Case. Tennessee has numerous cases dealing with the construction and interpretat
ID: 2341631 • Letter: C
Question
Case. Tennessee has numerous cases dealing with the construction and interpretation of contracts. One recent case deals with the enforceability of a contract that is missing a key piece of information -the price. A summary of the case is as follows: A couple (referred to as Plaintiffs) had a contract with an option to purchase land at a fair price from another couple (referred to as Husband and Wife). Husband died first followed by Wife. The land was inherited by Wife's children (the Defendants). Defendants desired to sell the land, found an unrelated buyer, and notified Plaintiffs to exercise their option to purchase the land or it would be sold to the unrelated buyer. A disagreement occurred, and the land was sold to the unrelated buyer. Plaintiffs sued in Tennessee to have the option enforced. The Trial Court ruled in favor of Defendants and the Court of Appeals affirmed. 1. 1 point. Who were the parties in your assigned case? Plaintiff: 2point. What IS case's citation? 1 point. Provide a descriptive paragraph in your own words on the steps you took to find the case you identified in Item"" above Use only the space below for your neatly written answer Student grade à Instructions ding submitted work: Other ContentExplanation / Answer
Question 1:
In the given case, the couple is the Plantiff of the case.
Wife's children are the defendants of the case.
Question 2:
case citation is that the trial court has declared in favour of the Defendants and the court of appeals affirmed.thereby not allowing the plantiff to enforce the option given previously by the defendents to them.
Question 3:
The plantiff had the contract with the husband and wife and not with the wife's children to purchase the land at a fair price. So, the wife's children were not under any legal provision to sell the land only to the husband and wife. They could sell the land to any unrelated buyer.Wife's children has given an option to the couple(plantiff) for purchasing the land as per the contract which was previously entered.But the couple did not exercised the option.so the defendents can sell the land to anybody.After selling plantiff filed a case against the children which was ruled out by the court.Court of Appeals also affirmed the ruling given by the trail court.hence selling of land to unrelated buyer is correct.