obligations to his form and to protect the safety of the public His desire to work on state-of-the art technology can conflict with a desire to work on a project that will pay him more money He wants to specify bolts the best for his design, but would also like to use the bolts made by his family firm All of the above are conflicts of interest Exploitation, especially of the weak and vulnerable, is a serious moral problem, and it is particularly likely to occur in economically underdeveloped countries, where workers have few options for jobs. Risk of exploitation arises when the following five conditions are present EXCEPT There is an economic imbalance of power between the dominant and subordinate or exploited party. The resources of the subordinate party (natural resources, labor, etc.) are used with adequate compensation. The subordinate party needs the resources provided by the dominant party to protect his or her interests. The dominant party in the relationship exercises discretionary control over the needed resources. While supervising a construction project in a developing country, an engineer discovers that his client's project manager is treating laborer in an unsafe and inhumane (but for that country, legal) manner. When he protests, the engineer is told by the company executives that the company has no choice in the matter if it wishes to remain competitive in the region, and he should just accept this as the way things are. What would ethics require the engineer to do? Take no action-the company is acting in a perfectly legal manner Withdraw from the project, returning any fees he may already have received Report the company to the proper authorities for its human rights abuse Assist the laborers in organizing a strike to obtain better working conditions An environmental engineer with five years of experience reads a story in the gulf news a proposal being presented to the city council to construct a new sewage treatment plant protected wetlands. Based on professional experience and the facts presented in the newspaper, the engineer suspects the plant would be extremely harmful to the ecosystem. Which of the following would be an acceptable course of action? The engineer should contact appropriate agencies to get more data on the before making a judgment. The engineer should write an article for the paper's editorial page urging the not to pass the project. The engineer should circulate a petition through the community condemning project, and presentation to the council. The engineer should do nothing because he doesn't have enough experience in industry to express a public opinion on the matter.Explanation / Answer
18. option d is the correct answer
deviance have to be normalised or corrected acording to challenger case
correcting problem that led to the impingment erosion is the appropriate answer
19. option d would be the correct answer
A conflict of interest (COI) is a situation in which a person or organization is involved in multiple interests, financial or otherwise, one of which could possibly corrupt the motivation or decision-making of that individual or organization.
all option innvoled in multiple intrest
20.option d is the correct answer
a,b,c are in five cobdition
but d is entirely different
21. option d is the correct answer
acording to human etheis
if we keep calm , loss of life will be occur
withdrawing from project is als not correct by taking money
if we made complaint to the proper authorities company reputation will decease
assit the labour to do stike is some what better for safety values
22. option a is the correct answer
the enginner should have to analyse more data on project before making an judgement